Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional > Retired Regionals > Compass Airlines
Comair execs in MSP, merger with Compass >

Comair execs in MSP, merger with Compass

Search
Notices
Compass Airlines Regional Airline

Comair execs in MSP, merger with Compass

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-30-2008, 10:58 AM
  #111  
Gets Weekends Off
 
H46Bubba's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Position: NOYDB
Posts: 876
Default

Originally Posted by The Chow View Post
Bubba,

When were you guys told that all back office applications had to be the same? Does this include maestro?
I was talking witha buddy from Delta Technolgy in ATL. I dont' think that piece of crap program will live past a next spring.
H46Bubba is offline  
Old 08-30-2008, 06:24 PM
  #112  
Line Holder
 
gushubble's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2007
Position: Livin' the Dream!
Posts: 29
Default

Originally Posted by ToiletDuck View Post

Negotiations could go better and would be on a national level. The companies would be safer due to price protection of tickets, no skybus coming in trying to sell $10 since their employment cost would be relatively the same, yet the airlines would be able to increase or decrease routes, chose where they want to go, do additional things like cargo etc. Flexibility would increase for the pilots without as many drawbacks as one large seniority list for each independent company. Upgrades for the young bucks would keep on rolling dodging the stagnation of the hundreds of lifers on your list and company "strong arm" ability would die down. They couldn't say "take this pay cut or risk going to the bottom of another list making RJ FO rates for the next 5+yrs".
You made some nice points here.

As said previously, I stopped lurking and decided to post.

One question to this "hypothetical" is how do pilots from others sources fit into this system with a "National" seniority list? For example, U.S. Military pilots, or pilots who flew overseas? Would they be forced to start on the bottom 10 or 20 years into their flying career or would their "experience" place them into the seniority list at a level commensurate with their experience? Just something to think on.


I'm working for a regional after flying heavies in the military for 8 years. With my international experience (I know it's not 121 ) I'm starting on the bottom because few mainlines are hiring and after 10 years in the military QOL is very important to me. According to some I'm selling out my fellow pilots and bringing the industry down by flying for a lower wage. That's a great POV in a perfect, theoretical industry, but my family needs to eat and I love flying to much to find another profession (or move India or the middle east, I've seen way too much sand!).

So until the industry turns around or I in the lottery I'll see ya on the line, you'll know be by my 3 stripes and smile. Later!
gushubble is offline  
Old 08-30-2008, 06:53 PM
  #113  
Line Holder
 
Hot Rod Wannabe's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Position: Banker....UGH!
Posts: 75
Default ?what is whipsaw?

RickAir7777,
What is whipsaw and how does that affect pilots on two different companies??
Thanks.



Originally Posted by rickair7777 View Post
It might be more effecient in the long run to put the wholly-owned units under one roof. But there are some downsides...

-Different airplanes means minimal savings on overhead.

-Loss of whipsaw.
Hot Rod Wannabe is offline  
Old 08-30-2008, 07:04 PM
  #114  
Che Guevara
 
ToiletDuck's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2005
Posts: 6,408
Default

Originally Posted by gushubble View Post
You made some nice points here.

As said previously, I stopped lurking and decided to post.

One question to this "hypothetical" is how do pilots from others sources fit into this system with a "National" seniority list? For example, U.S. Military pilots, or pilots who flew overseas? Would they be forced to start on the bottom 10 or 20 years into their flying career or would their "experience" place them into the seniority list at a level commensurate with their experience? Just something to think on.
That's a good question. Military service I guess could have an integration ratio to place you within the overall list. The only reason that would be considered is because the MIL guys could bid into open pilot slots yet other pilots couldn't bid into open MIL slots so there would be an issue. As far as foreign guys go they'd have to start at the bottom. You'll never be able to please everyone out there. Sometimes you just gotta roll a hard six and accept things.
ToiletDuck is offline  
Old 09-02-2008, 09:33 PM
  #115  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Posts: 593
Default

I don't know if it means anything with this topic but Mesaba and Compass have a joint holdings company...my belief on that is anything that goes on with compass, mesaba will have some part in the process too
djrogs03 is offline  
Old 09-03-2008, 02:04 AM
  #116  
Line Holder
 
KITT's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2008
Position: Computer Programmer
Posts: 46
Default

That is not going to stop delta from doing what they want with their regionals.
KITT is offline  
Old 09-03-2008, 04:05 AM
  #117  
Gets Weekends Off
 
INAV8OR's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Right hemisphere of DCFranken9's brain
Posts: 238
Default

Here is a bone for you guys. I just got it of my company email. Maybe there is some truth that Cmr "mgmt" was in MSP. But not to discuss mergers....


Companies Plan Future Regional Carrier Strategy


The Regional Carrier Strategy Integration team, led by Don Bornhorst, SVP-Delta Connection, and Bryan Ebensteiner, Northwest VP-Finance & Business Development, continues work on a number of merger-related initiatives. The team is responsible for crafting all aspects of the future company’s regional strategy - from how to standardize experiences and products across its eight regional carriers to how to streamline supply chain and purchasing spend.



Composed of more than 20 functional experts, the Regionals team includes members from Delta Connection, Comair, Mesaba, and Compass. The team is working to ensure a seamless integration after the merger closes across all of the following areas: fleet, ground/ACS stations, IT, supply chain, facility and maintenance operations, HR, and others
INAV8OR is offline  
Old 09-03-2008, 06:30 AM
  #118  
Gets Weekends Off
 
ComairFO's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: CRJ Seat 13D
Posts: 349
Default

Originally Posted by Hot Rod Wannabe View Post
RickAir7777,
What is whipsaw and how does that affect pilots on two different companies??
Thanks.
I'm sure someone can explain it better than me, but whipsaw is basically matching one (or more) airline against another to try and tempt that airline into undercutting the rest = which equals a better deal for Delta. If the airlines were merged, Delta would be more limited in how they could go about doing this. Hope this helps and anyone else can feel free to post a more clear explanation!
ComairFO is offline  
Old 09-03-2008, 07:46 AM
  #119  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: Happy FO
Posts: 504
Default

I think this says it very well....


Verb 1. whipsaw - victimize, especially in gambling or negotiations
cheat, rip off, chisel - deprive somebody of something by deceit; "The con-man beat me out of $50"; "This salesman ripped us off!"; "we were cheated by their clever-sounding scheme"; "They chiseled me out of my money"
Pantera is offline  
Old 09-03-2008, 10:13 AM
  #120  
Gets Weekends Off
 
ebl14's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: 73N
Posts: 859
Default

Why do major guys always speak up about the large E-Jets, but not usually about the CRJ-900. Just curious... too good for a CRJ?
ebl14 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
SWAjet
Regional
23
01-14-2010 07:19 AM
RockBottom
Regional
3
06-05-2008 04:44 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices