Search

Notices
Compass Airlines Regional Airline

Compass updates

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-05-2015 | 09:27 PM
  #8881  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 273
Likes: 0
From: Emb 170/175 FO
Default

Originally Posted by 404yxl
That's a good report to cite Bluemoon. So basically, Delta can takeover those planes if it chooses. The big kicker there is it can already do so without cause. So basically, Delta is in control either way.

Now, what is going on, is Delta is saying they have cause to cancel the contract with Republic outright, since they can't fulfill their end of the contract. That allows Delta to get out of their obligations with payments owed on the leases per that agreement and would force Republic to negotiate on different terms.

Basically Republic is looking like Mesa of 2009, in 2015.

Not true. 1). They can't lease them out and have someone else fly them, violates our cba.

2). The exploratory portion of the suit isn't scheduled to be concluded until this spring, this is going no where fast.




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Old 12-05-2015 | 09:32 PM
  #8882  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by 404yxl
That's a good report to cite Bluemoon. So basically, Delta can takeover those planes if it chooses. The big kicker there is it can already do so without cause. So basically, Delta is in control either way.

Now, what is going on, is Delta is saying they have cause to cancel the contract with Republic outright, since they can't fulfill their end of the contract. That allows Delta to get out of their obligations with payments owed on the leases per that agreement and would force Republic to negotiate on different terms.

Basically Republic is looking like Mesa of 2009, in 2015.
My guess is Delta wants control over those planes since, given the lawsuit, they are not happy with Republic's performance. They have no intention of removing the planes from their route structure, Delta just doesn't want Republic operating them anymore.

Pure Speculation: I'm guessing Delta wants at least some of the planes and will get them one way or the other.
Old 12-06-2015 | 06:29 AM
  #8883  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 631
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by TurbineTime
Not true. 1). They can't lease them out and have someone else fly them, violates our cba




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
My friends from Colgan thought the same thing about the Q400s....
But where did they end up?
Old 12-06-2015 | 07:23 AM
  #8884  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by TurbineTime
Not true. 1). They can't lease them out and have someone else fly them, violates our cba.

2). The exploratory portion of the suit isn't scheduled to be concluded until this spring, this is going no where fast.




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Based on what both Delta's and Republic's quarterly report says, nothing suggest that Delta will lease the planes from Republic. The reports indicate that Republic will sell airplanes owned by Republic to Delta and Delta will take over leases of planes that Republic was currently leasing.

Also Delta can terminate at any time and effect that clause. Does not have to wait for the lawsuit to conclude. The lawsuit might just be Delta wanting more then planes. They want damages on top of the termination of the agreement or some thing to that effect.
Old 12-06-2015 | 07:34 AM
  #8885  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 3,045
Likes: 1
From: FO
Default

I don't want the planes, but am merely providing what I think are pertinent information to this thread.

From the RAH pilots contract I found online:

G. Sale/Transfer/Lease of Companies’ Aircraft
The Company or any Subsidiary of the Company, Republic Airways Holdings, Inc. (the Parent) or any Subsidiaries of Republic Airways Holdings, Inc. may not sell, lease or transfer an aircraft to another Air Carrier or entity for the purpose of evading the terms of this agreement. The Company, Republic Airways Holdings, Inc. (the Parent) or any Subsidiaries of Republic Airways Holdings, Inc. may sell, lease or transfer an aircraft to another Air Carrier or entity when the Company no longer requires such aircraft for its operation.

I. Dry/Wet Lease
1. The Company will not enter into any wet lease agreement with or for any other carrier or entities (government, military or commercial) without mutual agreement with the Union.
a. No Pilot within the bargaining unit will be reduced in status or lose any income or employee benefits while discussions are taking place or during the period of the wet lease.
b. The Union will not disagree to a wet lease solely due to grounding of Company aircraft due to a force majeure event, i.e., governmental action or an act of nature, so long as the Company acts with due diligence to remedy the event.
2. The Company will give the Union at least thirty days’ notice prior to the effective date of the dry lease of Company aircraft to another Air Carrier or entity pursuant to Section G. At the request of the Union it may review the actual dry lease documents, subject to appropriate confidentiality agreements.
Old 12-06-2015 | 07:39 AM
  #8886  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 631
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by BlueMoon
I don't want the planes, but am merely providing what I think are pertinent information to this thread.

From the RAH pilots contract I found online:

G. Sale/Transfer/Lease of Companies’ Aircraft
The Company or any Subsidiary of the Company, Republic Airways Holdings, Inc. (the Parent) or any Subsidiaries of Republic Airways Holdings, Inc. may not sell, lease or transfer an aircraft to another Air Carrier or entity for the purpose of evading the terms of this agreement. The Company, Republic Airways Holdings, Inc. (the Parent) or any Subsidiaries of Republic Airways Holdings, Inc. may sell, lease or transfer an aircraft to another Air Carrier or entity when the Company no longer requires such aircraft for its operation.

I. Dry/Wet Lease
1. The Company will not enter into any wet lease agreement with or for any other carrier or entities (government, military or commercial) without mutual agreement with the Union.
a. No Pilot within the bargaining unit will be reduced in status or lose any income or employee benefits while discussions are taking place or during the period of the wet lease.
b. The Union will not disagree to a wet lease solely due to grounding of Company aircraft due to a force majeure event, i.e., governmental action or an act of nature, so long as the Company acts with due diligence to remedy the event.
2. The Company will give the Union at least thirty days’ notice prior to the effective date of the dry lease of Company aircraft to another Air Carrier or entity pursuant to Section G. At the request of the Union it may review the actual dry lease documents, subject to appropriate confidentiality agreements.
They wouldn't be transferring them to get around the CBA. They would be transferring them because they can't meet their CPA and would otherwise get sued. That section has to do with alter ego airlines IMO.
Old 12-06-2015 | 07:45 AM
  #8887  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 504
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Peoloto
They wouldn't be transferring them to get around the CBA. They would be transferring them because they can't meet their CPA and would otherwise get sued. That section has to do with alter ego airlines IMO.
Right. So to wrap up this whole ****ing match, Delta gets the planes if they want them and RAH pilots are SOL. Moving right along.
Old 12-06-2015 | 07:46 AM
  #8888  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 4,564
Likes: 24
Default

they will probably go to mainline skywest
Old 12-06-2015 | 07:56 AM
  #8889  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 273
Likes: 0
From: Emb 170/175 FO
Default

Originally Posted by BlueMoon
I don't want the planes, but am merely providing what I think are pertinent information to this thread.



From the RAH pilots contract I found online:



G. Sale/Transfer/Lease of Companies’ Aircraft

The Company or any Subsidiary of the Company, Republic Airways Holdings, Inc. (the Parent) or any Subsidiaries of Republic Airways Holdings, Inc. may not sell, lease or transfer an aircraft to another Air Carrier or entity for the purpose of evading the terms of this agreement. The Company, Republic Airways Holdings, Inc. (the Parent) or any Subsidiaries of Republic Airways Holdings, Inc. may sell, lease or transfer an aircraft to another Air Carrier or entity when the Company no longer requires such aircraft for its operation.



I. Dry/Wet Lease

1. The Company will not enter into any wet lease agreement with or for any other carrier or entities (government, military or commercial) without mutual agreement with the Union.

a. No Pilot within the bargaining unit will be reduced in status or lose any income or employee benefits while discussions are taking place or during the period of the wet lease.

b. The Union will not disagree to a wet lease solely due to grounding of Company aircraft due to a force majeure event, i.e., governmental action or an act of nature, so long as the Company acts with due diligence to remedy the event.

2. The Company will give the Union at least thirty days’ notice prior to the effective date of the dry lease of Company aircraft to another Air Carrier or entity pursuant to Section G. At the request of the Union it may review the actual dry lease documents, subject to appropriate confidentiality agreements.

The only aircraft that would be considered no longer required for the operation would be the 145's, which is what Bedford wants anyway. As I stated before, the delta painted 170's will be moved over to the United operation as a nearly 1 for 1 replacement for the canceled ejets.

If Delta was going to unilaterally cancel their contract, you would think they would have done so already, well before they got into a protracted lawsuit with a contractor. Plus republic has now filed a counter suit against delta claiming delta owes a significant sum of money (don't have the figures in front of me, won't speculate) related to the current dispute.

In reality, this is looking more and more like Bedfords way of getting down to a single fleet type. I don't agree with the way he's doing it, but I think the end result will be the termination of all delta flying at Republic. The 145's will go to the desert and the 170's will have Death Stars on their tails. This will leave a hole for another delta connection carrier to fill (or hopefully mainline!!) but that is how I see this panning out.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Old 12-06-2015 | 08:00 AM
  #8890  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 273
Likes: 0
From: Emb 170/175 FO
Default

Originally Posted by ThreeStripe
Right. So to wrap up this whole ****ing match, Delta gets the planes if they want them and RAH pilots are SOL. Moving right along.

As much as you'd love that to be true, it's not accurate.

Also, this isn't a pi**ing match, it's an actual discussion. Pretty tough to come by on apc these days. So kindly ****** off.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
StallFail
Compass Airlines
65
11-16-2009 08:04 AM
JungleBus
Major
121
12-20-2008 04:13 PM
rickkane
Compass Airlines
143
12-04-2008 01:19 PM
drosenst
Compass Airlines
12
11-19-2008 06:32 PM
Lifeisgood
Compass Airlines
7
08-01-2008 05:57 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices