Search

Notices
Compass Airlines Regional Airline

Compass Updates - Saga Continues

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-26-2016, 12:45 PM
  #661  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2014
Posts: 302
Default

Originally Posted by max gross
Freight pilots are less likely to stall the plane turning base in LAX. Anyone who defends low experience doesn't see the big picture. Can a 200 hr pilot learn normal procedures just as well if not better than the guy with experience? Sure, but that's not the point. Colgan anyone?
Yet I find myself scratching my head at some of these guys trying their best to stall in that turn going, "you came from Ameriflight??" Experience may be king, but bad pilots are bad pilots whether they have 300hrs, 3000hrs, or 30,000 hrs.
GreatBigSea is offline  
Old 04-26-2016, 12:51 PM
  #662  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2014
Posts: 302
Default

Originally Posted by FLYZERG
Fly freight in a twin for a 1000 hours and your book will not be the same.
What about flying freight in a Single? 10hr vs 1000hr the same thing if nothing bad ever happens?

All i'm saying is complacency is the enemy. All that experience is moot if the pilot becomes too comfortable.

Last edited by GreatBigSea; 04-26-2016 at 01:23 PM.
GreatBigSea is offline  
Old 04-26-2016, 01:00 PM
  #663  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2014
Posts: 128
Default

Originally Posted by GreatBigSea
Yet I find myself scratching my head at some of these guys trying their best to stall in that turn going, "you came from Ameriflight??" Experience may be king, but bad pilots are bad pilots whether they have 300hrs, 3000hrs, or 30,000 hrs.
I said less likely. There are mediocre pilots in freight as well.
max gross is offline  
Old 04-26-2016, 02:27 PM
  #664  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2010
Posts: 600
Default

12 more upgrades
Ar Pilot is offline  
Old 04-26-2016, 03:45 PM
  #665  
Pathological Flyer
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Posts: 694
Default

Originally Posted by FLYZERG
Fly freight in a twin for a 1000 hours and your book will not be the same.
Or helicopters with dynamite on a 50 ft. line..
Flightsoffusion is offline  
Old 04-26-2016, 06:09 PM
  #666  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2014
Position: backseat
Posts: 103
Default

When hiring is booming, the regionals have hired low timers for the right seat since the regionals were invented. United hired pilots with 300 hrs in the sixties when available pilots were hard to come by. All these companies rely on the CAs to keep the plane out of trouble.
When I was a CA at Mesa, 90% of their new-hires came from their training program in Farmington. Those pilots had about 350hrs total. I flew with a different one every month. Some were great, better than FOs with 2 years on the line, others not so great. What I learned from them was that it does not matter how many hrs you have in your log book. It is what you have learned during that time.
magneto is offline  
Old 04-26-2016, 09:43 PM
  #667  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2015
Posts: 171
Default

Originally Posted by GrassLandings
I dont know if we changed our hiring mins, I highly doubt we did. But as long as new hires start class with 25 multi (actual time), the 25 you get in the sim during training counts towards the 50 for the ATP.
A guy in my class had that same question. He started with 25.3 or something like that.
However, he had his written done before the deadline. So no ATP-CTP course or whatever that new BS is. That could very well be the reason why 25 was ok for him, and not for people who dont have the written yet. I dont know what is required for that new ATP written course.
I also haven't heard anything about such changes. And it's not about the ATP CTP course either. I personally came through in the fall with 26.2 hrs. multi and having gone through ATP CTP. The combination of the ATP CTP and Compass training sim time exceeded 25 hours, fulfilling the requirements of the FARs for the ATP (50 AMEL, 25 max in a sim). Now, during my interview I was told by the pilot recruiter that because I don't have 50 hrs. multi he'll need to get a special OK from the Chief Pilot. He left the room, came back in 5 minutes and said he got the OK So perhaps the company policy just changed and we don't know about it. But it's not an external authorization.

On a separate note, I found the ATP CTP program surprisingly useful and not a waste of time I expected. Anyone else cares to chime in? Just for fun.
Tailfloatski is offline  
Old 04-26-2016, 09:55 PM
  #668  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2015
Posts: 171
Default

Originally Posted by Calvert
That is actually pretty scary if people are being hired with 25 ME hours.
As others have already said, it's not. Compare two scenarios:

1. A 50 hour AMEL fresh ATP in the right seat of a modern twin turbojet, with outstanding reliability of modern turbofans, dramatic excess performance, and an experienced Captain in the left seat.

2. The same 50 hour ATP alone in the left seat of an ancient 150 HP Apache on a hot day, trying to clear that proverbial fence at the end of the runway relying on equally ancient O-320s that may or may not be way past TBO because the 134.5 operation he flies for views maintenance as a drain on profit.

Which situation provides greater overall safety? And that's even before we start talking about recurrent training. In Scenario 1, in 6 months the now 400 AMEL hour ATP will come back to the sims where the instructors will beat the crap out of him. Repeat every 6 months. (May be 9 months, but the point is still the same). In Scenario 2, he'll keep flying the same airplane if he's still alive.
Tailfloatski is offline  
Old 04-27-2016, 12:30 AM
  #669  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2013
Posts: 806
Default

Originally Posted by Tailfloatski
As others have already said, it's not. Compare two scenarios:

1. A 50 hour AMEL fresh ATP in the right seat of a modern twin turbojet, with outstanding reliability of modern turbofans, dramatic excess performance, and an experienced Captain in the left seat.

2. The same 50 hour ATP alone in the left seat of an ancient 150 HP Apache on a hot day, trying to clear that proverbial fence at the end of the runway relying on equally ancient O-320s that may or may not be way past TBO because the 134.5 operation he flies for views maintenance as a drain on profit.

Which situation provides greater overall safety? And that's even before we start talking about recurrent training. In Scenario 1, in 6 months the now 400 AMEL hour ATP will come back to the sims where the instructors will beat the crap out of him. Repeat every 6 months. (May be 9 months, but the point is still the same). In Scenario 2, he'll keep flying the same airplane if he's still alive.
Hey man...I think the only disadvantage to coming in with the low ME time is the lack of understanding or knowledge behind single-engine aerodynamics in a multi-engine airplane, specifically the muscle memory an MEI acquires as he will feather either sides during training flights with students. I don't think 25 hours of ME gets you anywhere close to understanding what the airplane would do if it accidentally went below Vmc beyond rote memorization (most people get their ME in 7 hours).

So, I think the question is more about.....should Ameriflight hire someone with 25 hours of ME to go fly Beech 1900 or a Metroliner with substantially bigger props that'll give you a work out if you have an engine failure? (The answer is probably NOT, but Yes they still do).

In regards to ME mattering in modern airliners like the E175 where 99.99% of engine failures happen in the sim, I think most people will be alright - as long as they take the time to absorb and constantly learn.

Otherwise, the most "action" you see at Compass with multi-engine situations is when the CA pulls into the Eagle's nest after having asked the FO to shut down Number 2, and right before he's about to make that tight left turn into one of the gates with only Number 1 on, he goes "oh crap".
Da40Pilot is offline  
Old 04-27-2016, 07:15 AM
  #670  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2016
Posts: 273
Default

anyone know what is going on at the recruiting office?
got an email to call them for phone interview. Been calling and leaving message for a few days, no one ever answers and no return calls
CaptainDooley is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jparker371
Compass Airlines
9413
03-01-2016 08:57 AM
35RSLC
Compass Airlines
37
05-31-2015 02:58 PM
3inthegreen
Compass Airlines
130
04-14-2015 03:44 PM
drosenst
Compass Airlines
12
11-19-2008 06:32 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices