Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Pilot Lounge > Hangar Talk > COVID19
Lockdown and Civil Unrest Discussion >

Lockdown and Civil Unrest Discussion

Search
Notices
COVID19 Pandemic Information and Reports

Lockdown and Civil Unrest Discussion

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-01-2020, 10:48 AM
  #171  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2019
Posts: 472
Default

Originally Posted by velosnow View Post
First off hope your son stays healthy through this and long past it.

But don't we already have an expectation of dictating other's actions to a degree as a part of living in a society? From (reasonably) obeying speed limits, to washing one's hands, to not randomly chucking rocks at people because you feel like is all a part of a social contract. Extending that during times of pandemic is perfectly reasonable to me. No, we can't force people to do the right thing all the time, but since we've moved on from being selfish heathens (well most of us) we should have by now figured out it isn't just about ourselves.

The trouble is with something as highly transmissible as this is, it's near impossible to know what our actions can cause downstream. Isolating those who we believe are high risk just isn't feasible, we can't seal up millions of people in isolation chambers for the foreseeable future. Just as we can't expect people to stay locked down forever, but a reasonable approach to combating this doesn't mean willy nilly opening it up and getting 'back to normal' overnight.
Reasonable..... A speed.limit is reasonable. Banning driving is unreasonable.

The protocols of self preservation and self risk assessment have been flipped on their head. I am not being antisocial if I choose to go out. The world has changed and everyone is now aware of the risks...therefore allow.people to make their own decision on whether they want to go out or not. No one is demanding that the vulnerable be dragged kicking and screaming to a packed stadium. All people are saying is "let me accept the risk". But no...people like you perversly distort reality by indicating that if people in general were allowed out that it means ALL people MUST come out.

Allowing the non vulnerable out is not going to change the stats one bit, no matter how much you wish it.
Tom Bradys Cat is offline  
Old 05-01-2020, 10:53 AM
  #172  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2015
Posts: 1,063
Default

Originally Posted by Thor View Post
We'll know by Labor Day if there's a second and more pronounced spike as a result of opening certain states too soon. My prediction is no matter what, the "don't tread on me klan" will continue to be belligerent and frame the public health policy associated with the pandemic as an assault on freedom and apple pie.
What if I told you, we could start getting people back to work AND adjust our behavior to prevent spread of the virus?
Flyfalcons is offline  
Old 05-01-2020, 10:55 AM
  #173  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2019
Posts: 472
Default

Originally Posted by nludy View Post
Well said!

What's really an embarrassment is the pilots on here downplaying 65,000 Americans that didn't have to die in the past couple of months. The rational is unbelievable. It's like saying we should make drinking and driving legal because it will only kill 50,000 people a year.
No one has downplayed the deaths, people are just being pragmatic realists. Yet another virtue signal. I hope your bank account is empty....cause if you got any spare change there are pleanty of lives that can be spared with those savings.
Tom Bradys Cat is offline  
Old 05-01-2020, 10:57 AM
  #174  
Speed Verified
 
Beech Dude's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2017
Posts: 1,060
Default

Originally Posted by Thor View Post
We'll know by Labor Day if there's a second and more pronounced spike as a result of opening certain states too soon. My prediction is no matter what, the "don't tread on me klan" will continue to be belligerent and frame the public health policy associated with the pandemic as an assault on freedom and apple pie.
How are they being belligerent? Legal protests and legal civil disobedience. People exercising their rights. If people chanting, waving flags, honking horns, and legally carrying lawfully purchased firearms, is belligerent; what would you call the antifa crowd that physically assualts people?

Just because someone carries a gun, that is not a threatening act. Unfortunately, it makes alot of people afraid. I support them exercising their rights, and carrying legally, but I think they should have left their guns in the truck on this one, so that the redneck, armed "white mob" , yada yada, crap could have stayed out of this problem.
Beech Dude is offline  
Old 05-01-2020, 11:04 AM
  #175  
Perennial Reserve
 
Excargodog's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2018
Posts: 11,688
Default

Originally Posted by Tom Bradys Cat View Post
Allowing the non vulnerable out is not going to change the stats one bit, no matter how much you wish it.
That is not strictly speaking true, the first part at least. Like people who have been immunized against an organism, the presence in the population of substantial numbers of people WHO HAVE ALREADY HAD THE DISEASE dilutes down the population of susceptibles and decreases the effective R0 of the infecting organism. The ideal situation in any epidemic is if everyone who won’t be hurt by an illness has already had it.

Prior to the development of the rubella vaccine it was not uncommon for young girls to be taken by their parents to “German Measles parties” where they were encouraged to catch the illness before they reached child-bearing age.

https://www.historyofvaccines.org/co...ticles/rubella
Excargodog is offline  
Old 05-01-2020, 11:17 AM
  #176  
Gets Weekends Off
 
drywhitetoast's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2018
Position: Sitting
Posts: 500
Default

Originally Posted by Excargodog View Post
That is not strictly speaking true, the first part at least. Like people who have been immunized against an organism, the presence in the population of substantial numbers of people WHO HAVE ALREADY HAD THE DISEASE dilutes down the population of susceptibles and decreases the effective R0 of the infecting organism. The ideal situation in any epidemic is if everyone who won’t be hurt by an illness has already had it.

Prior to the development of the rubella vaccine it was not uncommon for young girls to be taken by their parents to “German Measles parties” where they were encouraged to catch the illness before they reached child-bearing age.

https://www.historyofvaccines.org/co...ticles/rubella
Same with chicken pox. As kids we were encouraged to get it growing up.
drywhitetoast is offline  
Old 05-01-2020, 11:24 AM
  #177  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2010
Posts: 977
Default

Originally Posted by Aero1900 View Post
Americans are too dumb to deal with this.

The US has done by far the worst job containing the spread of this disease and will therefore suffer the most. Lots of other countries have significantly slowed the spread and can safely start reopening. We are going to reopen before we see any progress. The United States response to this pandemic is an embarrassment.

Over 60,000 Americas have already died. That's 20X more than 9/11 and more than the entire Vietnam War.... And it only took 3 months!

Our incredibly poor handling of this will ensure that we suffer the most. While other countries go back to normal, we will be floundering. We have already had 5x more cases than anywhere else, and triple the deaths of the next worst country.

But yeah, we should totally protest the stay at home order. Let's see how bad we can make this. Let's all disregard information and rational thought. Let's pretend this is the govt trying to take away your liberty. Let's reopen everything and see if we can kill 100k people by the 4th of July. Let's keep spreading the virus so we can keep our schools closed and planes grounded for a long time! Let's open it up so we can make the problem far worse. Let's open it up and delay the return to normal as long as possible. Let's keep digging this hole deeper! Let's make this political! You know, because the virus cares who you voted for.

We have got to stop taking political sides on everything. We need to do the right thing so we can actually slow the spread and start to resume normal life. In case you haven't noticed, the Gov't hasn't stopped the airlines from flying. In fact, the govt just handed the airlines 25 Billion dollars and said "you can have this money so long as you keep flying." But.... no one is flying. People are scared of getting sick and dying. People are trying to stop the spread of the disease. Protesters at the capital are not part of the solution.

I fear that the United States will suffer far worse than anywhere else on earth. And we can thank the non stop, political BS this country consumes.

You can flame away and be mad at me or think I'm an idiot. I don't care. We are failing this miserably. And the folks who refuse to take officials advice and recommendations because of a political meme they saw on Facebook will continue to make the problem worse.
The same officials all got it wrong—on all sides:

CDC, WHO, Surgeon General, Pelosi, DeBlasio, White House, the media on all sides

Now the media narrative has shifted to “follow the scientists/official advice”...uhhhhhh from the same exact agencies who got it all absolutely wrong?

Jan/Feb/Early March: “Trump is being xenophobic/racist for blocking travel from China”, Pelosi walking around Chinatown wo a mask encouraging ppl to go there, DeBlasio doing the same in NYC; CDC says don’t wear masks if you aren’t sick

Late March: “Trump is a buffoon because this is so bad, it’s all his fault; listen to the CDC; stay home—we have to save lives”

April: “Masks are now required even if you aren’t sick, forget everything we said back in March”

May: “Oh you can all go back to work now...we can figure it out as we go along, or something”

I’m an independent—I’m not picking sides based on some idiotic tribal party logic—but we have a serious credibility problem within our institutions (to include Congress and the CDC), and while I have no interest in protesting, I completely understand the frustrations of those doing so. Why would they trust their lives and livelihoods to the very same media and political entities who all got it completely wrong (on all sides)?
flapshalfspeed is offline  
Old 05-01-2020, 11:24 AM
  #178  
You look like a nail
 
Joined APC: May 2012
Posts: 451
Default

Originally Posted by Beech Dude View Post
Just because someone carries a gun, that is not a threatening act. Unfortunately, it makes alot of people afraid. I support them exercising their rights, and carrying legally, but I think they should have left their guns in the truck on this one, so that the redneck, armed "white mob" , yada yada, crap could have stayed out of this problem.
I was referring to gaggle that stormed the Michigan Capitol Building. Are you trying to paint that as anything other than an angry mob? Within their rights, maybe. Changing minds, doubtful.

https://youtu.be/TbpKnWxMhyg
Thor is offline  
Old 05-01-2020, 11:25 AM
  #179  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Jul 2016
Posts: 48
Default

Originally Posted by Burton78 View Post
Ironic. Where was your outrage of all the deaths from the flu that many people have pointed out? Or are you down playing those deaths because it doesn't fit your narrative? Carry on with your poo flinging contest.
Ask the residents of NYC if it's just the flu.

The Coronavirus is way more infectious than the season flu. That's the problem. The Coronavirus has the ability to infect possibly 80% of the population. Hence the planet is on lockdown. I don't think anyone wants 500 million dead otherwise.

Not sure what's so hard to understand about this?
nludy is offline  
Old 05-01-2020, 11:27 AM
  #180  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2019
Posts: 472
Default

Originally Posted by Excargodog View Post
That is not strictly speaking true, the first part at least. Like people who have been immunized against an organism, the presence in the population of substantial numbers of people WHO HAVE ALREADY HAD THE DISEASE dilutes down the population of susceptibles and decreases the effective R0 of the infecting organism. The ideal situation in any epidemic is if everyone who won’t be hurt by an illness has already had it.

Prior to the development of the rubella vaccine it was not uncommon for young girls to be taken by their parents to “German Measles parties” where they were encouraged to catch the illness before they reached child-bearing age.

https://www.historyofvaccines.org/co...ticles/rubella
My bad should have said.....negatively.
Tom Bradys Cat is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
flyforfun
Flight Schools and Training
13
08-13-2008 12:22 PM
tdm1011
Flight Schools and Training
18
04-16-2008 11:06 AM
Squawk_5543
Your Photos and Videos
12
06-21-2007 08:59 PM
MikeInTx
Flight Schools and Training
7
05-13-2007 02:52 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices