Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Pilot Lounge > Hangar Talk > COVID19
It sucks to be a hostage... >

It sucks to be a hostage...

Search

Notices
COVID19 Pandemic Information and Reports

It sucks to be a hostage...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-08-2020 | 09:36 PM
  #11  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 492
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Knobcrk1
They’re not. In fact it was Pelosi that’s been trying to get the deal done. Probably for ulterior motives, but still, when Trump got sick they tried to get something done quickly while the meds were still kicking in. If they don’t come up with something next few days there probably won’t be one till after the new year.
Pelosi has been pretty clear. The airline bailout is in the bill that the house passed and she’s not going to do standalone bills. Imagine if your union came out and said they company won’t agree to a contract because of an impasse, and the company is willing to enact one section of the CBA for now, but can’t be used later for negotiations...
Reply
Old 10-08-2020 | 09:47 PM
  #12  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Dec 2016
Posts: 136
Likes: 4
Default

Originally Posted by atooraya
Pelosi has been pretty clear. The airline bailout is in the bill that the house passed and she’s not going to do standalone bills. Imagine if your union came out and said they company won’t agree to a contract because of an impasse, and the company is willing to enact one section of the CBA for now, but can’t be used later for negotiations...

You do realize that the bill pelosi passed is full of ******* that has nothing to do with providing relief to a country that could use it. Items such as:
  • Barring voter ID requirements,
  • Forcing states to count absentee ballots that arrive as late as 10 days after Election Day, and
  • Imposing same-day voter registration everywhere (only 21 states currently allow it
And:
  • Only $5 billion (2%) of $225 billion earmarked for school districts would go to making health safety improvements. “The rest is a teachers union protection plan.”
  • $417 billion to state and local governments, with no strings.
  • $600 billion-plus allocated to cities, states and school districts would be consumed plugging budget holes.
  • $5 billion for community development block grants is labeled by the bill as “flexible resources.”
Its infuriating to see either party putting party line crap in a stimulus bill that’s going out to help people that encompass both sides of the aisle. I just want to see targeted spending and none of the political crap added in.
Reply
Old 10-09-2020 | 05:47 AM
  #13  
block30's Avatar
Bracing for Fallacies
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,543
Likes: 0
From: In favor of good things, not in favor of bad things
Default

Originally Posted by KSUto64
You do realize that the bill pelosi passed is full of ******* that has nothing to do with providing relief to a country that could use it. Items such as:
  • Barring voter ID requirements,
  • Forcing states to count absentee ballots that arrive as late as 10 days after Election Day, and
  • Imposing same-day voter registration everywhere (only 21 states currently allow it
And:
  • Only $5 billion (2%) of $225 billion earmarked for school districts would go to making health safety improvements. “The rest is a teachers union protection plan.”
  • $417 billion to state and local governments, with no strings.
  • $600 billion-plus allocated to cities, states and school districts would be consumed plugging budget holes.
  • $5 billion for community development block grants is labeled by the bill as “flexible resources.”
Its infuriating to see either party putting party line crap in a stimulus bill that’s going out to help people that encompass both sides of the aisle. I just want to see targeted spending and none of the political crap added in.
Such a good point! What is really in a bill/each side's bill proposal?
Reply
Old 10-09-2020 | 06:21 AM
  #14  
Excargodog's Avatar
Thread Starter
Perennial Reserve
 
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 14,183
Likes: 238
Default

Originally Posted by atooraya
Pelosi has been pretty clear. The airline bailout is in the bill that the house passed and she’s not going to do standalone bills. Imagine if your union came out and said they company won’t agree to a contract because of an impasse, and the company is willing to enact one section of the CBA for now, but can’t be used later for negotiations...
Sure. Let’s not pass things that everyone agrees about so we can hold that thing hostage to something that only one side agrees with.

Do it MY way, or I’m going to shoot this puppy....


Reply
Old 10-09-2020 | 06:50 AM
  #15  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2017
Posts: 965
Likes: 7
Default

Welcome to the world of being a political football. But keep telling yourself that there isn’t something deeply broken in how this country operates. You can acknowledge that something is broken and still be patriotic. In fact being honest about a country’s shortcomings is more patriotic then denying they exist. The Marxist thing to do would be to deny the existence of a problem in the first place, just let that sink in.
Reply
Old 10-09-2020 | 07:53 AM
  #16  
Banned
 
Joined: Jun 2019
Posts: 92
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by block30
Such a good point! What is really in a bill/each side's bill proposal?
Careful stating facts, their heads might explode. You are a (fill in the blank) response.
I am having a difficult time understanding how people in this industry can champion its demise.
Reply
Old 10-09-2020 | 08:18 AM
  #17  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 492
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by block30
Such a good point! What is really in a bill/each side's bill proposal?
Facts on each proposal:
https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-...%5D%7D&s=5&r=1

Just like the previous bill that was passed in March, there are earmarks. Just like the same earmarks that Republicans are trying to pass with their provision that prevents employers from being held accountable for unsafe COVID conditions.


Originally Posted by pipewrench
Careful stating facts, their heads might explode. You are a (fill in the blank) response.
I am having a difficult time understanding how people in this industry can champion its demise.
Which facts? Alternative facts or real facts? Aren't we all entitled to our own fact opinions?


Originally Posted by terks43
Welcome to the world of being a political football. But keep telling yourself that there isn’t something deeply broken in how this country operates. You can acknowledge that something is broken and still be patriotic. In fact being honest about a country’s shortcomings is more patriotic then denying they exist. The Marxist thing to do would be to deny the existence of a problem in the first place, just let that sink in.

Ummm, the current message from one side that we're getting is, "The best is yet to come!" That this country has never been as great as it is now, and nobody can make it any better than the current administration.

I'm trying to find where Karl Marx wrote that denying existences of problems in his manifesto. Can you point me to that? Alternative facts are fine as well.
Reply
Old 10-09-2020 | 08:35 AM
  #18  
Banned
 
Joined: Jun 2019
Posts: 92
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by atooraya
Facts on each proposal:
https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-...%5D%7D&s=5&r=1

Just like the previous bill that was passed in March, there are earmarks. Just like the same earmarks that Republicans are trying to pass with their provision that prevents employers from being held accountable for unsafe COVID conditions.



Which facts? Alternative facts or real facts? Aren't we all entitled to our own fact opinions?



Ummm, the current message from one side that we're getting is, "The best is yet to come!" That this country has never been as great as it is now, and nobody can make it any better than the current administration.

I'm trying to find where Karl Marx wrote that denying existences of problems in his manifesto. Can you point me to that? Alternative facts are fine as well.
Yeh because changing voting laws a month before an election is worth holding people hostage, Okay!
Reply
Old 10-09-2020 | 09:14 AM
  #19  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 492
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by pipewrench
Yeh because changing voting laws a month before an election is worth holding people hostage, Okay!
Maybe because states are demanding ID while offices are closed...
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politic...ter-id-measure

Also, the word "hostage" is pretty dramatic. You're all free to leave, and the airlines are free to find money elsewhere.
Reply
Old 10-09-2020 | 09:22 AM
  #20  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2019
Posts: 1,538
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by atooraya
Maybe because states are demanding ID while offices are closed...
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politic...ter-id-measure

Also, the word "hostage" is pretty dramatic. You're all free to leave, and the airlines are free to find money elsewhere.
How many citizens of this country over the age of eighteen do you assert are out there working, going to college/school, and driving around without a valid ID already in their possession?
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
HoboPilot
Hangar Talk
5
04-11-2008 05:32 AM
kdoner
Regional
56
03-09-2008 08:55 PM
Longbow64
Flight Schools and Training
25
07-28-2007 08:43 PM
Lbell911
Major
1
06-28-2007 06:32 AM
flyerfly
Regional
12
06-19-2006 11:49 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices