Search

Notices
COVID19 Pandemic Information and Reports

Lockdown Part 2

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-10-2020 | 01:01 PM
  #211  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 647
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Mesabah
If you apply science, math specifically, to the election results, there is significant fraud in the results. Where that goes, is anyone's guess.
How?

There's small-scale fraud in every election on both sides from people mailing in their dead mom's vote or similar. It's a felony and I don't see how tens of thousands of voters in every state could get away with it.

I personally think stuffing the ballot box is too resource intensive, aside from all the measures taken to prevent it. 100k votes, each taking 1 minute to fraud, would be 1666 man-hours, and I bet it'd take a lot more than 1 minute per vote. Suppressing voters is way easier and effectively the same as stuffing the ballot box.

Although I'm sure it'll be thoroughly investigated, It's his right to sue and press for recounts and investigations. That's not even unprecedented. I just don't see how a fraud campaign across so many states could be possible.
Reply
Old 11-10-2020 | 01:04 PM
  #212  
Banned
 
Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 8,831
Likes: 499
Default

Originally Posted by Mesabah
If you apply science, math specifically, to the election results, there is significant fraud in the results. Where that goes, is anyone's guess.
except that there isn’t. It’s all baseless allegations and outright misrepresentations without any hard evidence of widespread fraud that would change any outcome. We will indeed see where it goes
Reply
Old 11-10-2020 | 01:40 PM
  #213  
:-)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,339
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by Duffman
How?

There's small-scale fraud in every election on both sides from people mailing in their dead mom's vote or similar. It's a felony and I don't see how tens of thousands of voters in every state could get away with it.

I personally think stuffing the ballot box is too resource intensive, aside from all the measures taken to prevent it. 100k votes, each taking 1 minute to fraud, would be 1666 man-hours, and I bet it'd take a lot more than 1 minute per vote. Suppressing voters is way easier and effectively the same as stuffing the ballot box.

Although I'm sure it'll be thoroughly investigated, It's his right to sue and press for recounts and investigations. That's not even unprecedented. I just don't see how a fraud campaign across so many states could be possible.
It wasn't ballot stuffing, the forensic statistical analysis points to a software glitch. A proper recount will fix this issue.
Reply
Old 11-10-2020 | 01:42 PM
  #214  
P/T Gear Slinger
 
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 886
Likes: 40
From: Airbus
Default

Originally Posted by Mesabah
If you apply science, math specifically, to the election results, there is significant fraud in the results.
Esplain Lucy......
Reply
Old 11-10-2020 | 02:07 PM
  #215  
:-)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,339
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by emersonbiguns
Esplain Lucy......
Biden's results in the swing states don't follow the natural law of anomalous numbers, however they do everywhere else, and so do the down ballot candidates, Democrat or Republican, including Trump. The simplest explanation is that the numbers were reported wrong by the software, and need to be recounted before they can be certified. It will probably flip the result, but will, because of the process law, lead to the election being decided in the House. I would bet neither Trump, or Biden is the President come the end of January. Pence perhaps, due to compromise?
Reply
Old 11-10-2020 | 02:18 PM
  #216  
Speed, Power, Accuracy
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,797
Likes: 10
From: PIC
Default

Originally Posted by Mesabah
It wasn't ballot stuffing, the forensic statistical analysis points to a software glitch. A proper recount will fix this issue.
Isn’t it ironic that EVERY time there is a computer “glitch,” it always seems to favor one party?

It doesn’t matter who is voting. It matters who is COUNTING.
Reply
Old 11-10-2020 | 02:26 PM
  #217  
Beech Dude's Avatar
SrFOorJrCAisthe?
5 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 1,659
Likes: 310
Default

Originally Posted by GeeWizDriver
Isn’t it ironic that EVERY time there is a computer “glitch,” it always seems to favor one party?

It doesn’t matter who is voting. It matters who is COUNTING.
This is the sticking point. We didn't see glitches or delays in say...Vermont, Oregon, or California. Nor did the millions of mail in ballots in those states cause problems for some reason. It just needs to be investigated for the good of the country, regardless of party.
Reply
Old 11-10-2020 | 02:27 PM
  #218  
AZFlyer's Avatar
Custom User Title
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,275
Likes: 0
Default

Benford's Law.
Reply
Old 11-10-2020 | 02:34 PM
  #219  
:-)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,339
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by GeeWizDriver
Isn’t it ironic that EVERY time there is a computer “glitch,” it always seems to favor one party?

It doesn’t matter who is voting. It matters who is COUNTING.
It's going to be interesting to hear why the down ballot Democrats got reported correctly, and Biden's incorrectly.
Reply
Old 11-10-2020 | 02:45 PM
  #220  
Speed, Power, Accuracy
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,797
Likes: 10
From: PIC
Default

Originally Posted by AZFlyer
Benford's Law.
Forgive my mathematical density, but it would seem that the pause in vote count in a half dozen states, at roughly the same time early Wednesday morning, and the subsequent MAJOR shift in results violates the he11 out of Benford’s Law and every other statistical principle with which I am familiar.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
GWBic
Aviation Law
18
05-18-2018 02:13 PM
jetfuelonly
Corporate
9
08-30-2012 03:07 PM
N618FT
Regional
34
11-19-2007 07:28 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices