Notices

08 may ae

Old 05-22-2017 | 08:00 AM
  #481  
Gets Weekends Off
Veteran: Air Force
Line Holder
200 Countries Visited
 
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 3,378
Likes: 74
Default

Originally Posted by notEnuf
So if the A positions are not awarded, then they will not be offered to new hires, right? The language addresses FO positions unassigned. So how will these positions be filled? Can't find any language to address this.
I would guess they re-poat them on the next AE and hope for, in the words of Borat, "great success."
Reply
Old 05-22-2017 | 08:02 AM
  #482  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 20,877
Likes: 194
Default

Originally Posted by tunes
reason given is 'training waterfall' you know, something they should have known about before posting 160 positions.....but i guess we shall see tomorrow.
Actually it's not something they should have known nor is it a big concern. Until they know the exact mix of short verses long course pilots bidding into the 350 category they will not know how many crews they can train. The bid was posted using a high assumption for short course slots. If they don't get enough 330 guys bidding over they will reduce the awards.
At that point they will look for offsite capacity and post a cleanup bid if available sim time can be located.
Reply
Old 05-22-2017 | 08:03 AM
  #483  
notEnuf's Avatar
Racketeer
 
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 13,332
Likes: 822
From: N60.4858 W149.9327
Default

Originally Posted by FL370esq
I would guess they re-poat them on the next AE and hope for, in the words of Borat, "great success."
I get that but I don't want to see "new to Delta" pilots denied this opportunity at the discretion of the company. If they meet the FARs they should be awarded the position they bid. Contract compliance is a lot to ask, I realize.

The result of reduced rewards is a perpetual bid larger than is needed to get the result they are looking for, rather than make the positions more attractive.
Reply
Old 05-22-2017 | 08:08 AM
  #484  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,353
Likes: 54
From: 765A
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun
Actually it's not something they should have known nor is it a big concern. Until they know the exact mix of short verses long course pilots bidding into the 350 category they will not know how many crews they can train. The bid was posted using a high assumption for short course slots. If they don't get enough 330 guys bidding over they will reduce the awards.
At that point they will look for offsite capacity and post a cleanup bid if available sim time can be located.
On the other hand, there are airplanes being delivered over the next year. They will need crews. They may not award all 160 A350 crews, but I bet they come pretty close.
Reply
Old 05-22-2017 | 08:17 AM
  #485  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 4,563
Likes: 21
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun
Actually it's not something they should have known nor is it a big concern. Until they know the exact mix of short verses long course pilots bidding into the 350 category they will not know how many crews they can train. The bid was posted using a high assumption for short course slots. If they don't get enough 330 guys bidding over they will reduce the awards.
At that point they will look for offsite capacity and post a cleanup bid if available sim time can be located.
i'm obviously no expert but i believe they were more counting on the 747 pilots to bid over to the 350 and they didnt get the desired result so changing the numbers.
Reply
Old 05-22-2017 | 08:22 AM
  #486  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2016
Posts: 393
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by tunes
i'm obviously no expert but i believe they were more counting on the 747 pilots to bid over to the 350 and they didnt get the desired result so changing the numbers.
Too many 747 guys bid 88A positions
Reply
Old 05-22-2017 | 08:36 AM
  #487  
Gets Weekends Off
Veteran: Air Force
Line Holder
200 Countries Visited
 
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 3,378
Likes: 74
Default

Originally Posted by notEnuf
I get that but I don't want to see "new to Delta" pilots denied this opportunity at the discretion of the company. If they meet the FARs they should be awarded the position they bid. Contract compliance is a lot to ask, I realize.

The result of reduced rewards is a perpetual bid larger than is needed to get the result they are looking for, rather than make the positions more attractive.
The contra-argument is that the PWA does not require the company to offer unfilled positions to new hires. The PWA says "may" versus "shall." Unfilled Capt positions were probably beyond the realm of consideration when the PWA language was drafted which is why the current language only addresses unfilled FO positions.
Reply
Old 05-22-2017 | 08:49 AM
  #488  
notEnuf's Avatar
Racketeer
 
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 13,332
Likes: 822
From: N60.4858 W149.9327
Default

Originally Posted by FL370esq
The contra-argument is that the PWA does not require the company to offer unfilled positions to new hires. The PWA says "may" versus "shall." Unfilled Capt positions were probably beyond the realm of consideration when the PWA language was drafted which is why the current language only addresses unfilled FO positions.
Yup, but they still need to attract pilots for these positions, internally then. More June - August vacation weeks, better trips, more schedule flexibility, and of course more pay would do it. Instead they attempt to limit sick usage and get rid of shorter trips that lend themselves to flexibility.

Swapping, dropping and adding 4+ day trips is nearly impossible. Add the removal of open time for OE and the schedule has more value than the pay for FOs considering upgrade. Reap what you sow.
Reply
Old 05-22-2017 | 09:06 AM
  #489  
Gets Weekends Off
Liked
25M+ Airline Miles
Line Holder
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 12,833
Likes: 172
From: window seat
Default

Originally Posted by astroglider
Their Optimizer schedule builder has made the NB categories so awful nobody wants to bid them. This push they have for less system credit will cost them money in the end.
This is a huge part of it. The spastic "just in time" MBA trend of mandatory plane changes also plays a role. Looks good on paper, and that's all that matters.
Reply
Old 05-22-2017 | 09:07 AM
  #490  
Gets Weekends Off
Veteran: Air Force
Line Holder
200 Countries Visited
 
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 3,378
Likes: 74
Default

Originally Posted by notEnuf
Yup, but they still need to attract pilots for these positions, internally then. More June - August vacation weeks, better trips, more schedule flexibility, and of course more pay would do it. Instead they attempt to limit sick usage and get rid of shorter trips that lend themselves to flexibility.

Swapping, dropping and adding 4+ day trips is nearly impossible. Add the removal of open time for OE and the schedule has more value than the pay for FOs considering upgrade. Reap what you sow.
I agree....once it gets bad enough, things will change. However, I don't think a few (rumored to be) "unfilled" M88A/B717A vacancies are causing the company to rethink things at this point.

We'll have a better idea once the award is posted. Definitely interesting times, that's for sure. 😊
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices