Quote:
Originally Posted by gloopy
What others said, plus since NYC consists of JFK and EWR as well (lolright?) that average should be an easy number to reach, assuming marketing agrees.
That said, I really hope they reign it in for at least a couple quarters to shorter routes and more frequent passes through crew bases and its MX hubs. There is no way Swiss and Baltic could possibly have put it through its paces the way DL will, and it remains a very young and unproven (from a dispatch reliability POV) machine as well as the most technologically advanced and ambitious thing to ever come out of the country since they tried their hand at beer and we all know how that one turned out.
Really? Are you sure about that? While it can fly 5+ hour flights, I read SWISS has had many CSeries flying up to 12 sectors per day (most short 30-60 min flights) including steep approach flights into London City. We’re talking 6-8 daily flights into that airport from Zurich and Geneva with its steep approach and short runway which can be punishing on any airframe. It is also used to fly into Florence, Italy which also has a short runway. Watch this SWISS CS100 landing at LCY:
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=eG1fc8ehOA8
Based on my conversations with Swiss pilots actually flying the airplane, it handles it very well and it is a very reliable airplane after ironing out the initial and expected launch-customer kinks. No doubt we will benefit from the lessons learned at SWISS and Air Baltic... SWISS was so happy with its initial CS100 purchases that it changed the order mix from 15/15 100s and 300s to 10/20 100s and 300s. The CASM and performance on the CS300 is hard to beat!