Notices

100 321 NEO Order

Old 12-15-2017 | 12:24 PM
  #101  
Tinpusher007's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,808
Likes: 27
From: 330 B
Default

Originally Posted by Milk Man
What about the 330-800 NEO, says 257 seats with 7500 nm range.
It's a bit heavy. Shrinks always have CASM issues. The 787-8 is more efficient in this size class.
Reply
Old 12-15-2017 | 12:33 PM
  #102  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 20,877
Likes: 194
Default

Originally Posted by Milk Man
What about the 330-800 NEO, says 257 seats with 7500 nm range.
It's not a very efficient airframe for 257 seats, I think they have sold like two. Nevertheless I think the 330-900 may end up the 767ER replacement for Delta.
Reply
Old 12-15-2017 | 04:41 PM
  #103  
Denny Crane's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 6,971
Likes: 0
From: Kickin’ Back
Default

Originally Posted by Xray678
Yes I was here when that happened. I thought it was a mistake to match the rates. Two thoughts, the ER rate was too low to begin with and that has never been addressed. Second, getting the rate to where it should be will be hard since the category flies far more 757 time than ER time. The ER rate is only $10 more than the 739, but $36 less than the 764. Do you really think it’s an appropriate wide body rate? IMHO it’s an appropriate rate for the 757, but the ER should pay $15-20 more.
I am not arguing about any of what you say above. As a matter of fact, if you reread my last sentence, you should have the answer to your question.

What I’m so tired of hearing is the FALSE claim that the 757, 762, and 763 were NOT brought up to the 7ER rate. Like you claimed. If you were here, you know that is patently a false claim and it detracts from any further argument you make.

If you were around for that, then you were around when 738 and 777 payrates were negotiated. If I remember correctly, we have United to thank for the rates negotiated at the time. I will agree we, as a union, have not done a good job of negotiating the 7er pay rate (among others like the M88).

Denny
Reply
Old 12-15-2017 | 04:43 PM
  #104  
Denny Crane's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 6,971
Likes: 0
From: Kickin’ Back
Default

Originally Posted by TED74
Can anyone point me to the table that shows what issues pilots are allowed to have an opinion on, as a function of their hire date?
We are not talking about an opinion here. We are talking about fact. So what you say above has no bearing on anything being discussed.

Edit: I should say the item being discussed is the very specific question as to whether the payrates for the 757, 763, & 763 were brought up to the 7ER rates. If you weren’t here, I get how you might not understand how it went down. Don’t blame the playa, blame the game.

Denny

Last edited by Denny Crane; 12-15-2017 at 05:13 PM.
Reply
Old 12-15-2017 | 04:57 PM
  #105  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
From: A-320 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by BobZ
So this aligns fleets for an acquistion i guess?

Hey...if wer stirring the pot lets really stir it!

Lax 321N opening on feb bid. Heard it here 1st.

Any reason LAX is not currently a 320 base?
Reply
Old 12-15-2017 | 05:04 PM
  #106  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 1,034
Likes: 2
From: I got into this business so I wouldn't have to work.
Default

Originally Posted by BusCapt
Any reason LAX is not currently a 320 base?
Networking says it doesn't need to be.

Next question?
Reply
Old 12-15-2017 | 07:55 PM
  #107  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 5,146
Likes: 112
Default

Originally Posted by Denny Crane
We are not talking about an opinion here.
Not to get too particular, but you actually were talking about an opinion, and whether one was or wasn't "qualified to have one."

No biggie...I don't have an opinion, so worry not.
Reply
Old 12-15-2017 | 09:17 PM
  #108  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 275
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Denny Crane
I am not arguing about any of what you say above. As a matter of fact, if you reread my last sentence, you should have the answer to your question.

What I’m so tired of hearing is the FALSE claim that the 757, 762, and 763 were NOT brought up to the 7ER rate. Like you claimed. If you were here, you know that is patently a false claim and it detracts from any further argument you make.

If you were around for that, then you were around when 738 and 777 payrates were negotiated. If I remember correctly, we have United to thank for the rates negotiated at the time. I will agree we, as a union, have not done a good job of negotiating the 7er pay rate (among others like the M88).

Denny
Almost. Company wanted 777 really bad, and union said $300 per hour. Company laughed, a year later we signed 777 at 300 an hour. Then UAL took that number and applied it to their 1999 contract all the way down to their 737. We in turn for contract 2k asked for UAL +1% and we got it. Contract 2000 UAL +1% was with Malone.
Reply
Old 12-15-2017 | 10:48 PM
  #109  
Denny Crane's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 6,971
Likes: 0
From: Kickin’ Back
Default

Originally Posted by TED74
Not to get too particular, but you actually were talking about an opinion, and whether one was or wasn't "qualified to have one."

No biggie...I don't have an opinion, so worry not.
No, it’s not an opinion. What don’t you get? It is a fact that the payrates for the 757, 762, and 763 were raised to the payrate of the 7ER. It really is as simple as that.

Do you think when the payrates were harmonized into one that the 7ER rate was lowered? Rhetorical question. It wasn’t. Tell me, where is there a chance for an opinion here? I don’t see it.

Denny

Edit: Whoops, I did say “opinion” in my previous post. What I really meant was if you weren’t here and living thru it, you probably don’t know what happened (and probably didn’t care) in as great a depth as someone who was an active pilot on the list then.
Reply
Old 12-15-2017 | 10:50 PM
  #110  
Denny Crane's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 6,971
Likes: 0
From: Kickin’ Back
Default

Originally Posted by snowdawg
Almost. Company wanted 777 really bad, and union said $300 per hour. Company laughed, a year later we signed 777 at 300 an hour. Then UAL took that number and applied it to their 1999 contract all the way down to their 737. We in turn for contract 2k asked for UAL +1% and we got it. Contract 2000 UAL +1% was with Malone.
Thanks for the reminder.

Denny
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Kapitanleutnant
Foreign
0
04-11-2015 07:32 AM
A.FLOOR
Major
5
03-03-2015 02:31 PM
VictorAW
Major
93
11-24-2014 01:54 PM
Soyathink
Cargo
45
03-04-2007 04:47 PM
WatchThis!
Major
8
04-01-2006 08:57 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices