Get rid of Virtual Basing!
#61
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 20,880
Likes: 194
That’s not even close to how the process works. The company gave us lots of improvements in the last contract. You are saying the company has to make more improvements in those areas or the mediator will turn on them. Mediators and the negotiating teams work off terms sheets that are costed out to the dime. In the end cost is the driving force.
#62
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 20,880
Likes: 194
#63
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 2,960
Likes: 0
From: Power top
That’s not even close to how the process works. The company gave us lots of improvements in the last contract. You are saying the company has to make more improvements in those areas or the mediator will turn on them. Mediators and the negotiating teams work off terms sheets that are costed out to the dime. In the end cost is the driving force.
#64
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 5,150
Likes: 116
First off, I think virtual bases are a bad idea. I am domicile based at the moment, so I have that bias. But is it not true that even folks who aren't home based in the virtual base would see the benefits of positive space commuting on the front and back? I am not advocating for it, but I want to understand all of the benefits and detractors.
#65
As a commuter... No to VBs. No no no...
There is no win-win. The company's win is less pilots(bad for us) and less credit(bad for us). The ONLY benefit is for a small number who will be temporarily home based in the busy months at the expense of all the rest of the pilots.
There is no win-win. The company's win is less pilots(bad for us) and less credit(bad for us). The ONLY benefit is for a small number who will be temporarily home based in the busy months at the expense of all the rest of the pilots.
#66
The only way they would open a VB is if it saves money and pilots. VB's have been around forever and never has a pilot group spent negotiating capital to implement it. It is a concession overall, plain and simple.
#67
Again, benefit the few at the expense of the many. In your GS scenario, the system wide # of GS's would go down because of increased efficiency. Saving the company money and pilots.
#68
In both cases, I am on the fence. I think the jobs issue is way overblown though. jmho
#69
Denny
#70
Denny
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



