Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Get rid of Virtual Basing! >

Get rid of Virtual Basing!

Search
Notices

Get rid of Virtual Basing!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-08-2018, 07:04 AM
  #71  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,307
Default

Originally Posted by Hank Kingsley View Post
Would the company like international VB? How are they going to get one ?
If I were management and wanted more point to point international service from mid sized cities like IND and AUS and felt pilot costs would be excessive I would do as has been done in the past with the carrot approach. A signed order as a example for 30 787’s contingent on VB’s for ocean crossing. Perhaps 1 VB base for each 3 airframes delivered.
They won’t get it in the next contract just by asking for it nor does this test set any precident in the next contract. As I have mentioned much ado about nothing. VB’s will die a natural death.
sailingfun is offline  
Old 02-08-2018, 07:06 AM
  #72  
Gets Weekends Off
 
JamesBond's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2015
Position: A350 Both
Posts: 7,292
Default

Originally Posted by Denny Crane View Post
And I would disagree with that. Its been my experience that most green slips are awarded during the morning of the the day prior. Yes there are exceptions to that for popup trips but to make a blanket statement that 80% cannot get a GS because they commute is wrong.

Denny
I said they have little shot. But the vast majority of greenslips go to the same handful of guys. At least in my category that is the case. I'm not complaining, just stating a fact.

The greenslip system is designed to benefit the very senior. The only way to short circuit that is to live in a highly commuted to base, and then you will get the short notice GSs. In a purely international category, skeds usually has the advance warning to be able to cover the vast majority of GSs the day prior because that's when the crew shortage occurs rather than short notice like domestic. Jmo, but in watching my category the last 18 years that is seemingly the way it is.
JamesBond is offline  
Old 02-08-2018, 07:07 AM
  #73  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,307
Default

Originally Posted by JamesBond View Post
I could make the argument that greenslips only benefit those that live in base. The something like 80% of NY based pilots have little shot at greenslips because they don't live there.
The pilot who had 234 hours last month living in FL might disagree with you! Probably a majority of international GS’s in NYC are assigned the day prior or early the day off.
sailingfun is offline  
Old 02-08-2018, 07:07 AM
  #74  
Gets Weekends Off
 
JamesBond's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2015
Position: A350 Both
Posts: 7,292
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun View Post
If I were management and wanted more point to point international service from mid sized cities like IND and AUS and felt pilot costs would be excessive I would do as has been done in the past with the carrot approach. A signed order as a example for 30 787’s contingent on VB’s for ocean crossing. Perhaps 1 VB base for each 3 airframes delivered.
They won’t get it in the next contract just by asking for it nor does this test set any precident in the next contract. As I have mentioned much ado about nothing. VB’s will die a natural death.
Signed orders can be changed. They have these slimy things called lawyers that change them. Until they are sitting on the ramp with Delta on the side it isn't in the inventory.
JamesBond is offline  
Old 02-08-2018, 07:08 AM
  #75  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: Left seat of a little plane
Posts: 2,399
Default

Originally Posted by Denny Crane View Post
I tend to agree with you here. IMO the bigger problem is Temporary Duty. THIS will do more to cut down on green slips and manning than anything I can think of........ It's like allowing a VB in an existing base......something the Union has not allowed in the VB LOA.

Denny
My understanding of TDY is that it has far better received (by the pilot group) at airlines that have them than VBs. PS travel to/from, plus a hotel at company expense. It is all in the details.

Sent from my SM-G892U using Tapatalk
Herkflyr is offline  
Old 02-08-2018, 07:09 AM
  #76  
Gets Weekends Off
 
JamesBond's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2015
Position: A350 Both
Posts: 7,292
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun View Post
The pilot who had 234 hours last month living in FL might disagree with you! Probably a majority of international GS’s in NYC are assigned the day prior or early the day off.
Fine. GSs all around. Wooo hooo. I am holding my breath because mine is surely in the phone line right now. Can't wait to get 234 hours like apparently everybody else is doing.

And was he/she really 'living' in Florida?
JamesBond is offline  
Old 02-08-2018, 07:15 AM
  #77  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Denny Crane's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2008
Position: Kickin’ Back
Posts: 6,971
Default

Originally Posted by Herkflyr View Post
My understanding of TDY is that it has far better received (by the pilot group) at airlines that have them than VBs. PS travel to/from, plus a hotel at company expense. It is all in the details.

Sent from my SM-G892U using Tapatalk
Well, I see it as giving the company the flexibility to "right size" every base every month for a few hotel rooms. I don't like it...

Denny
Denny Crane is offline  
Old 02-08-2018, 07:17 AM
  #78  
Gets Weekends Off
 
JamesBond's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2015
Position: A350 Both
Posts: 7,292
Default

Originally Posted by Denny Crane View Post
Well, I see it as giving the company the flexibility to "right size" every base every month for a few hotel rooms. I don't like it...

Denny
I'd rather see us protect international domicile flying for those that are based there. If it originates in a domicile, and there is a category there that flies it, those pilots should be doing that flying. Flights that originate out of a domicile are up for grabs.
JamesBond is offline  
Old 02-08-2018, 07:23 AM
  #79  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Denny Crane's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2008
Position: Kickin’ Back
Posts: 6,971
Default

Originally Posted by JamesBond View Post
I'd rather see us protect international domicile flying for those that are based there. If it originates in a domicile, and there is a category there that flies it, those pilots should be doing that flying. Flights that originate out of a domicile are up for grabs.
Allowing Temporary Duty could lead to that as well as a massive reduction in overtime (especially during the summer) and fewer pilots needed. TD basically gives the company a flexible reserve contingent that can be moved around from base to base every month.........domestic or international.

Denny
Denny Crane is offline  
Old 02-08-2018, 07:24 AM
  #80  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2015
Posts: 3,117
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun View Post
VB’s will die a natural death.
The current Crew Resources newsletter seems to support this but I go back to my previous question from a while ago....

Whose term sheet was the VB first on?
FL370esq is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Halo Honk
Delta
10
11-14-2017 07:27 AM
CLazarus
United
77
12-20-2016 08:02 PM
TAprocon
Delta
54
10-14-2016 02:01 AM
gzsg
Delta
43
08-10-2016 09:24 AM
PilotFrog
Delta
63
06-27-2016 08:07 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices