Search

Notices

DALPA C19 Survey

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-30-2018 | 09:23 PM
  #21  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 458
Likes: 1
From: 320B
Default

I’m amazed the union keeps asking all these pension questions! Hello! Nobody wants one!!!

Did anyone else look at medical coverage of the other airlines in contract comparison? Our premiums and deductibles are WAY higher than everyone else.

How about 20% DC contribution, improvements to medical (lower premiums and lower deductibles) and forget the idea of a pension. The union has lost what the pilot group wants in a big way. Everyone please fill out the survey!
Reply
Old 08-30-2018 | 09:36 PM
  #22  
Denny Crane's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 6,971
Likes: 0
From: Kickin’ Back
Default

Originally Posted by TurbineDriver
I’m amazed the union keeps asking all these pension questions! Hello! Nobody wants one!!!

Hello! You are wrong!

Did anyone else look at medical coverage of the other airlines in contract comparison? Our premiums and deductibles are WAY higher than everyone else.

Agreed.

How about 20% DC contribution, improvements to medical (lower premiums and lower deductibles) and forget the idea of a pension. The union has lost what the pilot group wants in a big way. Everyone please fill out the survey!
As someone mentioned in another thread, that extra 5% would mean more money in your pocket if it was in a 9% pay raise instead of a 4% raise and 5% more DC. I’d rather take it in a raise.

Forget the 20% DC and lets go with a new DB... See, I can play that game too! I do agree with your desire for improvements to medical. I would carry it further to include Medicare supplemental insurance after turning 65......dare I say retirement medical....

Yes, please everyone take the survey.

Denny
Reply
Old 08-30-2018 | 10:59 PM
  #23  
Trip7's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 6,145
Likes: 204
Default

Originally Posted by Planetrain
Not directed necessarily at you trip, but what is the preoccupation with 20% DC? (Or any DC increase?) An equivalent raise accomplishes the same thing and more.

A 4% raise plus a 4% DC increase is worth less than an 8% straight raise.
Good point.

20% DC is just a number right now where based on current rates most pilots will meet the IRS Company Contribution Max without contributing a dime of their own money.

The goal for many is to get DC to a point where that becomes a reality for every pilot.
Reply
Old 08-30-2018 | 11:10 PM
  #24  
80ktsClamp's Avatar
Da Hudge
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 17,473
Likes: 0
From: Poodle Whisperer
Default

Let’s make medical contributions and deductibles less stupid while we’re going that route, Trip.
Reply
Old 08-30-2018 | 11:33 PM
  #25  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,370
Likes: 0
From: 737 FO
Default

Originally Posted by Denny Crane
As someone mentioned in another thread, that extra 5% would mean more money in your pocket if it was in a 9% pay raise instead of a 4% raise and 5% more DC. I’d rather take it in a raise.

Forget the 20% DC and lets go with a new DB... See, I can play that game too! I do agree with your desire for improvements to medical. I would carry it further to include Medicare supplemental insurance after turning 65......dare I say retirement medical....

Yes, please everyone take the survey.

Denny
I actually have a couple reasons it could be advantageous to have the money in DB.

First, the increase is likely going to be based on a monetary value, not a percentage. So you aren't going to see a larger increase by having the percentages all in a raise.

Secondly, contract comparison is normally done using the base hourly pay rates.

Just like previous discussions involving the profit sharing advantage going away after one contract cycle once combined into rates, the same thing would happen here. The more places we put money that are not in the base pay rates, the easier it will be to keep the advantage in upcoming contract cycles as other airlines increase their base pay.
Reply
Old 08-31-2018 | 12:32 AM
  #26  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,206
Likes: 0
From: DAL FO
Default

Originally Posted by Denny Crane
Agree to disagree.

I would prefer to have multiple income streams in retirement.

Denny
Multiple income streams? Great! Use your excess DC to fund investments that produce them - in your own name, under your control. It could be as simple as a dividend producing index fund in a brokerage account. You don’t have to go all crazy and become a slumlord.

But for sure, find one that gets a good return for $ invested. IMO annuities do not qualify.

Pensions fall even lower on the scale of places I want “my” money (it’s not yours, but you already learned that lesson once). Whatever it is, it’s always better to have it under your control and not a promise from Delta.

My point was not to restart this conversation, since we all know where we stand. The point is the MEC keeps asking the same question which means they must not be getting the answer they want to support Bartells’ land grab. They’ll keep asking apparently until they find a way to justify it, which others on this thread have rightly pointed out will likely result in a drawn out stalemate while more “deadZoners” retire.

Don’t worry though, Jerry will be along soon to tell us all how the ponies and 5 years of full retro are achievable with zero concessions. Cause don’t you know, this MEC is a well oiled machine!?!

Oh, and yes to healthcare improvement. I’d even support some retiree healthcare provisions and that would be less likely to vanish, just so you don’t think I’m an a$$ that doesn’t care about you or other pilots approaching retirement.
Reply
Old 08-31-2018 | 01:55 AM
  #27  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,206
Likes: 0
From: DAL FO
Default

Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
Let’s make medical contributions and deductibles less stupid while we’re going that route, Trip.
Totally agree with this. More tax free (sheltered) money could be found by having the company contribute to IRS max’s into the HSA - this would offset the “high deductible” requirement of these accounts.

For those that don’t opt for the HSA, or can’t due to TriCare, provide a plussed up (similar to DPMA excess) equivalent benefit.

Also, take Per Diem to the IRS max per location and any other tax advantaged angle we can find. With less pilots itemizing due to the new tax setup, in 2018 and beyond, this becomes even more valuable.
Reply
Old 08-31-2018 | 05:18 AM
  #28  
Banned
 
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 314
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by LeineLodge
Multiple income streams? Great! Use your excess DC to fund investments that produce them - in your own name, under your control. It could be as simple as a dividend producing index fund in a brokerage account. You don’t have to go all crazy and become a slumlord.

But for sure, find one that gets a good return for $ invested. IMO annuities do not qualify.

Pensions fall even lower on the scale of places I want “my” money (it’s not yours, but you already learned that lesson once). Whatever it is, it’s always better to have it under your control and not a promise from Delta.

My point was not to restart this conversation, since we all know where we stand. The point is the MEC keeps asking the same question which means they must not be getting the answer they want to support Bartells’ land grab. They’ll keep asking apparently until they find a way to justify it, which others on this thread have rightly pointed out will likely result in a drawn out stalemate while more “deadZoners” retire.

Don’t worry though, Jerry will be along soon to tell us all how the ponies and 5 years of full retro are achievable with zero concessions. Cause don’t you know, this MEC is a well oiled machine!?!

Oh, and yes to healthcare improvement. I’d even support some retiree healthcare provisions and that would be less likely to vanish, just so you don’t think I’m an a$$ that doesn’t care about you or other pilots approaching retirement.
Bingo. It’s like you’re the voice inside my head.
Reply
Old 08-31-2018 | 05:30 AM
  #29  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2015
Posts: 557
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Trip7
*Begin survey*

Increase DC to 20%

Provide optional investment vehicles/education for use of DC Excess Cash

*End survey*
That’s what I said too. Interesting to see a few of the other opinions though - didn’t hit submit yet.

Last edited by BigHitterLlama; 08-31-2018 at 05:56 AM.
Reply
Old 08-31-2018 | 06:02 AM
  #30  
Moderator
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 7,252
Likes: 95
From: DAL 330
Default

Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
Let’s make medical contributions and deductibles less stupid while we’re going that route, Trip.



You had me at "less."


Scoop
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
kscheers
Career Questions
0
06-05-2018 05:27 PM
gzsg
Delta
10297
07-10-2015 01:42 PM
RockBottom
Major
15
07-05-2006 07:44 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices