Search

Notices

S3A

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-28-2019 | 06:57 AM
  #201  
Moderator
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 7,252
Likes: 95
From: DAL 330
Default

Originally Posted by Mesabah
What does any of this have to do with scope? The change was for preventing bumping passengers. Delta management could have put any vendor ahead of other employee groups on the flight benefits, not just regional airlines.
You are correct it is thread drift but it is important to set the record straight. The non-rev issue is easy. Folks going to work have priority besides that stick with the traditional priorities.

Scoop
Reply
Old 08-28-2019 | 06:57 AM
  #202  
UGBSM's Avatar
FlySmarterNotHarder
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 596
Likes: 1
From: fifi flyer
Default

Originally Posted by NeverFlexTO
Wrong, how does DL lose money if a 9E employees family can’t get somewhere vs a retiree? No cost to Delta at all! I’d argue again that pilots choose to commute, they shouldn’t be rewarded with higher priority because of personal choices they make.
Exactly. A "working crew member" flying around equals deadhead positive space. A commuter is not a "working crew member". It is voluntary flying just like flying around to visit grandma. Use the jumpseat. Non rev is for personal travel. My personal travel is just as important as your personal travel. Don't care if you are going to work or not, thats on you.
Reply
Old 08-28-2019 | 07:03 AM
  #203  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2017
Posts: 271
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Mesabah
What does any of this have to do with scope? The change was for preventing bumping passengers. Delta management could have put any vendor ahead of other employee groups on the flight benefits, not just regional airlines.
There wasn't a single 9E pilot that asked for S3A. Delta did that on their own. Understanding why leads us right back to scope. I see why you'd want to avoid the subject, but scope is the ultimate cause. Wouldn't have passengers being bumped by PS commuters if there weren't thousands of contractors flying Delta passengers. Wouldn't have thousands of contractors without selling scope. I'm not trying to be vindictive, but the degradation of their non-contractual benefits was ultimately their own doing.
Reply
Old 08-28-2019 | 07:51 AM
  #204  
:-)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,339
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Shadre Reevis
There wasn't a single 9E pilot that asked for S3A. Delta did that on their own. Understanding why leads us right back to scope. I see why you'd want to avoid the subject, but scope is the ultimate cause. Wouldn't have passengers being bumped by PS commuters if there weren't thousands of contractors flying Delta passengers. Wouldn't have thousands of contractors without selling scope. I'm not trying to be vindictive, but the degradation of their non-contractual benefits was ultimately their own doing.
There was not a scope sales. Comair tried to steal Delta pilot's seniority because they had ALPA merger policy on their side.

The RLA doesn't protect you against code share, I would have done the same thing as Delta pilot's if I were in their shoes, unfortunately.
Reply
Old 08-28-2019 | 08:11 AM
  #205  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2017
Posts: 271
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Mesabah
There was not a scope sales. Comair tried to steal Delta pilot's seniority because they had ALPA merger policy on their side.

The RLA doesn't protect you against code share, I would have done the same thing as Delta pilot's if I were in their shoes, unfortunately.
I’m afraid I don’t understand the relevance of the Comair reference.

As for the rest, I am not here to hang DL pilots for selling scope. That dead horse has been well beaten. I would only say that DL pilots should understand the consequences of their voting decision in regards to scope. Just because they couldn’t foresee the full consequences doesn’t make it anyone else’s fault.

Instead of complaining here and telling 9E crews their families don't matter (not directed at you), come up with a solution that makes business sense to Delta. Business is what prompted DL's decision to implement S3A in the first place.
Reply
Old 08-28-2019 | 08:30 AM
  #206  
:-)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,339
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Shadre Reevis
I’m afraid I don’t understand the relevance of the Comair reference.

As for the rest, I am not here to hang DL pilots for selling scope. That dead horse has been well beaten. I would only say that DL pilots should understand the consequences of their voting decision in regards to scope. Just because they couldn’t foresee the full consequences doesn’t make it anyone else’s fault.

Instead of complaining here and telling 9E crews their families don't matter (not directed at you), come up with a solution that makes business sense to Delta. Business is what prompted DL's decision to implement S3A in the first place.
Regional carriers were once stand alone air lines, that code shared with larger ones. For Delta pilots, the ONLY option to preserve scope was to force a merger. However, that still does not protect you from further code share. So, because Comair/ASA were ALPA, the merger would have been ALPA merger policy. In other words, Delta pilots would have gotten all the regional pilots, in perhaps a DOH SLI, with no guarantee the planes would be sticking around, and not pushed off to another codeshare.

So the choice was, permit branded regional flying in exchange for code share restrictions, or vacate their seat for a regional pilot.

In hindsight, the Delta pilots should have removed ALPA, and gone their own way. This would have prevented half of the bad stuff that happened to them in the following years.
Reply
Old 08-28-2019 | 08:36 AM
  #207  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2017
Posts: 271
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Mesabah
Regional carriers were once stand alone air lines, that code shared with larger ones. For Delta pilots, the ONLY option to preserve scope was to force a merger. However, that still does not protect you from further code share. So, because Comair/ASA were ALPA, the merger would have been ALPA merger policy. In other words, Delta pilots would have gotten all the regional pilots, in perhaps a DOH SLI, with no guarantee the planes would be sticking around, and not pushed off to another codeshare.

So the choice was, permit branded regional flying in exchange for code share restrictions, or vacate their seat for a regional pilot.

In hindsight, the Delta pilots should have removed ALPA, and gone their own way. This would have prevented half of the bad stuff that happened to them in the following years.
Thank you for explaining.
Reply
Old 08-28-2019 | 09:18 AM
  #208  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 851
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Shadre Reevis
I’m afraid I don’t understand the relevance of the Comair reference.

As for the rest, I am not here to hang DL pilots for selling scope. That dead horse has been well beaten. I would only say that DL pilots should understand the consequences of their voting decision in regards to scope. Just because they couldn’t foresee the full consequences doesn’t make it anyone else’s fault.

Instead of complaining here and telling 9E crews their families don't matter (not directed at you), come up with a solution that makes business sense to Delta. Business is what prompted DL's decision to implement S3A in the first place.
You are basically telling all our retirees they don't matter!
Reply
Old 08-28-2019 | 09:28 AM
  #209  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2017
Posts: 271
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by firstmob
You are basically telling all our retirees they don't matter!
Care to explain? And when you do, remember that zero 9E pilots asked for S3A or complained about retirees having flight benefits. Any beef you have should be taken up with your management.
Reply
Old 08-28-2019 | 09:52 AM
  #210  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 851
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Shadre Reevis
Care to explain? And when you do, remember that zero 9E pilots asked for S3A or complained about retirees having flight benefits. Any beef you have should be taken up with your management.
A little touchy you bring things up but don't want to discuss unless everyone agreesvwith you
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
preflight
Endeavor Air
56
05-11-2019 11:53 AM
musketeer
Endeavor Air
759
12-06-2018 09:00 AM
42jeff
Endeavor Air
20
05-28-2018 07:47 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices