Search
Notices

Massive 350A Bypass

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-24-2019, 07:18 PM
  #91  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Big E 757's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2013
Position: A320 Left seat
Posts: 2,580
Default

Originally Posted by Baradium View Post
I'm in a non 320 base but I got to fly with a lot of pilots from other bases thanks to the split rotations that they did this past summer. For others that ARE in my base, 320 has come up because there is talk of a 320 base opening and there definitely were actually a lot more than I expected that at least say right now they would not bid to it because of the pay. By more than expected, I only recall a single captain saying he would bid to the 320 if we got a base. Granted my category is quite small so the sample size isn't very big, but I was still expecting more than that.
I am on the 320, and I like the airplane, and I like the trips for the most part. In MSP, starting a 4 or 5 day trip with a LAS or PHX turn can start moving the fatigue-o-meter needle early in the trip, but aside from that, the trips are decent. Having said that, if I was on the 737, I wouldn’t even consider going to a full school, just to have a more (much more) comfortable cockpit. Even if the pay was the same, or a little more. But that’s just me. I used to enjoy learning a new airplane. Now, not so much.

It’s also sounds like you’ve got a little bit of expectation bias going on too. You seem to assume that a lot of 737 pilots might bid the 320, because of the roomier cockpit, and possibly because of the rumored Hawaii flying. I wouldn’t want to endure a month on VA Ave to switch from the 737 to the 320, and take a pay cut. But again, that’s just me.

I heard a rumor that one of the most senior 7ER Captains in LAX bid the 320 when it opened, thinking that the Hawaii flying was right around the corner. He was one of the first to convert, and found himself flying red-eyes to MEX, right out of the box, and is none too happy. It may be made up, but it made me laugh in sympathy.
Big E 757 is offline  
Old 11-24-2019, 07:30 PM
  #92  
Da Hudge
 
80ktsClamp's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: Poodle Whisperer
Posts: 17,473
Default

LAX 320 had a lot of people bid in with the expectation of HI flying, but got 70% redeye starts, primarily to MEX. My understanding is that all 3 of their LCA's bid out on this bid.
80ktsClamp is offline  
Old 11-24-2019, 09:18 PM
  #93  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Hawaii50's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Position: 757 Left
Posts: 1,306
Default

Originally Posted by Big E 757 View Post
I am on the 320, and I like the airplane, and I like the trips for the most part. In MSP, starting a 4 or 5 day trip with a LAS or PHX turn can start moving the fatigue-o-meter needle early in the trip, but aside from that, the trips are decent. Having said that, if I was on the 737, I wouldn’t even consider going to a full school, just to have a more (much more) comfortable cockpit. Even if the pay was the same, or a little more. But that’s just me. I used to enjoy learning a new airplane. Now, not so much.

It’s also sounds like you’ve got a little bit of expectation bias going on too. You seem to assume that a lot of 737 pilots might bid the 320, because of the roomier cockpit, and possibly because of the rumored Hawaii flying. I wouldn’t want to endure a month on VA Ave to switch from the 737 to the 320, and take a pay cut. But again, that’s just me.

I heard a rumor that one of the most senior 7ER Captains in LAX bid the 320 when it opened, thinking that the Hawaii flying was right around the corner. He was one of the first to convert, and found himself flying red-eyes to MEX, right out of the box, and is none too happy. It may be made up, but it made me laugh in sympathy.
He was an ultra-senior 73 captain.
Hawaii50 is offline  
Old 11-24-2019, 09:35 PM
  #94  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2006
Position: 737 FO
Posts: 2,370
Default

Originally Posted by Big E 757 View Post
I am on the 320, and I like the airplane, and I like the trips for the most part. In MSP, starting a 4 or 5 day trip with a LAS or PHX turn can start moving the fatigue-o-meter needle early in the trip, but aside from that, the trips are decent. Having said that, if I was on the 737, I wouldn’t even consider going to a full school, just to have a more (much more) comfortable cockpit. Even if the pay was the same, or a little more. But that’s just me. I used to enjoy learning a new airplane. Now, not so much.

It’s also sounds like you’ve got a little bit of expectation bias going on too. You seem to assume that a lot of 737 pilots might bid the 320, because of the roomier cockpit, and possibly because of the rumored Hawaii flying. I wouldn’t want to endure a month on VA Ave to switch from the 737 to the 320, and take a pay cut. But again, that’s just me.

I heard a rumor that one of the most senior 7ER Captains in LAX bid the 320 when it opened, thinking that the Hawaii flying was right around the corner. He was one of the first to convert, and found himself flying red-eyes to MEX, right out of the box, and is none too happy. It may be made up, but it made me laugh in sympathy.
The Hawaii flying topic does actually come up. Some of these pilots have no desire to do long haul international so they don't really want to fly the ER or 330. As I said, a number have said that the straw that breaks the camel's back as far as their potential decision is the pay cut. I'm only relaying what I am hearing from other pilots.
Baradium is offline  
Old 11-25-2019, 01:09 PM
  #95  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Denny Crane's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2008
Position: Kickin’ Back
Posts: 6,971
Default

Originally Posted by Baradium View Post
The Hawaii flying topic does actually come up. Some of these pilots have no desire to do long haul international so they don't really want to fly the ER or 330. As I said, a number have said that the straw that breaks the camel's back as far as their potential decision is the pay cut. I'm only relaying what I am hearing from other pilots.
Pay cut? Who’s talking of taking a pay cut?

Denny
Denny Crane is offline  
Old 11-25-2019, 01:51 PM
  #96  
seeing the large hubs...
 
iaflyer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: 73N A
Posts: 3,707
Default

Originally Posted by Denny Crane View Post
Pay cut? Who’s talking of taking a pay cut?
I think it's the A320 pay vs the B737 pay. The 320 is about $10 a hour less. (at 12 yr pay)
iaflyer is offline  
Old 11-25-2019, 01:57 PM
  #97  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2016
Position: Looking left
Posts: 3,260
Default

Originally Posted by iaflyer View Post
I think it's the A320 pay vs the B737 pay. The 320 is about $10 a hour less. (at 12 yr pay)
The 321 pays the same as the 900.

The $10 difference is between the the 320/319 and the 700/800
DWC CAP10 USAF is offline  
Old 11-25-2019, 03:19 PM
  #98  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2006
Position: 737 FO
Posts: 2,370
Default

Originally Posted by DWC CAP10 USAF View Post
The 321 pays the same as the 900.

The $10 difference is between the the 320/319 and the 700/800
That is correct, and there will be a lot of 321s eventually, but that's what they talk about.
Baradium is offline  
Old 11-25-2019, 10:39 PM
  #99  
Gets Weekends Off
 
saturn's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2012
Position: Supreme Allied Commander
Posts: 1,056
Default

Originally Posted by Baradium View Post
That is correct, and there will be a lot of 321s eventually, but that's what they talk about.
Sooo...banding 319/320 to 737-7/800s rates will free up gobs of training while stagnating seniority on the 320 cuz "now guys won't leave the 320 to fly the 737"? Close to nobody chooses to leave the 320 -> 737 just for $10hr on some variants. It's usually for trip quality, layovers, seniority%, etc.

319/320 should pay the same as the 737-700/800. Change my mind.
saturn is offline  
Old 11-26-2019, 06:41 AM
  #100  
Gets Weekends Off
 
JamesBond's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2015
Position: A350 Both
Posts: 7,292
Default

Originally Posted by JungleBus View Post
The one example of paybanding we have on property - the 757/767 - nobody seems to like much. Line consensus seems to be that the 757 dragged down the 767 rate


Originally Posted by JungleBus View Post
too much, and the 767 didn't raise the 757 rate enough.
I'll give you that. But I will bet there is little to no impetus to give a disproportionate raise to that category due to our pay methodology.... you know... to 'make it right'.
JamesBond is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
GoCats67
United
7
01-15-2019 09:08 PM
clearandcold
Part 135
1
02-09-2009 11:45 PM
allflight57
Technical
18
02-15-2008 10:09 AM
ScaryKite
Regional
11
04-06-2007 11:07 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices