Search
Notices

Massive 350A Bypass

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-26-2019, 03:14 PM
  #101  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2006
Position: 737 FO
Posts: 2,370
Default

Originally Posted by saturn View Post
Sooo...banding 319/320 to 737-7/800s rates will free up gobs of training while stagnating seniority on the 320 cuz "now guys won't leave the 320 to fly the 737"? Close to nobody chooses to leave the 320 -> 737 just for $10hr on some variants. It's usually for trip quality, layovers, seniority%, etc.

319/320 should pay the same as the 737-700/800. Change my mind.
The 737 pilots have to deal with the tighter cockpit, louder noises, yoke, 1950s overhead, and having to store bags in the closet.
Baradium is offline  
Old 11-26-2019, 04:08 PM
  #102  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2016
Posts: 2,544
Default

Originally Posted by Baradium View Post
The 737 pilots have to deal with the tighter cockpit, louder noises, yoke, 1950s overhead, and having to store bags in the closet.
Yeah, but they maintain total control of the airplane instead of being overridden by a computer. They don’t have to listen to fifi call them names. They don’t have to worry about thrust levers that move NO WHERE on their own. Plus, the tray table has too many settings and how am I supposed to choose where to put it?
Iceberg is offline  
Old 11-26-2019, 04:08 PM
  #103  
Gets Weekends Off
 
saturn's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2012
Position: Supreme Allied Commander
Posts: 1,055
Default

Originally Posted by Baradium View Post
The 737 pilots have to deal with the tighter cockpit, louder noises, yoke, 1950s overhead, and having to store bags in the closet.
Ok you win. Enjoy the raise.
saturn is offline  
Old 11-26-2019, 04:47 PM
  #104  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2017
Posts: 381
Default

Originally Posted by FL370esq View Post
Crazy, huh?

It looks weird because the Company only elected to fill 13 of the 14 posted vacancies (although one pilot exited the category so a total of 14 entered the category). The youngest pilot bypassed had an 11/2021 retirement date and a seniority # of 410 putting him/her pretty high on the list (#17 from the top and well before the first vacancy was even awarded). Therefore, his/her retirement date controlled the bypasses for this AE.

When the sen# 2376 pilot was awarded the the 14th of 15 vacancies (14 posted plus one contingent vacancy), there was still one more vacancy that could have been awarded. The next pilot with an AE (the 2400 sen#) was slated to retire in the conversion window so the Commodore 64 kept on plugging. The next pilot with an AE (2500 sen#) had a retirement date before 11/2021 so the exception to 22.E.13.b applied and that pilot was bypassed. The next pilot who could have filled the last vacancy had a retirement date after 11/2021 and therefore would not have been bypassed. For whatever reason though, the Company elected not to fill that last vacancy when they got to an eligible pilot. As a result, "technically" those last two pilots could have held that last vacancy but they were bypassed instead.
I’m confused as to what these two guys gain by being bypassed. Doesn’t the pay protection (ie moving up to 350 pay) only start once someone junior to them converts? If no one junior was awarded the position, there’s no one junior to convert and therefore no trigger for the pay increase. What am I missing here?
Go Cards go is offline  
Old 11-26-2019, 05:22 PM
  #105  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2015
Posts: 3,117
Default

Originally Posted by Go Cards go View Post
I’m confused as to what these two guys gain by being bypassed. Doesn’t the pay protection (ie moving up to 350 pay) only start once someone junior to them converts? If no one junior was awarded the position, there’s no one junior to convert and therefore no trigger for the pay increase. What am I missing here?
You are confusing bypass with the pay protection provision of 22.E.9. A bypassed pilot does not require training so he/she does not trigger pay protection for senior pilots. Basically, those two will convert in seniority order and receive A350 Capt pay from their conversion date thru retirement. Worst case scenario (latest possible conversion), the bottom pilot will receive A350 Captain pay for roughly 11 months while flying as a MSP320 Captain.
FL370esq is offline  
Old 11-26-2019, 07:32 PM
  #106  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2017
Posts: 381
Default

Originally Posted by FL370esq View Post
You are confusing bypass with the pay protection provision of 22.E.9. A bypassed pilot does not require training so he/she does not trigger pay protection for senior pilots. Basically, those two will convert in seniority order and receive A350 Capt pay from their conversion date thru retirement. Worst case scenario (latest possible conversion), the bottom pilot will receive A350 Captain pay for roughly 11 months while flying as a MSP320 Captain.
I see. 22.E.13 says they get the pay protection at the higher rate when they would have converted. I think that is determined when someone junior to them converts or in the case of these guys with no one junior to them it would happen at the end of the conversation window.
Go Cards go is offline  
Old 11-27-2019, 03:13 AM
  #107  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2015
Posts: 3,117
Default

Originally Posted by Go Cards go View Post
I see. 22.E.13 says they get the pay protection at the higher rate when they would have converted. I think that is determined when someone junior to them converts or in the case of these guys with no one junior to them it would happen at the end of the conversation window.
Not necessarily. The operative language of 22.E.13 that you cited to is: "...as of the date he would otherwise have been converted." What if they train the 14 pilots in the first four or five months of the window? The last 2 wouldn't have to wait till the end of the seven month window to be "converted" (and they are never actually "converted" because they are bypassed....they just start collecting A350 Capt pay).
FL370esq is offline  
Old 11-28-2019, 08:14 PM
  #108  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Cogf16's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2008
Position: VEOP Retired! 7ER A was last position
Posts: 978
Default

Originally Posted by saturn View Post
Sooo...banding 319/320 to 737-7/800s rates will free up gobs of training while stagnating seniority on the 320 cuz "now guys won't leave the 320 to fly the 737"? Close to nobody chooses to leave the 320 -> 737 just for $10hr on some variants. It's usually for trip quality, layovers, seniority%, etc.

319/320 should pay the same as the 737-700/800. Change my mind.
Ahhh less passengers carried.....and newer technology
Cogf16 is offline  
Old 12-01-2019, 04:15 AM
  #109  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2013
Position: A350 Captain (RET)
Posts: 149
Wink

Originally Posted by Iceberg View Post
Yeah, but they maintain total control of the airplane instead of being overridden by a computer. They don’t have to listen to fifi call them names. They don’t have to worry about thrust levers that move NO WHERE on their own. Plus, the tray table has too many settings and how am I supposed to choose where to put it?
You got that right.. also keep in mind the pain in the A$$ of having to put you coat in a closet in the cockpit, don't forget you can hear the captain whisper the name calling into his "hot mike" and oh oh, I almost forgot the comfort of not freezing in the winter or sweating in the summer. Why would anyone want to have a clean dry shirt at the end of the day.

Yes, it is scary not seeing the power levers move but actually seeing what the engines are doing.. like accelerating or decelerating.

And that modern technology thingy... what were they thinking when they designed a flight deck for today's environment! How dumb was it for Airbus to consult the folks from Saab to provide an ergonomically inviting cockpit. Shesh....Autobrake selection near the landing gear!!! Boy was that stupid, it should be hidden somewhere on the center console!

You are right about that tray table. I prefer to eat my meals with my plate in my lap... sort of reminds me of camping with the kids.

Airbus sucks...

Fly safe,

OC
OceanCrosser is offline  
Old 12-01-2019, 06:33 AM
  #110  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2018
Posts: 3,191
Default

Originally Posted by OceanCrosser View Post

Yes, it is scary not seeing the power levers move but actually seeing what the engines are doing.. like accelerating or decelerating.



OC
I hate to admit it, this being a public forum and all, but I don't watch the N1 gauges to see what the engines are doing....like accelerating or decelerating.......for the entire flight.....all 14 hours of it.

I think most would agree, the thrust levels moving provides a very useful peripheral secondary que as to engine setting/trend...like possibly approach to stall at high altitude and increasing temp situations.

I also think a yoke provides the same secondary que....and would be safer........but I certainly don't want to give up my tray table for that pesky yoke and a slightly safer cockpit

Calling a spade a spade.....just because it's Airbus doesn't mean it's ALL better. Don't want a yoke in the interest of safety but think thrust lever movement would be an idea worth considering

JMHO
Buck Rogers is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
GoCats67
United
7
01-15-2019 09:08 PM
clearandcold
Part 135
1
02-09-2009 11:45 PM
allflight57
Technical
18
02-15-2008 10:09 AM
ScaryKite
Regional
11
04-06-2007 11:07 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices