![]() |
I’ll be shocked if the great Mad Dog purge of 2020 doesn’t occur on a 365 day bid.
|
Originally Posted by Han Solo
(Post 2931428)
Standing by for Sailingfun to capitalize on one guy who makes an overly pessimistic prediction with a “but the forum said the sky was falling” post.
I'm standing by for ANY optimistic/positive post from the 2 year capt at the leading edge of the 5000 pilots Delta has hired:eek: Same thing, only different:D |
Originally Posted by Buck Rogers
(Post 2931459)
Rocks....glass houses?
I'm standing by for ANY optimistic/positive post from the 2 year capt at the leading edge of the 5000 pilots Delta has hired:eek: Same thing, only different:D |
Originally Posted by Buck Rogers
(Post 2931459)
Rocks....glass houses?
I'm standing by for ANY optimistic/positive post from the 2 year capt at the leading edge of the 5000 pilots Delta has hired:eek: Same thing, only different:D |
Originally Posted by FogSkier
(Post 2931458)
I’ll be shocked if the great Mad Dog purge of 2020 doesn’t occur on a 365 day bid.
You are correct that they will use a 365 day bid when they displace. Allows them to spread the displacements out and keep a displaced guy from one bid getting displaced by another pilot on the next bid. |
Originally Posted by CheapTrick
(Post 2931376)
The word at the last Training Base Meeting was that the next bid would not be a 365 bid nor did Crew Resources want anymore 365 bids.
|
Originally Posted by RockyBoy
(Post 2931631)
Heard the same thing other than they will use a 365 day bid when they need to close the 88 category which is a moving target.
|
From my understanding, the company can displace on a non-365 conversion AE, but if they want to use a 365 conversion window, it must contain displacements.
IMHO, a Jan 365 AE with displacements wouldn’t make sense....they would essentially lose the the ability to displace maddog folks between Feb and end of summer surge, which is when they have said they need them for. I would guess a mid/end summer 365 AE which would allow them the full 365 to displace folks. |
Originally Posted by DWC CAP10 USAF
(Post 2931641)
From my understanding, the company can displace on a non-365 conversion AE, but if they want to use a 365 conversion window, it must contain displacements.
|
Originally Posted by tennisguru
(Post 2931643)
Correct. They can displace on any and every AE they put out. In addition to requiring a displacement, a 365 day AE also can only be done once per calendar year.
|
Originally Posted by RockyBoy
(Post 2931630)
Hearing some rumblings of 320NEO getting pushed even further and this will result in keeping some ER’s and 88’s longer than planned.
You are correct that they will use a 365 day bid when they displace. Allows them to spread the displacements out and keep a displaced guy from one bid getting displaced by another pilot on the next bid. |
Originally Posted by Chakerik
(Post 2931768)
What's the current length of time for the neo delay? 6 months behind? A year?
|
Originally Posted by WakeWash
(Post 2931794)
And what exactly is the delay?? I keep hearing everything from engines to carpet... what’s the updated date of delivery for the first one?
|
Originally Posted by Big E 757
(Post 2931795)
The last announced delay was attributed to the cabin furnishings. I don’t know specifically what that means, but it’s not the engines, according to what I’ve heard.
|
Originally Posted by WakeWash
(Post 2931794)
And what exactly is the delay?? I keep hearing everything from engines to carpet... what’s the updated date of delivery for the first one?
Airbus CEO Guillaume Faury said “ “We are focused on the A320neo ramp-up and improving the industrial flow while managing the higher level of complexity on the A321 ACF in particular. Our nine-month delivery numbers and the updated delivery outlook for the year reflect the underlying actions to secure a more efficient delivery flow in the next years as we progress to rate 63 per month for the A320 Family in 2021.” Another statement from a airline CEO, Disappointed, as you've heard me say previously, with the performance of Airbus,” Walsh told investors during Q2 2019 earnings call on August 2, 2019. “Very poor delivery from Hamburg on the A321. It's not just for us, as you know. I'm sure by now you've heard every airline that is excited about taking the 321LR expect - express huge disappointment about the delays that they're encountering.” “We need Airbus to improve their performance, and they need to get working on that very quickly because, quite honestly, the delays that we're seeing are just completely unacceptable, and it is impacting on the growth plans that we have. |
Originally Posted by sailingfun
(Post 2931802)
Disappointed, as you've heard me say previously, with the performance of Airbus,” Walsh told investors during Q2 2019 earnings call on August 2, 2019. “Very poor delivery from Hamburg on the A321. It's not just for us, as you know. I'm sure by now you've heard every airline that is excited about taking the 321LR expect - express huge disappointment about the delays that they're encountering.”
“We need Airbus to improve their performance, and they need to get working on that very quickly because, quite honestly, the delays that we're seeing are just completely unacceptable, and it is impacting on the growth plans that we have. |
Originally Posted by sailingfun
(Post 2931437)
The strange thing is I have been the one to post that both the Nov and planned Jan bid will not be what some are posting. It’s unusual on here for me to be the pessimist.
The thing some however can’t seem to grasp was the big bid was intended to cover the flying into summer of 2020. The extra bids and changes since then have been because network has expanded our block hour plans quite a bit since CR posted the bid and Airbus continues to struggle on deliveries causing fleet mix changes. |
Originally Posted by Big E 757
(Post 2931919)
What I don’t understand is, I’m moving up 35-50 numbers a month on the seniority list, by virtue of retirements, and yet the number of Widebody A openings on the AE’s doesn’t seem to reflect the retirements. Call it 40 a month X 12. If half those retirements were widebody A’s, that’s 240 widebody captains that have left this year. There were quite a few openings on the Jan bid, and then 15 on this last bid. Have there been 240 Widebody captain positions posted this year? And I’m not talking backfills. Straight up posted vacancies only. If there were, that covers attrition only, we’ve taken delivery of several wide bodies this year too. Are the numbers keeping up with attrition? I feel that they haven’t and that’s why I’ve been expecting a big widebody A bid to be coming soon. Nov had 15, so I’m still expecting a big bid in Jan if they want to cover retirements and deliveries for next summer.
|
Originally Posted by Big E 757
(Post 2931919)
What I don’t understand is, I’m moving up 35-50 numbers a month on the seniority list, by virtue of retirements, and yet the number of Widebody A openings on the AE’s doesn’t seem to reflect the retirements. Call it 40 a month X 12. If half those retirements were widebody A’s, that’s 240 widebody captains that have left this year. There were quite a few openings on the Jan bid, and then 15 on this last bid. Have there been 240 Widebody captain positions posted this year? And I’m not talking backfills. Straight up posted vacancies only. If there were, that covers attrition only, we’ve taken delivery of several wide bodies this year too. Are the numbers keeping up with attrition? I feel that they haven’t and that’s why I’ve been expecting a big widebody A bid to be coming soon. Nov had 15, so I’m still expecting a big bid in Jan if they want to cover retirements and deliveries for next summer.
|
Originally Posted by Big E 757
(Post 2931919)
What I don’t understand is, I’m moving up 35-50 numbers a month on the seniority list, by virtue of retirements, and yet the number of Widebody A openings on the AE’s doesn’t seem to reflect the retirements. Call it 40 a month X 12. If half those retirements were widebody A’s, that’s 240 widebody captains that have left this year. There were quite a few openings on the Jan bid, and then 15 on this last bid. Have there been 240 Widebody captain positions posted this year? And I’m not talking backfills. Straight up posted vacancies only. If there were, that covers attrition only, we’ve taken delivery of several wide bodies this year too. Are the numbers keeping up with attrition? I feel that they haven’t and that’s why I’ve been expecting a big widebody A bid to be coming soon. Nov had 15, so I’m still expecting a big bid in Jan if they want to cover retirements and deliveries for next summer.
|
Originally Posted by MJP27
(Post 2931928)
I’m pretty sure there aren’t 40 widebody CAs retiring a month......
Yep, plenty of narrowbody As and all kinds of senior Bs retiring as well. |
I can't speak to the last 12 months but there are roughly 170 widebody A's retiring in the next 12 months. That's not counting 7er guys/gals. There are 109 7ER A's in the next 12 months. In that time there are 5-600 retirements total. Also, there are a lot of people retiring that are out sick, so they don't really have to replace them in a category.
|
Originally Posted by 4fans
(Post 2931944)
I can't speak to the last 12 months but there are roughly 170 widebody A's retiring in the next 12 months. That's not counting 7er guys/gals. There are 109 7ER A's in the next 12 months. In that time there are 5-600 retirements total. Also, there are a lot of people retiring that are out sick, so they don't really have to replace them in a category.
|
Originally Posted by Big E 757
(Post 2931919)
What I don’t understand is, I’m moving up 35-50 numbers a month on the seniority list, by virtue of retirements, and yet the number of Widebody A openings on the AE’s doesn’t seem to reflect the retirements. Call it 40 a month X 12. If half those retirements were widebody A’s, that’s 240 widebody captains that have left this year. There were quite a few openings on the Jan bid, and then 15 on this last bid. Have there been 240 Widebody captain positions posted this year? And I’m not talking backfills. Straight up posted vacancies only. If there were, that covers attrition only, we’ve taken delivery of several wide bodies this year too. Are the numbers keeping up with attrition? I feel that they haven’t and that’s why I’ve been expecting a big widebody A bid to be coming soon. Nov had 15, so I’m still expecting a big bid in Jan if they want to cover retirements and deliveries for next summer.
|
Originally Posted by sailingfun
(Post 2931802)
From the airbus CEO however I have no idea what it means.
. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MHdi2vktffE |
Originally Posted by Thruster
(Post 2931924)
Sailingfun can explain it to you
|
Originally Posted by MJP27
(Post 2931928)
I’m pretty sure there aren’t 40 widebody CAs retiring a month......
|
Originally Posted by sailingfun
(Post 2931946)
Keep in mind that retirements for a entire year were accounted for in the 12 months following the big bid closing. They also applied a unplanned attrition factor to those retirements.
|
Originally Posted by Big E 757
(Post 2932105)
So won’t they account for the next years retirements in the next 365 day AE?
They state they are not doing a big bid this year. They have however stated that in the past and ignored their own reasoning. |
Originally Posted by Big E 757
(Post 2932103)
I estimated that half of the 40....20 that were widebody A’s. That would be 240. Someone said 170 widebody A’s were retiring this year so my estimate was still off a ways.
|
Originally Posted by MJP27
(Post 2932225)
I still agree with your premise. I haven’t seen the “widebody growth” reflected in these latest AEs. I’m hoping the next few change my mind....
|
The NEO delays are actually a good thing in keeping them from posting a 12 month bid. They can’t really plan around them as they are so fluid.
|
Originally Posted by MJP27
(Post 2932225)
I still agree with your premise. I haven’t seen the “widebody growth” reflected in these latest AEs. I’m hoping the next few change my mind....
|
Originally Posted by sailingfun
(Post 2932247)
The company has awarded well over 400 CA positions this calendar year on 767-400 or larger equipment. That includes bypasses. Add in the 7ER and that number almost doubles.
How about without bypasses? Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Originally Posted by tunes
(Post 2932307)
How about without bypasses?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Weren't there 65 bypasses on just this last bid?
|
Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
(Post 2932311)
Weren't there 65 bypasses on just this last bid?
|
Originally Posted by sailingfun
(Post 2932247)
The company has awarded well over 400 CA positions this calendar year on 767-400 or larger equipment. That includes bypasses. Add in the 7ER and that number almost doubles.
According to Curly's site, there have been 519 new A's across all equipment in the same time frame, the vast majority of which have been NB. I went and counted the WB A's this Calendar Year.: 36 From Jan, 239 From March, and 27 From Nov, for a total of 302. However, a good portion of those were already WB A's, just moving base or equipment... |
Originally Posted by FangsF15
(Post 2932389)
Bypasses are completely irrelevant for this discussion. There have been 109 of those since March, so take 25% off the top at least.
According to Curly's site, there have been 519 new A's across all equipment in the same time frame, the vast majority of which have been NB. I went and counted the WB A's this Calendar Year.: 36 From Jan, 239 From March, and 27 From Nov, for a total of 302. However, a good portion of those were already WB A's, just moving base or equipment... |
Originally Posted by Big E 757
(Post 2932396)
I have a feeling he included backfills. Which doesn’t account for retirements or new positions.
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:37 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands