Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Delta Mgmt requests mediator. >

Delta Mgmt requests mediator.

Search

Notices

Delta Mgmt requests mediator.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-09-2020 | 10:56 AM
  #71  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Nov 2018
Posts: 92
Likes: 7
Default

Originally Posted by tom14cat14
Why does everyone say our offer is so bad? Because we dont like 1 part of it? We are making Billions, returning billions to the shareholders via buybacks and dividends. Why would we not ask to fix our contract?

I think too many people have forgotten how negotiating a non-concessionary contract goes. Our "give" was we will continue to keep working for the company and not strike.
Could this also be a warning shot to the FAs. "Look what will happen if you want to be represented?"
Reply
Old 01-09-2020 | 11:05 AM
  #72  
newKnow's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 6,844
Likes: 0
From: 765-A
Default

Originally Posted by RonRicco
Denny,

Maybe the company hasn’t. But what if we haven’t either? Maybe mediation is needed.

I have seen up close and personal an MEC that creates a constantly changing target and one that also reneges on previous direction. We saw some of that during TA2 and SWA’s previous negotiations and it did not go well with the NMB.

I don’t know who is negotiating in good faith and who isn’t. We may show up for every meeting, but are we really negotiating?

We will see based in how much time the NMB gives us. Once a month or less and then I will know who is at fault sans any more data being provided.
When the company terminated your pension plan, were they “really negotiating?” Or, did you just wake up one day and find out you had lost $100,000 for every year that you lived past the age of 60?

Or, how about in C2012 when the company included an offer to buy SWA/AirTrans 717’s, when we knew they wanted them whether we ratified the agreement, or not. Was that really negotiating?

Same thing for the early retirement plan offer and drawdown of the 50 seat RJ’s. Things that they already wanted were included as “improvements” to our contract. Was that really negotiating?

Finally, how about in 2015 when they tried to offer us pay raises that were to be paid with the money we would have given up with the loss of our profit sharing?

So now, in 2020, when the company is making so much money that they can buy ownership of airlines, buy stock back, and give pay raises to other employee groups, while doing nothing to fix the debacle that occurred last summer, (other than to reduce the amount of summer vacation weeks for us), if our union isn’t “really negotiating” when it comes to restoration of our (as in everyone’s) retirements, vacations,
schedule flexibility, and other contract improvements, I’m fine with it.

Taking a hard line like that is long overdue.
Reply
Old 01-09-2020 | 11:20 AM
  #73  
Denny Crane's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 6,971
Likes: 0
From: Kickin’ Back
Default

Originally Posted by newKnow
When the company terminated your pension plan, were they “really negotiating?” Or, did you just wake up one day and find out you had lost $100,000 for every year that you lived past the age of 60?

Or, how about in C2012 when the company included an offer to buy SWA/AirTrans 717’s, when we knew they wanted them whether we ratified the agreement, or not. Was that really negotiating?

Same thing for the early retirement plan offer and drawdown of the 50 seat RJ’s. Things that they already wanted were included as “improvements” to our contract. Was that really negotiating?

Finally, how about in 2015 when they tried to offer us pay raises that were to be paid with the money we would have given up with the loss of our profit sharing?

So now, in 2020, when the company is making so much money that they can buy ownership of airlines, buy stock back, and give pay raises to other employee groups, while doing nothing to fix the debacle that occurred last summer, (other than to reduce the amount of summer vacation weeks for us), if our union isn’t “really negotiating” when it comes to restoration of our (as in everyone’s) retirements, vacations,
schedule flexibility, and other contract improvements, I’m fine with it.

Taking a hard line like that is long overdue.
My newKnow speaks for me!!!

Denny
Reply
Old 01-09-2020 | 11:21 AM
  #74  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,681
Likes: 62
Default

Preach it my brother!





Originally Posted by newKnow
When the company terminated your pension plan, were they “really negotiating?” Or, did you just wake up one day and find out you had lost $100,000 for every year that you lived past the age of 60?

Or, how about in C2012 when the company included an offer to buy SWA/AirTrans 717’s, when we knew they wanted them whether we ratified the agreement, or not. Was that really negotiating?

Same thing for the early retirement plan offer and drawdown of the 50 seat RJ’s. Things that they already wanted were included as “improvements” to our contract. Was that really negotiating?

Finally, how about in 2015 when they tried to offer us pay raises that were to be paid with the money we would have given up with the loss of our profit sharing?

So now, in 2020, when the company is making so much money that they can buy ownership of airlines, buy stock back, and give pay raises to other employee groups, while doing nothing to fix the debacle that occurred last summer, (other than to reduce the amount of summer vacation weeks for us), if our union isn’t “really negotiating” when it comes to restoration of our (as in everyone’s) retirements, vacations,
schedule flexibility, and other contract improvements, I’m fine with it.

Taking a hard line like that is long overdue.
Reply
Old 01-09-2020 | 11:22 AM
  #75  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 654
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Trip7
Just read the NN as well. Quite pleased with some to the TA'd sections gains:

SC paid over guarantee
GS pay protection for Reserves
Commuter paid parking
Automated Sick/Well call system.

Pretty big QOL gains there

Sent from my SM-G975U1 using Tapatalk
Please stop. I think we all know that you are going to be pleased with management almost no matter what, but replying to my comment about the dumpster fire it appears that the company's Section 23 proposal was with a chipper post about the little things you're happy with implies that you think these offset management's intent to gut our working rules to get out from under our Gummed up staffing.

Maybe that wasn't your intent, but you need to know that that's how it reads, particularly when placed in context of many of your other posts on a variety of topics.

These things you mentioned represent a tiny fraction of the PWA, and would be considered a cherry on top of an improved Section 23.
Reply
Old 01-09-2020 | 11:22 AM
  #76  
RonRicco's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 833
Likes: 5
From: Captain
Default

Originally Posted by newKnow
When the company terminated your pension plan, were they “really negotiating?” Or, did you just wake up one day and find out you had lost $100,000 for every year that you lived past the age of 60?

Or, how about in C2012 when the company included an offer to buy SWA/AirTrans 717’s, when we knew they wanted them whether we ratified the agreement, or not. Was that really negotiating?

Same thing for the early retirement plan offer and drawdown of the 50 seat RJ’s. Things that they already wanted were included as “improvements” to our contract. Was that really negotiating?

Finally, how about in 2015 when they tried to offer us pay raises that were to be paid with the money we would have given up with the loss of our profit sharing?

So now, in 2020, when the company is making so much money that they can buy ownership of airlines, buy stock back, and give pay raises to other employee groups, while doing nothing to fix the debacle that occurred last summer, (other than to reduce the amount of summer vacation weeks for us), if our union isn’t “really negotiating” when it comes to restoration of our (as in everyone’s) retirements, vacations,
schedule flexibility, and other contract improvements, I’m fine with it.

Taking a hard line like that is long overdue.

Obviously you didn’t get the point if the post. Either way, it isn’t me you have to try and convince.
Reply
Old 01-09-2020 | 11:53 AM
  #77  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 513
Likes: 20
From: NYC 330
Default

Originally Posted by Trip7
Word on the street is the Union's opener is a $4 Billion or 100% PWA cost increase. I think we know what the NMB's response will be as does the Company

Sent from my SM-G975U1 using Tapatalk
"Word on the street"?

$2 Billion is what it is now?

needs to be confirmed..
Reply
Old 01-09-2020 | 12:03 PM
  #78  
Trip7's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 6,144
Likes: 204
Default

Capt Graham has emailed a rebuttal to the pilot group. Said Ryan's letter contained several inaccuracies, including the $28 million quote

Sent from my SM-G975U1 using Tapatalk
Reply
Old 01-09-2020 | 12:04 PM
  #79  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,465
Likes: 0
From: A330 First Officer
Default

So JM just put out a memo countering what the union memo's said. So did they or did they not cancel future meetings? That should be an easy one to prove. How about this, how about both sides put out their opening positions in general terms (kinda like the union actually did) and see who is talking with forked tongue.
Reply
Old 01-09-2020 | 12:06 PM
  #80  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Nov 2018
Posts: 332
Likes: 17
Default

Originally Posted by dbrownie
"Word on the street"?
Speaking of the "word on the street". Word is... ever since the company announced their three negotiators it was obvious that they had NO INTENTION of quickly coming to an agreement with the pilot group. The word on the street is that the three company negotiators HAVE ZERO experience negotiating. Therefore, they have to run everything by others to get analysis and approval (time consuming). Just what I've heard on the street.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Ferd149
Mergers and Acquisitions
117
11-08-2023 07:41 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
molson247
Regional
123
07-07-2008 12:25 PM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM
RockBottom
Major
0
09-15-2006 09:50 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices