MEC Chair and NC Lounge Visits
#41
Line Holder
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 636
Likes: 13
From: Stretch DC-9 Gear Slinger
that is a bad example though because the company basically just got everything they wanted. So it can really only be done if we give in like in 2015.
#42
I get broken trips from out of base all the time with "for RES coverage only". These trips never see the trip coverage ladder, they just parcel up an undesirable turd in an understaffed base, throw on some DHs, and custom tailor for the guy sitting reserve. I can't find where in the contract that practice is legal but they do it so often there has to be a stipulation somewhere.
#43
Moderator
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 7,253
Likes: 96
From: DAL 330
Ahhh, I was referencing only his "new guy retirement" comment, nothing more. You expand the discussion about the old guys and the BK era issues/benefits, yet forget about the details. Note/claim money was nice, but most of us paid "ORDINARY INCOME TAX" ON MOST OF IT. 5 extra years at the top of the seniority list is offset by 5 years of F/O pay as a Captain. (I made about $150 an hour as a 20 year MD-88 captain). And the stock has not really increased much since the issue date.
On the other hand, 16-25% DC contributions for 25-35 years will dwarf what the old guys got for retirement monies. And don't count these other non retirement monies you list above, as they would be offset by todays payrates and rapid advancement (maybe thousands of 2 and 3 year Captains)
On the other hand, 16-25% DC contributions for 25-35 years will dwarf what the old guys got for retirement monies. And don't count these other non retirement monies you list above, as they would be offset by todays payrates and rapid advancement (maybe thousands of 2 and 3 year Captains)
You make many valid points - 5 years of FO pay as a Captain ain’t one of them. As an FO at the time my pay went down to $85/hr.
Using your comparison what did the FOs get?
Scoop
#44
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,465
Likes: 0
From: A330 First Officer
#45
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 20,872
Likes: 189
I get broken trips from out of base all the time with "for RES coverage only". These trips never see the trip coverage ladder, they just parcel up an undesirable turd in an understaffed base, throw on some DHs, and custom tailor for the guy sitting reserve. I can't find where in the contract that practice is legal but they do it so often there has to be a stipulation somewhere.
This is vastly different from combining different trips into one trip for reserve assignment.
i highly doubt your statement they never see the trip coverage ladder. You for sure know that would not be legal and would have contacted ALPA about the trips.
#46
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 2,553
Likes: 100
From: Road construction signholder
I get broken trips from out of base all the time with "for RES coverage only". These trips never see the trip coverage ladder, they just parcel up an undesirable turd in an understaffed base, throw on some DHs, and custom tailor for the guy sitting reserve. I can't find where in the contract that practice is legal but they do it so often there has to be a stipulation somewhere.
Reserve-Only Trips
The following remark is sometimes added at the bottom of a rotation: “rotation must go to a reserve,” or “reserve only.” This type of remark indicates that the rotation was moved from another domicile that did not have adequate reserves to cover the rotation to a domicile that does have adequate reserves to fly the rotation.
For example, suppose there is a trip in open time in the SLC base that is being covered by Crew Scheduling more than 12 hours prior to report. As the scheduler goes through the trip coverage process, he follows the trip coverage steps in Section 23 N. If he reaches step seven (no available pilots in steps one through six), he looks for an available reserve pilot in the same position at another base. If he finds an available reserve pilot in another base, he adds/removes deadhead legs on each end of the trip as needed and awards it to that pilot as an out-of-base reserve. He also adds the remark “reserve only” to the bottom of the rotation.
The trip coverage process causes these rotations to be temporarily added to the list of open time for the base which has the available reserve, with the comment that it must go to a reserve pilot. A regular linehold- er in that base may see the trip and wonder why he may not be awarded the flying on a white slip. Regular lineholders in that base had their shot at this trip via step six—“out-of-base regular pilots who have submitted white slips (in seniority order).” Although it may be a good-looking trip, it is actually a SLC trip that is being assigned at step seven and it must go to a reserve pilot.
My only heartburn with the whole issue (which has been a contractual provision my entire 23 years here) is this statement from the SRH.: "Regular lineholders in that base had their shot at this trip via step six—“out-of-base regular pilots who have submitted white slips (in seniority order).”
I have contended before (and still do) that there is a HUGE difference between a trip that has to originate in a base (requiring out of base pilots to commute in and out on their own, JS etc) vs a trip that has DHs on either end--the first is more hassle than it is worth for most guys considering an OOBWS vs the second, which is the very dream of an out of base guy! Hard to say "out of base guys had their shot" when you are really comparing two different things.
#47
I've never had that happen - if it's not a trip from my base, the trip is built with a DH to join the rotation somewhere, fly the rotation. Then, when I reach the base it was started in, I either DH back to my base or layover and DH home the next day. Usually at the bottom of the rotation they'll say a note like, "NEED TO CVR Off SLC 01FEB/1222" which is the original SLC (in this case) rotation.
#48
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 20,872
Likes: 189
This has been addressed by ALPA more than once. Check out page 71 of the Scheduling Reference Handbook...you know, that very helpful guide that your Scheduling Committee has worked very hard on...and it is in your Aerodocs app on the company issued iPad. You'd be amazed at some of the stuff out there that guys "just can't find."
Reserve-Only Trips
The following remark is sometimes added at the bottom of a rotation: “rotation must go to a reserve,” or “reserve only.” This type of remark indicates that the rotation was moved from another domicile that did not have adequate reserves to cover the rotation to a domicile that does have adequate reserves to fly the rotation.
For example, suppose there is a trip in open time in the SLC base that is being covered by Crew Scheduling more than 12 hours prior to report. As the scheduler goes through the trip coverage process, he follows the trip coverage steps in Section 23 N. If he reaches step seven (no available pilots in steps one through six), he looks for an available reserve pilot in the same position at another base. If he finds an available reserve pilot in another base, he adds/removes deadhead legs on each end of the trip as needed and awards it to that pilot as an out-of-base reserve. He also adds the remark “reserve only” to the bottom of the rotation.
The trip coverage process causes these rotations to be temporarily added to the list of open time for the base which has the available reserve, with the comment that it must go to a reserve pilot. A regular linehold- er in that base may see the trip and wonder why he may not be awarded the flying on a white slip. Regular lineholders in that base had their shot at this trip via step six—“out-of-base regular pilots who have submitted white slips (in seniority order).” Although it may be a good-looking trip, it is actually a SLC trip that is being assigned at step seven and it must go to a reserve pilot.
My only heartburn with the whole issue (which has been a contractual provision my entire 23 years here) is this statement from the SRH.: "Regular lineholders in that base had their shot at this trip via step six—“out-of-base regular pilots who have submitted white slips (in seniority order).”
I have contended before (and still do) that there is a HUGE difference between a trip that has to originate in a base (requiring out of base pilots to commute in and out on their own, JS etc) vs a trip that has DHs on either end--the first is more hassle than it is worth for most guys considering an OOBWS vs the second, which is the very dream of an out of base guy! Hard to say "out of base guys had their shot" when you are really comparing two different things.
Reserve-Only Trips
The following remark is sometimes added at the bottom of a rotation: “rotation must go to a reserve,” or “reserve only.” This type of remark indicates that the rotation was moved from another domicile that did not have adequate reserves to cover the rotation to a domicile that does have adequate reserves to fly the rotation.
For example, suppose there is a trip in open time in the SLC base that is being covered by Crew Scheduling more than 12 hours prior to report. As the scheduler goes through the trip coverage process, he follows the trip coverage steps in Section 23 N. If he reaches step seven (no available pilots in steps one through six), he looks for an available reserve pilot in the same position at another base. If he finds an available reserve pilot in another base, he adds/removes deadhead legs on each end of the trip as needed and awards it to that pilot as an out-of-base reserve. He also adds the remark “reserve only” to the bottom of the rotation.
The trip coverage process causes these rotations to be temporarily added to the list of open time for the base which has the available reserve, with the comment that it must go to a reserve pilot. A regular linehold- er in that base may see the trip and wonder why he may not be awarded the flying on a white slip. Regular lineholders in that base had their shot at this trip via step six—“out-of-base regular pilots who have submitted white slips (in seniority order).” Although it may be a good-looking trip, it is actually a SLC trip that is being assigned at step seven and it must go to a reserve pilot.
My only heartburn with the whole issue (which has been a contractual provision my entire 23 years here) is this statement from the SRH.: "Regular lineholders in that base had their shot at this trip via step six—“out-of-base regular pilots who have submitted white slips (in seniority order).”
I have contended before (and still do) that there is a HUGE difference between a trip that has to originate in a base (requiring out of base pilots to commute in and out on their own, JS etc) vs a trip that has DHs on either end--the first is more hassle than it is worth for most guys considering an OOBWS vs the second, which is the very dream of an out of base guy! Hard to say "out of base guys had their shot" when you are really comparing two different things.
#49
Lots of assumptions there. Like we will always get a DC. Like we will never see paycuts or furloughs. Like constant quick upgrades. Like the government won’t be gunning for the 401ks. Sure, if everything remains as it is today after 20 years we SHOULD have a nice retirement. What are you willing to give in this contract to ensure I have funded retirement? Because that’s what is being asked of everyone hired after 2010.
As for what I am willing to give in this contract.......How about 25% DC for 25+ years, offset my the "plus up" money for the retirees. Not to mention all the other parts of the contract we improve that impact pay and retirement
#50
Simple. He puts "5 years extra time at the top of the payscale" yet F/Os benefit directly from those payrates as well. And they'll get those magical extra 5 years as well. Gotta do it both ways.


