View Poll Results: Do you plan to take the VEOP offer?
I'm age 60+, Definitely Yes
6
2.83%
I'm age 60+, Leaning Yes
13
6.13%
I'm age 60+, Leaning No
3
1.42%
I'm age 60+, Definitely No
5
2.36%
I'm age <60, Definitely Yes
5
2.36%
I'm age <60, Leaning Yes
6
2.83%
I'm age <60, Leaning No
6
2.83%
I'm age <60, Definitely No
23
10.85%
Not eligible, but would take it if I were
121
57.08%
Not eligible and would not take it
24
11.32%
Voters: 212. You may not vote on this poll
Better VEOP Poll
#31
Banned
Joined APC: Jun 2018
Posts: 1,838
I don't have a dog in the fight however, whats with the guys/gals not even eligible saying “I would take it if I was in their shoes” or “I bet those not willing to take it are already on my no fly list”. News flash young group. You have no clue the amount of set back the group thats over 62 have taken in their retirements the past 15 years. You have no clue if you would take it unless you are 62+ and have the ability to look at what you have in retirement accounts. I find it pathetic that you would have some on the furlough line degrading anyone not willing to take this huge pay cut called “an early retirement”.
#32
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2018
Posts: 3,237
I don't have a dog in the fight however, whats with the guys/gals not even eligible saying “I would take it if I was in their shoes” or “I bet those not willing to take it are already on my no fly list”. News flash young group. You have no clue the amount of set back the group thats over 62 have taken in their retirements the past 15 years. You have no clue if you would take it unless you are 62+ and have the ability to look at what you have in retirement accounts. I find it pathetic that you would have some on the furlough line degrading anyone not willing to take this huge pay cut called “an early retirement”.
And if you stay, and don't do your, like, civic duty and, like, leave......I am gonna put you on, like, my "Do not fly list". I'll show you.
#34
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2018
Posts: 3,237
It also begs the question, are they just "Rebels without a cause" or so enlightened with critical thinking that old guys can't keep up or are they just plain naive and lack perspective?
I will add, that the number of posters is prolly only 1/10 of the lurkers. If the vocal minority thinks they speak for the vast majority IMO that would be fallacious
#35
I’m in the not eligible but I’m in the polls “would take” numbers. I voted because it’s an anonymous internet poll and that’s the category I thought applied to me. There’s no slight on my part and I think this is a good way to separate the wheat from the chaff. I hope a lot of people take it. That is self serving but I also think they deserve it. The opportunity I mean. Many planned for age 60 this gives income that may make that a reality or closer to a reality. If it doesn’t work for you, you are under no obligation to do it.
I’d be sharpening a few pencils and spending some money for a financial planner to go over it in detail and then make a decision. For me at 58 it would work (not there yet) so I can only hope for something like this when I’m ready. Unfortunately an early out is only offered to reduce staffing costs and that means the company isn’t in the best financial health. I doubt I will have the opportunity and hoping for it seems like wishing ill on my employer. This is not restoring a retirement but it’s something. It’s not my place to have an opinion on individuals willingness to opt for this, but recognize it as an opportunity.
I’d be sharpening a few pencils and spending some money for a financial planner to go over it in detail and then make a decision. For me at 58 it would work (not there yet) so I can only hope for something like this when I’m ready. Unfortunately an early out is only offered to reduce staffing costs and that means the company isn’t in the best financial health. I doubt I will have the opportunity and hoping for it seems like wishing ill on my employer. This is not restoring a retirement but it’s something. It’s not my place to have an opinion on individuals willingness to opt for this, but recognize it as an opportunity.
#36
I don't have a dog in the fight however, whats with the guys/gals not even eligible saying “I would take it if I was in their shoes” or “I bet those not willing to take it are already on my no fly list”. News flash young group. You have no clue the amount of set back the group thats over 62 have taken in their retirements the past 15 years. You have no clue if you would take it unless you are 62+ and have the ability to look at what you have in retirement accounts. I find it pathetic that you would have some on the furlough line degrading anyone not willing to take this huge pay cut called “an early retirement”.
What’s wrong with giving the opinion of “I’d take it if I was X years old”?
As a guy anticipating my WARN notification this week, it doesn’t matter one bit to me if an old hat wants to take the EO or not. I’m a QOL person, so if I was 60+, I think I would take it simply because I value time at home to do things I enjoy other than flying. But that’s me. I’m not 60+ and I’m not in anyone else’s situation other than my own.
Standing on the grass yelling for me to get off your lawn via a lecture with condescending words such as “news flash” isn’t going to help me understand why those eligible would or wouldn’t. It’s their choice to make either way, but you undercut the rationale to young guys by simply saying “you don’t understand” and saying all young guys are “pathetic”. Instead, explain it in an unemotional way so that young guys can understand. Painting us all with a wide brush because one guy on an anonymous forum said he didn’t want to fly with someone is a bit extreme.
#37
I know taking the EO will reduce my income, but I also need to calculate my effective hourly rate for flying those hours above 58 and weigh that.
#38
Bracing for Fallacies
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: In favor of good things, not in favor of bad things
Posts: 3,543
What’s wrong with giving the opinion of “I’d take it if I was X years old”?
As a guy anticipating my WARN notification this week, it doesn’t matter one bit to me if an old hat wants to take the EO or not. I’m a QOL person, so if I was 60+, I think I would take it simply because I value time at home to do things I enjoy other than flying. But that’s me. I’m not 60+ and I’m not in anyone else’s situation other than my own.
Standing on the grass yelling for me to get off your lawn via a lecture with condescending words such as “news flash” isn’t going to help me understand why those eligible would or wouldn’t. It’s their choice to make either way, but you undercut the rationale to young guys by simply saying “you don’t understand” and saying all young guys are “pathetic”. Instead, explain it in an unemotional way so that young guys can understand. Painting us all with a wide brush because one guy on an anonymous forum said he didn’t want to fly with someone is a bit extreme.
As a guy anticipating my WARN notification this week, it doesn’t matter one bit to me if an old hat wants to take the EO or not. I’m a QOL person, so if I was 60+, I think I would take it simply because I value time at home to do things I enjoy other than flying. But that’s me. I’m not 60+ and I’m not in anyone else’s situation other than my own.
Standing on the grass yelling for me to get off your lawn via a lecture with condescending words such as “news flash” isn’t going to help me understand why those eligible would or wouldn’t. It’s their choice to make either way, but you undercut the rationale to young guys by simply saying “you don’t understand” and saying all young guys are “pathetic”. Instead, explain it in an unemotional way so that young guys can understand. Painting us all with a wide brush because one guy on an anonymous forum said he didn’t want to fly with someone is a bit extreme.
Its the folks who got their first flying job 2016 and later that have had a meteoric rise. I'm not picking fights with them, it is what it is. Certainly now they are facing the first real headwinds....and shoot, at least for now, it looks like Endeavor is not going to furlough. (I dont know about the other regionals.)
#39
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2018
Posts: 3,237
What’s wrong with giving the opinion of “I’d take it if I was X years old”?
As a guy anticipating my WARN notification this week, it doesn’t matter one bit to me if an old hat wants to take the EO or not. I’m a QOL person, so if I was 60+, I think I would take it simply because I value time at home to do things I enjoy other than flying. But that’s me. I’m not 60+ and I’m not in anyone else’s situation other than my own.
Standing on the grass yelling for me to get off your lawn via a lecture with condescending words such as “news flash” isn’t going to help me understand why those eligible would or wouldn’t. It’s their choice to make either way, but you undercut the rationale to young guys by simply saying “you don’t understand” and saying all young guys are “pathetic”. Instead, explain it in an unemotional way so that young guys can understand. Painting us all with a wide brush because one guy on an anonymous forum said he didn’t want to fly with someone is a bit extreme.
As a guy anticipating my WARN notification this week, it doesn’t matter one bit to me if an old hat wants to take the EO or not. I’m a QOL person, so if I was 60+, I think I would take it simply because I value time at home to do things I enjoy other than flying. But that’s me. I’m not 60+ and I’m not in anyone else’s situation other than my own.
Standing on the grass yelling for me to get off your lawn via a lecture with condescending words such as “news flash” isn’t going to help me understand why those eligible would or wouldn’t. It’s their choice to make either way, but you undercut the rationale to young guys by simply saying “you don’t understand” and saying all young guys are “pathetic”. Instead, explain it in an unemotional way so that young guys can understand. Painting us all with a wide brush because one guy on an anonymous forum said he didn’t want to fly with someone is a bit extreme.
I can work an average of 16 days a month and make $16,000 per month more than taking the ER package. So, the choice is work at a job that is enjoyable for $1,000 day average and delay PBGC for 2 years increasing my PBGC payout by $18,000 per year for every year that I collect. Or retire early and forego that to have more time off. Money and time off are analagous in trying to quantify how much is enough.
Guys that are in furlough jeopardy talk about being a truck driver( maybe $300-$400 a day and not near as enjoyable) or going back into the military full time for maybe about $500 day. Or sim instructor $400 day. So, $$$ wise staying at Delta pays way more than that.
I think younger guys are pretty flippant in their response as to taking the ER if only they were eligible.
#40
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2008
Posts: 329
Seriously. I will sign up for the EO, but at the moment I'm leaning towards revoking it depending on my separation date and how confident I am of Delta avoiding bankruptcy.
I know taking the EO will reduce my income, but I also need to calculate my effective hourly rate for flying those hours above 58 and weigh that.
I know taking the EO will reduce my income, but I also need to calculate my effective hourly rate for flying those hours above 58 and weigh that.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post