![]() |
Originally Posted by sailingfun
(Post 3131237)
The company can simply furlough and get a greater cost savings.
I didn't say they could potentially avoid all involuntary furloughs, they did. I didn't say they'd exhaust voluntary options, they did. I didn't say they would be creative, they did. I've said I'll work less, not for less. There are plenty of pilots willing to help management avoid furloughs, but it's not a blank check for them to cash in on this crisis to achieve their contractual gains for the next decade or two. We all lost a week of vacation 15 years ago. Did that ever come back during years of $Billions in profits? Nope. It was a gateway item for management... wouldn't even entertain the thought. |
Originally Posted by sailingfun
(Post 3131219)
Even if they kept the same number of days on call the amount of actually flying a reserve could contractually be used would be reduced by the ALV reduction. With the planned staffing levels reserve utilization is not going to be high and given pilot posts here and in reality, line holders will be picking up a lot of open time further reducing reserve utilization.
I have seen nothing however that indicates we could not negotiate a reduction in on call days with a ALV reduction. As this evolves what your going to start hearing more and more often is this. “Damn, I wasn’t senior enough to hold reserve next month” |
Originally Posted by wags3539
(Post 3131221)
Unfortunately, this sums it up perfectly. I wasn't around for the past, but I'm familiar with it. I was however here to see the SIL's promised and subsequently yanked away so I fully understand the distrust. This is not a problem of pilot's unwilling to negotiate. This is a problem that management created a long time ago. They planted the seed of distrust, and now it's grown into a massive tree that they're trying to pretend doesn't exist. It's very difficult to come back from that...That whole 'fool me once thing.'
|
Originally Posted by sailingfun
(Post 3131233)
I am not sure why people keep saying they want to slash widebody ALV’s. With the elimination of the 777 category and the VEOP retirements they are short and have a lot of training to do for both the A350 and A330 on the Captains side. The A350 next summer will fully utilize every airframe. The 330 is projected for high utilization. ALV’s will be high for both. The manning on the widebodies is solved, the only problem is getting more widebody pilots trained.
|
Originally Posted by TED74
(Post 3131253)
Honestly, I'd actually respect that business decision... in absence of the public proclamations they've made about wanting to avoid them. They can't have it both ways, making commitments to avoid furloughs while choosing to furlough because it helps near-term cash flow.
|
Originally Posted by sailingfun
(Post 3131233)
I am not sure why people keep saying they want to slash widebody ALV’s. With the elimination of the 777 category and the VEOP retirements they are short and have a lot of training to do for both the A350 and A330 on the Captains side. The A350 next summer will fully utilize every airframe. The 330 is projected for high utilization. ALV’s will be high for both. The manning on the widebodies is solved, the only problem is getting more widebody pilots trained.
Denny |
Originally Posted by Denny Crane
(Post 3131265)
‘Well SEA330A certainly isn’t undermanned for September/October...... One three day trip leaving 30 Sept in open time thru end of October as of last night. I suspect it’s that way in all 330A categories. When is the 330A supposed to be short? Didn’t I read somewhere we still have half our 330’s parked and there are three -900 for us sitting on the ramp at Airbus?
Denny P.S. Take a look at NYC and ATL open time. Traditionally there is little to no 330 open time in the fall. |
Originally Posted by sailingfun
(Post 3131233)
I am not sure why people keep saying they want to slash widebody ALV’s. With the elimination of the 777 category and the VEOP retirements they are short and have a lot of training to do for both the A350 and A330 on the Captains side. The A350 next summer will fully utilize every airframe. The 330 is projected for high utilization. ALV’s will be high for both. The manning on the widebodies is solved, the only problem is getting more widebody pilots trained.
|
Originally Posted by RogSmitty
(Post 3131270)
Then why oh why did they not come close to filling the vacancies they posted for those jets on the last AE? And don’t say training limitations because most would have been filled with reinstatement’s.
|
Originally Posted by notEnuf
(Post 3131258)
If ALVs will be high, why are they negotiating for a reduction??? :confused:
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:32 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands