Search
Notices

COVID moved Posts 1

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-22-2021, 01:33 PM
  #61  
Gets Weekends Off
 
GucciBoy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2009
Position: Fetal
Posts: 1,148
Default

Originally Posted by Phins2right View Post
It is not.

No you do not.

You are drawing the wrong conclusions their top knot.

Stop trying to distract from the point.

Now tell me about the Lancet retraction. I'm all ears. How you going to subterfuge that one?

So you post a research article for the sole purpose of supporting your claim that HCQ is the key to COVID treatment, but deny the claim that mask wear is essential, which comes from the same article. Do I have that right?

I’m still waiting for you to address the Biden Resolute Desk claim you made in December. After you address that you can address the above. After you address those, I’ll answer whatever question you have for me about the “Lancet retraction.”

Second request: Please have your wife proofread your rants. Thanks in advance.
GucciBoy is offline  
Old 01-22-2021, 01:44 PM
  #62  
Banned
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Feb 2020
Position: Gummed
Posts: 1,060
Default

Originally Posted by GucciBoy View Post
So you post a research article for the sole purpose of supporting your claim that HCQ is the key to COVID treatment, but deny the claim that mask wear is essential, which comes from the same article. Do I have that right?

I’m still waiting for you to address the Biden Resolute Desk claim you made in December. After you address that you can address the above. After you address those, I’ll answer whatever question you have for me about the “Lancet retraction.”

Second request: Please have your wife proofread your rants. Thanks in advance.
Keep waiting. You have no power here.

No. you don't

HCQ is an effective treatment. I said that back in June. Lancet was cited on this board as denying it as well.

Well now, AJM says it is an effective, viable TREATMENT for the china flu. Lancet just retracted their summer article denouncing HCQ as being an effective TREATMENT. Masks do not enter the TREATMENT realm there doctor McCoy.

How much more obvious do I need to be with you there top knot? The facts don't lie. HCQ proven to work. Previous were lies politically motivated.

Practicing doctors, like my wife, use it effectively despite what a bureaucrat tells them. Go find a FFF Fauxhi patient and ask them.....oh wait.

My wife has better things to do than humor your idiotic requests.

You should loosen that top knot, it is cutting off the oxygen to your brain (or maybe its the triple masks you wear??) - whatever - you need to lighten up and enjoy life.

Fly safe. Have a great weekend.
Phins2right is offline  
Old 01-22-2021, 03:46 PM
  #63  
Gets Weekends Off
 
GucciBoy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2009
Position: Fetal
Posts: 1,148
Default COVID moved Posts 1

Originally Posted by Phins2right View Post
Keep waiting. You have no power here.

No. you don't

HCQ is an effective treatment. I said that back in June. Lancet was cited on this board as denying it as well.

Well now, AJM says it is an effective, viable TREATMENT for the china flu. Lancet just retracted their summer article denouncing HCQ as being an effective TREATMENT. Masks do not enter the TREATMENT realm there doctor McCoy.

How much more obvious do I need to be with you there top knot? The facts don't lie. HCQ proven to work. Previous were lies politically motivated.

Practicing doctors, like my wife, use it effectively despite what a bureaucrat tells them. Go find a FFF Fauxhi patient and ask them.....oh wait.

My wife has better things to do than humor your idiotic requests.

You should loosen that top knot, it is cutting off the oxygen to your brain (or maybe its the triple masks you wear??) - whatever - you need to lighten up and enjoy life.

Fly safe. Have a great weekend.
Me: “Tell me why you said Biden would never hold the office of president a month after his election.”

You: “HQC is an effective treatment for COVID! Read this article!”

Me: “That article says mask wear is essential to containing infection.”

You: “Why won’t you talk about the Lancet retraction??! You have a man bun!”
GucciBoy is offline  
Old 01-22-2021, 04:37 PM
  #64  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Posts: 8,898
Default

Originally Posted by Phins2right View Post
You, like the ilk at the daily mail need to learn how to read.

Right. 3+ million dead. Caused by a cold bug? Don't think so. Good grief. You have a degree?

Where did ANYONE say 3.2 million dead were from the virus?

Good grief to you. Covid deniers/hoaxers like you have a problem with simple numbers and reading comprehension.

The DM article quoted CDC, and since DM wasn't good for you, I posted the actual CDC total death count.

I'll say it slow so even you can understand:

2.8 million dead in 2018 OVERALL

2.83 million dead in 2019 OVERALL

Those are the "normal" TOTAL death numbers in two years. Annually, we lose about 2.8 to 2.9 million people from ALL causes. This is total deaths.

But 2020 is 3.2 million total deaths. The average of 2.8 to 2.9 million deaths total was exceeded. Something set that off, and the additional ~350k deaths are from Covid 19. And then you had all the other deaths that you'd normally have in America every year, 2.8-2.9 million.

The whole point of this exercise is to DISPROVE Covid deniers like you who keep insisting Covid hasn't killed more than the normal expected deaths of Americans in a year, and that Covid deaths are counted as people dying with covid as opposed to from covid.

Fine, IF that was true, then overall you should still have seen 2.8 to 2.9 million dead Americans total for 2020.

That clearly was not the case. Total deaths for 2020 from all causes was 3.2 million.

Clear as mud?
ShyGuy is offline  
Old 01-22-2021, 08:12 PM
  #65  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2020
Posts: 454
Default

Originally Posted by ShyGuy View Post
Where did ANYONE say 3.2 million dead were from the virus?

Good grief to you. Covid deniers/hoaxers like you have a problem with simple numbers and reading comprehension.

The DM article quoted CDC, and since DM wasn't good for you, I posted the actual CDC total death count.

I'll say it slow so even you can understand:

2.8 million dead in 2018 OVERALL

2.83 million dead in 2019 OVERALL

Those are the "normal" TOTAL death numbers in two years. Annually, we lose about 2.8 to 2.9 million people from ALL causes. This is total deaths.

But 2020 is 3.2 million total deaths. The average of 2.8 to 2.9 million deaths total was exceeded. Something set that off, and the additional ~350k deaths are from Covid 19. And then you had all the other deaths that you'd normally have in America every year, 2.8-2.9 million.

The whole point of this exercise is to DISPROVE Covid deniers like you who keep insisting Covid hasn't killed more than the normal expected deaths of Americans in a year, and that Covid deaths are counted as people dying with covid as opposed to from covid.

Fine, IF that was true, then overall you should still have seen 2.8 to 2.9 million dead Americans total for 2020.

That clearly was not the case. Total deaths for 2020 from all causes was 3.2 million.

Clear as mud?
I’ve come to realize you are literally in a yelling match with that crazy bum from the corner store. He cant even understand numbers my man, he cray cray
Nvrgofullretard is offline  
Old 01-25-2021, 01:07 PM
  #66  
FO
 
phoenixc130's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2015
Position: 73N
Posts: 250
Default

Are we pay protected for the 2-day “no fly” period after receiving the COVID vaccine? I just received an appointment that is a day before one of my rotations.
phoenixc130 is offline  
Old 01-25-2021, 02:07 PM
  #67  
Banned
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Feb 2020
Position: Gummed
Posts: 1,060
Default

Originally Posted by ShyGuy View Post
Where did ANYONE say 3.2 million dead were from the virus?

Good grief to you. Covid deniers/hoaxers like you have a problem with simple numbers and reading comprehension.

The DM article quoted CDC, and since DM wasn't good for you, I posted the actual CDC total death count.

I'll say it slow so even you can understand:

2.8 million dead in 2018 OVERALL

2.83 million dead in 2019 OVERALL

Those are the "normal" TOTAL death numbers in two years. Annually, we lose about 2.8 to 2.9 million people from ALL causes. This is total deaths.

But 2020 is 3.2 million total deaths. The average of 2.8 to 2.9 million deaths total was exceeded. Something set that off, and the additional ~350k deaths are from Covid 19. And then you had all the other deaths that you'd normally have in America every year, 2.8-2.9 million.

The whole point of this exercise is to DISPROVE Covid deniers like you who keep insisting Covid hasn't killed more than the normal expected deaths of Americans in a year, and that Covid deaths are counted as people dying with covid as opposed to from covid.

Fine, IF that was true, then overall you should still have seen 2.8 to 2.9 million dead Americans total for 2020.

That clearly was not the case. Total deaths for 2020 from all causes was 3.2 million.

Clear as mud?
I've never denied the cold bug.

I've never said it was a hoax.

I do say the data, information and response to this cold bug with a 99.98% survival rate for those under 60 has been way overreacted and inflated.

I was right about several things and will be continued to be vindicated. Cases, origin and soon "death" numbers.

Relax dude, and I think it is you with the comprehension issues.

NGFRetard calls me crazy yet he doesn't deny I've been right thus far - well except for joe sitting at the resolute desk... but hey I read it on infowars.com it was a movie set and not real.
Phins2right is offline  
Old 01-25-2021, 04:09 PM
  #68  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2016
Posts: 6,716
Default

Originally Posted by Phins2right View Post
I've never denied the cold bug.

I've never said it was a hoax.

I do say the data, information and response to this cold bug with a 99.98% survival rate for those under 60 has been way overreacted and inflated.

I was right about several things and will be continued to be vindicated. Cases, origin and soon "death" numbers.

Relax dude, and I think it is you with the comprehension issues.

NGFRetard calls me crazy yet he doesn't deny I've been right thus far - well except for joe sitting at the resolute desk... but hey I read it on infowars.com it was a movie set and not real.
Just trying to sort through a lot of comments over the past months. how many US deaths do you think this pandemic has caused, and on what do you base this estimate?
OOfff is offline  
Old 01-25-2021, 05:08 PM
  #69  
Coverage Award...
 
LumberJack's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2016
Posts: 1,305
Default

Originally Posted by phoenixc130 View Post
Are we pay protected for the 2-day “no fly” period after receiving the COVID vaccine? I just received an appointment that is a day before one of my rotations.
The FA's get 6 hours I believe so it's possible? Seems like an easy sick call if not.
LumberJack is offline  
Old 01-25-2021, 06:00 PM
  #70  
Gets Weekends Off
 
velosnow's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2010
Posts: 1,170
Default

Originally Posted by OOfff View Post
Just trying to sort through a lot of comments over the past months. how many US deaths do you think this pandemic has caused, and on what do you base this estimate?
You have more patience than myself, I've long blocked the crazies like Phins & Xtreme just ain't worth the effort. COVID 'discussion' threads are one thing, the loons on the Extreme are another.
velosnow is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
buggs
Cargo
11
08-09-2008 05:02 PM
scrapdog
Major
3
04-17-2008 07:41 AM
COTriple7
Major
0
07-19-2007 11:20 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices