COVID moved Posts 1
#61
So you post a research article for the sole purpose of supporting your claim that HCQ is the key to COVID treatment, but deny the claim that mask wear is essential, which comes from the same article. Do I have that right?
I’m still waiting for you to address the Biden Resolute Desk claim you made in December. After you address that you can address the above. After you address those, I’ll answer whatever question you have for me about the “Lancet retraction.”
Second request: Please have your wife proofread your rants. Thanks in advance.
#62
Banned
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Feb 2020
Position: Gummed
Posts: 1,060
So you post a research article for the sole purpose of supporting your claim that HCQ is the key to COVID treatment, but deny the claim that mask wear is essential, which comes from the same article. Do I have that right?
I’m still waiting for you to address the Biden Resolute Desk claim you made in December. After you address that you can address the above. After you address those, I’ll answer whatever question you have for me about the “Lancet retraction.”
Second request: Please have your wife proofread your rants. Thanks in advance.
I’m still waiting for you to address the Biden Resolute Desk claim you made in December. After you address that you can address the above. After you address those, I’ll answer whatever question you have for me about the “Lancet retraction.”
Second request: Please have your wife proofread your rants. Thanks in advance.
No. you don't
HCQ is an effective treatment. I said that back in June. Lancet was cited on this board as denying it as well.
Well now, AJM says it is an effective, viable TREATMENT for the china flu. Lancet just retracted their summer article denouncing HCQ as being an effective TREATMENT. Masks do not enter the TREATMENT realm there doctor McCoy.
How much more obvious do I need to be with you there top knot? The facts don't lie. HCQ proven to work. Previous were lies politically motivated.
Practicing doctors, like my wife, use it effectively despite what a bureaucrat tells them. Go find a FFF Fauxhi patient and ask them.....oh wait.
My wife has better things to do than humor your idiotic requests.
You should loosen that top knot, it is cutting off the oxygen to your brain (or maybe its the triple masks you wear??) - whatever - you need to lighten up and enjoy life.
Fly safe. Have a great weekend.
#63
COVID moved Posts 1
Keep waiting. You have no power here.
No. you don't
HCQ is an effective treatment. I said that back in June. Lancet was cited on this board as denying it as well.
Well now, AJM says it is an effective, viable TREATMENT for the china flu. Lancet just retracted their summer article denouncing HCQ as being an effective TREATMENT. Masks do not enter the TREATMENT realm there doctor McCoy.
How much more obvious do I need to be with you there top knot? The facts don't lie. HCQ proven to work. Previous were lies politically motivated.
Practicing doctors, like my wife, use it effectively despite what a bureaucrat tells them. Go find a FFF Fauxhi patient and ask them.....oh wait.
My wife has better things to do than humor your idiotic requests.
You should loosen that top knot, it is cutting off the oxygen to your brain (or maybe its the triple masks you wear??) - whatever - you need to lighten up and enjoy life.
Fly safe. Have a great weekend.
No. you don't
HCQ is an effective treatment. I said that back in June. Lancet was cited on this board as denying it as well.
Well now, AJM says it is an effective, viable TREATMENT for the china flu. Lancet just retracted their summer article denouncing HCQ as being an effective TREATMENT. Masks do not enter the TREATMENT realm there doctor McCoy.
How much more obvious do I need to be with you there top knot? The facts don't lie. HCQ proven to work. Previous were lies politically motivated.
Practicing doctors, like my wife, use it effectively despite what a bureaucrat tells them. Go find a FFF Fauxhi patient and ask them.....oh wait.
My wife has better things to do than humor your idiotic requests.
You should loosen that top knot, it is cutting off the oxygen to your brain (or maybe its the triple masks you wear??) - whatever - you need to lighten up and enjoy life.
Fly safe. Have a great weekend.
You: “HQC is an effective treatment for COVID! Read this article!”
Me: “That article says mask wear is essential to containing infection.”
You: “Why won’t you talk about the Lancet retraction??! You have a man bun!”
#64
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Posts: 8,898
Where did ANYONE say 3.2 million dead were from the virus?
Good grief to you. Covid deniers/hoaxers like you have a problem with simple numbers and reading comprehension.
The DM article quoted CDC, and since DM wasn't good for you, I posted the actual CDC total death count.
I'll say it slow so even you can understand:
2.8 million dead in 2018 OVERALL
2.83 million dead in 2019 OVERALL
Those are the "normal" TOTAL death numbers in two years. Annually, we lose about 2.8 to 2.9 million people from ALL causes. This is total deaths.
But 2020 is 3.2 million total deaths. The average of 2.8 to 2.9 million deaths total was exceeded. Something set that off, and the additional ~350k deaths are from Covid 19. And then you had all the other deaths that you'd normally have in America every year, 2.8-2.9 million.
The whole point of this exercise is to DISPROVE Covid deniers like you who keep insisting Covid hasn't killed more than the normal expected deaths of Americans in a year, and that Covid deaths are counted as people dying with covid as opposed to from covid.
Fine, IF that was true, then overall you should still have seen 2.8 to 2.9 million dead Americans total for 2020.
That clearly was not the case. Total deaths for 2020 from all causes was 3.2 million.
Clear as mud?
#65
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2020
Posts: 454
Where did ANYONE say 3.2 million dead were from the virus?
Good grief to you. Covid deniers/hoaxers like you have a problem with simple numbers and reading comprehension.
The DM article quoted CDC, and since DM wasn't good for you, I posted the actual CDC total death count.
I'll say it slow so even you can understand:
2.8 million dead in 2018 OVERALL
2.83 million dead in 2019 OVERALL
Those are the "normal" TOTAL death numbers in two years. Annually, we lose about 2.8 to 2.9 million people from ALL causes. This is total deaths.
But 2020 is 3.2 million total deaths. The average of 2.8 to 2.9 million deaths total was exceeded. Something set that off, and the additional ~350k deaths are from Covid 19. And then you had all the other deaths that you'd normally have in America every year, 2.8-2.9 million.
The whole point of this exercise is to DISPROVE Covid deniers like you who keep insisting Covid hasn't killed more than the normal expected deaths of Americans in a year, and that Covid deaths are counted as people dying with covid as opposed to from covid.
Fine, IF that was true, then overall you should still have seen 2.8 to 2.9 million dead Americans total for 2020.
That clearly was not the case. Total deaths for 2020 from all causes was 3.2 million.
Clear as mud?
Good grief to you. Covid deniers/hoaxers like you have a problem with simple numbers and reading comprehension.
The DM article quoted CDC, and since DM wasn't good for you, I posted the actual CDC total death count.
I'll say it slow so even you can understand:
2.8 million dead in 2018 OVERALL
2.83 million dead in 2019 OVERALL
Those are the "normal" TOTAL death numbers in two years. Annually, we lose about 2.8 to 2.9 million people from ALL causes. This is total deaths.
But 2020 is 3.2 million total deaths. The average of 2.8 to 2.9 million deaths total was exceeded. Something set that off, and the additional ~350k deaths are from Covid 19. And then you had all the other deaths that you'd normally have in America every year, 2.8-2.9 million.
The whole point of this exercise is to DISPROVE Covid deniers like you who keep insisting Covid hasn't killed more than the normal expected deaths of Americans in a year, and that Covid deaths are counted as people dying with covid as opposed to from covid.
Fine, IF that was true, then overall you should still have seen 2.8 to 2.9 million dead Americans total for 2020.
That clearly was not the case. Total deaths for 2020 from all causes was 3.2 million.
Clear as mud?
#67
Banned
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Feb 2020
Position: Gummed
Posts: 1,060
Where did ANYONE say 3.2 million dead were from the virus?
Good grief to you. Covid deniers/hoaxers like you have a problem with simple numbers and reading comprehension.
The DM article quoted CDC, and since DM wasn't good for you, I posted the actual CDC total death count.
I'll say it slow so even you can understand:
2.8 million dead in 2018 OVERALL
2.83 million dead in 2019 OVERALL
Those are the "normal" TOTAL death numbers in two years. Annually, we lose about 2.8 to 2.9 million people from ALL causes. This is total deaths.
But 2020 is 3.2 million total deaths. The average of 2.8 to 2.9 million deaths total was exceeded. Something set that off, and the additional ~350k deaths are from Covid 19. And then you had all the other deaths that you'd normally have in America every year, 2.8-2.9 million.
The whole point of this exercise is to DISPROVE Covid deniers like you who keep insisting Covid hasn't killed more than the normal expected deaths of Americans in a year, and that Covid deaths are counted as people dying with covid as opposed to from covid.
Fine, IF that was true, then overall you should still have seen 2.8 to 2.9 million dead Americans total for 2020.
That clearly was not the case. Total deaths for 2020 from all causes was 3.2 million.
Clear as mud?
Good grief to you. Covid deniers/hoaxers like you have a problem with simple numbers and reading comprehension.
The DM article quoted CDC, and since DM wasn't good for you, I posted the actual CDC total death count.
I'll say it slow so even you can understand:
2.8 million dead in 2018 OVERALL
2.83 million dead in 2019 OVERALL
Those are the "normal" TOTAL death numbers in two years. Annually, we lose about 2.8 to 2.9 million people from ALL causes. This is total deaths.
But 2020 is 3.2 million total deaths. The average of 2.8 to 2.9 million deaths total was exceeded. Something set that off, and the additional ~350k deaths are from Covid 19. And then you had all the other deaths that you'd normally have in America every year, 2.8-2.9 million.
The whole point of this exercise is to DISPROVE Covid deniers like you who keep insisting Covid hasn't killed more than the normal expected deaths of Americans in a year, and that Covid deaths are counted as people dying with covid as opposed to from covid.
Fine, IF that was true, then overall you should still have seen 2.8 to 2.9 million dead Americans total for 2020.
That clearly was not the case. Total deaths for 2020 from all causes was 3.2 million.
Clear as mud?
I've never said it was a hoax.
I do say the data, information and response to this cold bug with a 99.98% survival rate for those under 60 has been way overreacted and inflated.
I was right about several things and will be continued to be vindicated. Cases, origin and soon "death" numbers.
Relax dude, and I think it is you with the comprehension issues.
NGFRetard calls me crazy yet he doesn't deny I've been right thus far - well except for joe sitting at the resolute desk... but hey I read it on infowars.com it was a movie set and not real.
#68
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2016
Posts: 6,716
I've never denied the cold bug.
I've never said it was a hoax.
I do say the data, information and response to this cold bug with a 99.98% survival rate for those under 60 has been way overreacted and inflated.
I was right about several things and will be continued to be vindicated. Cases, origin and soon "death" numbers.
Relax dude, and I think it is you with the comprehension issues.
NGFRetard calls me crazy yet he doesn't deny I've been right thus far - well except for joe sitting at the resolute desk... but hey I read it on infowars.com it was a movie set and not real.
I've never said it was a hoax.
I do say the data, information and response to this cold bug with a 99.98% survival rate for those under 60 has been way overreacted and inflated.
I was right about several things and will be continued to be vindicated. Cases, origin and soon "death" numbers.
Relax dude, and I think it is you with the comprehension issues.
NGFRetard calls me crazy yet he doesn't deny I've been right thus far - well except for joe sitting at the resolute desk... but hey I read it on infowars.com it was a movie set and not real.
#69
#70
You have more patience than myself, I've long blocked the crazies like Phins & Xtreme just ain't worth the effort. COVID 'discussion' threads are one thing, the loons on the Extreme are another.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post