CX500T

Now compare the suicide numbers CY 19 vs CY 20. Going into the holidays we had already matched 19, and holidays usually have half the annual numbers.

Excargodog

A more recent update:

LumberJack

For what time periods? It can't be every week below the curve. I used the flu seasons (Dec to Mar), and to help your argument, I excluded the excess from prior years, which you still haven't addressed.

LumberJack

This tells us what we already knew. Younger, generally fit people who contract COVID are less likely to die from it.

Buck Rogers

And just to point out an interesting subset of the chart, look at strictly the military component.....15 deaths out of 126k personnel. That is about 1 death per 100,000. I use this subset because the military can't enforce fitness standards on the civilian/dependent/contractor contingent. I would be interested in the 15 deaths on a deep dive into data. All 15 could be, "gosh, Covid and Covid alone is responsible", or they could be, "Well, they died in a car wreck while being Covid positive". Not that it matters....Covid kills. But so does drunk driving, smoking, diabetes, suicide, slips and falls, drugs. .If the governments job is the safety and welfare of it's citizens, there are a lot of issues that still need to be tackled. Isn't that the real reason for combating climate change?. To impose government laws/sanctions to effect climate change for the betterment of society?

There are two types of zoos. In South Africa National Parks, the animals are free to roam about, and the humans are fenced in at night to protect them. In a standard zoo, the animals are fenced in and the humans are free to mosey about. Both systems strive to protect the humans while still allowing interaction. Which type of "zoo" does the Covid response need to mimic?......... Beats me.

Phins2right

So in just one day dear leader has now shown us:

1. PCR cycle tests were too high - according to the WHO. Thus yielding a high "false positive" rate. Yet reported as "cases" nonetheless. I've said this since summer. Maybe CNN/MSNBC/ABC/CBS/FOX can keep up now.

2. Stanford has piped up and said lock downs don't work. Congrats Stanford. You've joined 78,000 doctors and scientists in stating that fact. That list includes several Nobel laureates in related fields.

3. More studies surfacing of the efficacy of mask wear (they don't do ****).

Seems dear leader will, by virtue of his placement, be the Godsend savior of the world WRT to china flu. Who woulda thunk it?

PS - I expect my stalkers to reply in less than 24 hours.

Iceberg

Attempting to delegitimize any response to your claims before any responses have been made? Shouldn’t you wait to see the counterpoints before attacking them?

LumberJack

1. PCR tests have always been the most sensitive. That doesn't negate every PCR test ever given. We also have antibody and antigen tests, further diluting the drama you create.

2. That news was from October...

3. Source?

PS - Make credible arguments.

GucciBoy

Phins, isn’t this your woman?

https://thehill.com/policy/healthcar...onnection-with

Phins2right

The 70000+ fringe medical doctors and Nobel laureates that have come out with the same position as Simone?

No Simone is not my wife. She is brave to speak up about this absurdity and is right about it. Again, why not go ask one of Fauxchis patients about it....oh wait.... he never had any.

However, Dr Gold does have living patients - thanks to her treatment - that you can talk to. I don't take my "news" from the reporters who strive to make news rather than report it. I'll take my information from the professionals who actually treat patients.

Tell, me when is mask wear going to end then? What is the end state?

You have no idea do you. I'll give you a hint - it rhymes with vicinity.

Keep drinking the Jone's beverage.