New Hire Class Drops
#3731
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2016
Posts: 6,716
just relaying info I got from people in the know
#3733
Line Holder
Joined APC: Dec 2016
Posts: 86
Anyone know why there hasn’t been any DTW 73NB on any drops recently? It’s been a couple months at least. It seems to be an understaffed category judging by the fact my phone rings off the hook every day with GS offers. Just curious why it hasn’t been included.
#3734
Who’s going to forsake 2600 lb. fuel flows with nearly 200 folks seated?
#3735
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2015
Position: LAX ER
Posts: 1,606
New type to overwater, new dispatchers that speak 321 but not Pacific, some pilots new to the theater, but not as many as one might assume. These little kinks will sort out; it’s not like saying “ everyone else flies some sort of 737, we can make a -900 work.”
Who’s going to forsake 2600 lb. fuel flows with nearly 200 folks seated?
Who’s going to forsake 2600 lb. fuel flows with nearly 200 folks seated?
#3736
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jun 2016
Posts: 430
I wrote in another thread that two days ago I had a conversation with a dispatcher about the NEO’s and Hawaii flying. He stated they were padding the fuel numbers by an additional 10-15% over etops mins until they were able to establish their own reliable baseline data. Those tech stops should be minimized moving forward.
#3737
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Aug 2011
Position: Hoping for any position
Posts: 2,511
I wrote in another thread that two days ago I had a conversation with a dispatcher about the NEO’s and Hawaii flying. He stated they were padding the fuel numbers by an additional 10-15% over etops mins until they were able to establish their own reliable baseline data. Those tech stops should be minimized moving forward.
#3738
Can’t find crew pickup
Joined APC: Jun 2021
Posts: 2,037
This is a pretty standard practice. We have to establish our own data. Airlines don’t share their data amongst themselves (and why would they) and Airbus can only provide what the engineers think. We did this with the 220 and the 900neo. Nothing new. I’ve talked to JB guys that do a lot of island flying out of JFK and they discussed block fuel and it was significantly less than a standard 321. This will work itself out.
#3739
I wrote in another thread that two days ago I had a conversation with a dispatcher about the NEO’s and Hawaii flying. He stated they were padding the fuel numbers by an additional 10-15% over etops mins until they were able to establish their own reliable baseline data. Those tech stops should be minimized moving forward.
#3740
Yes, new type to Hawaii for Delta. Plenty of info available from other operators, but not always heeded. That was the point of my 737 analogy; the numbers must have been "thin" going in, but Delta was convinced they could do wonders with the 737 fleet to Hawaii. For the NEO, the only real problem I've seen so far is a big hit departing OGG on a wet runway ... unlike a 757-200, a wet grooved runway isn't "dry" and Delta was not aware of that impact until the flight I was on highlighted the problem. I believe somebody else may have stated this already, but the SFO tech stops out of SEA were most likely a one-off thing that could have/should been avoided by flying a lengthier route outside the freakishly targeted Jetstream. It was a rookie dispatching oversight.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post