Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Delta (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/)
-   -   PSC Vs Medical Insurance (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/140236-psc-vs-medical-insurance.html)

jaxsurf 11-04-2022 05:19 PM


Originally Posted by saturn (Post 3526613)
If we don't get PSC, then pilots commuting should have their pass rider priority follow the logic of Jumpseats priority:
TO WORK = S1B
FROM WORK = S1C

Airfix flying for leisure = S2/S3

I think this is a great idea.

Half the fun of it would be seeing the boomers howl about how their sEnIoRiTy iS BeInG vIoLaTeD :rolleyes:

Shakinthefat 11-04-2022 06:05 PM


Originally Posted by overqualified52 (Post 3526594)
I think the biggest thing that hackles people’s feathers is that we still have a positive space to get to work if we give ourselves 2 flights but the fact that there are 35 percent less flights than pre Covid makes it difficult for the 2 flight rule ,so until the flight frequencies go back to pre Covid levels the policy should still remain for PS one flight to work . I was hired early 90’s and for many , many years we had no PS to work . It was great when the Union got the new commute policy for positive space second flight but that was at a time when there were way more flights than now . Also (at least in my opinion ) if we are able to get positive space to work then we should be good enough to get positive space home after completing the trip and making money for the company (Delta/Endeavor) . That’s the real issue with this whole thing is getting positive space home and just having 1 ps flight to work until the frequency of flights returns pre Covid . If we are important enough to get to work , then we should be important enough to get PS home . It should be a priority with the Union and the company considering over half the DL/9E pilots are commuters . Nothing should have to be given up for it . PS to and from work should be a normal part of Airline operations and life moving forward. I guess it’s probably a 70/30 split on how everyone feels about keeping it with 70 percent for keeping it ? Feel free to throw food at me 😂

Commuted for 30+ years. Was told in new hire indoc that commuting was your choice and the company will not have any leeway on missed commute flights. Non rev only for many years, Coat and tie or uniform for non rev, $30 RT payroll deduction under 10 yrs of service. There was No JS option. Then the company closed 5-6 bases so you could grab a JS thru duty CP (beeper) only to work ( sometimes you could beg for JS going home) and only within 15 min of departure when it looked like you were no going to get on. Finally got JS privilege (pilot/FA) and a “call it honest” policy. As long as you had a backup, crew scheduling would reserve a PS seat on backup flight. Then Covid hits and we are given PS to and from.
My point is, the company has always determined how commuting pilots get to and from work, you play their game and hopefully get to/from work without a struggle.

Iceberg 11-04-2022 06:30 PM


Originally Posted by overqualified52 (Post 3526594)
I think the biggest thing that hackles people’s feathers is that we still have a positive space to get to work if we give ourselves 2 flights but the fact that there are 35 percent less flights than pre Covid makes it difficult for the 2 flight rule ,so until the flight frequencies go back to pre Covid levels the policy should still remain for PS one flight to work . I was hired early 90’s and for many , many years we had no PS to work . It was great when the Union got the new commute policy for positive space second flight but that was at a time when there were way more flights than now . Also (at least in my opinion ) if we are able to get positive space to work then we should be good enough to get positive space home after completing the trip and making money for the company (Delta/Endeavor) . That’s the real issue with this whole thing is getting positive space home and just having 1 ps flight to work until the frequency of flights returns pre Covid . If we are important enough to get to work , then we should be important enough to get PS home . It should be a priority with the Union and the company considering over half the DL/9E pilots are commuters . Nothing should have to be given up for it . PS to and from work should be a normal part of Airline operations and life moving forward. I guess it’s probably a 70/30 split on how everyone feels about keeping it with 70 percent for keeping it ? Feel free to throw food at me 😂

Are you still at Endeavor? It seems like you guys may have better luck getting it than us. Probably before we even settle global scope language.

saturn 11-04-2022 06:54 PM


Originally Posted by jaxsurf (Post 3526644)
I think this is a great idea.

Half the fun of it would be seeing the boomers howl about how their sEnIoRiTy iS BeInG vIoLaTeD :rolleyes:

For my route, fares right now are about 3 to $400 one way. That's close to 3k month. That really adds up as an FO. Also, doesn't work too well if on reserve.

Funny how I never hear people complain about all the PSC to and from ATL for SIM. Maybe we should say, commute to ATL, primary and back up? Think of all the precious revenue the enterprise is missing out on by giving all the non ATL pilots free rides to training. You knew where SIMs were when you got hired. Living outside ATL is a choice.

overqualified52 11-04-2022 06:57 PM


Originally Posted by jaxsurf (Post 3526639)
It really is dumb. PSC does not erode anyone’s seniority. Everyone still gets on as a non-rev according to their date of hire.

Also, it blows my mind that people who make upwards of $200k/year don’t just buy tickets. We even have a discounted option! You know what our loads are like, you’re making the conscious choice to do that to yourself.

Stop being such cheapskates. It’s pathetic and embarrassing hearing highly compensated pilots whine about nonrevving. It’s like seeing boomers scream at fast food employees for getting their order slightly wrong. Embarrassing.

I worked Fast food back in the early 80’s during high school . Got snarled at many a time by young people . Not sure where it’s exclusive to “Boomers” who get mad at fast food workers. So if we had to buy confirmed space for less tickets every time to get home , wouldn’t we still be bumping off other “Non Revs” ? Why would you be an advocate for having us buy tickets when we should just simply be able to list positive space home as a working crew member . Yes we “choose” to not live in base . If the airlines made everyone live in base they would not be able to employ nearly enough pilots and Flight Attendants, otherwise the airlines would have forced that along time ago . I’ve been doing this for almost 30 years ,plus the years as a Flight attendant in the 80’s for a Major airline that sadly has been gone for a long time now. The old way of doing things for 50 years regarding commuting pilots and Flight attendants needs to be put out of its misery and time to embrace a new way . Commuting pilots and flight attendants generate hundreds of millions of dollars of revenue . PS to and from work is and should be a no brainer . I believe JB will have it in their contract soon .

overqualified52 11-04-2022 07:28 PM


Originally Posted by Iceberg (Post 3526676)
Are you still at Endeavor? It seems like you guys may have better luck getting it than us. Probably before we even settle global scope language.

we just piggyback from you guys/gals at mainline . We are still just the “regional” no matter what they pay 😂. You guys deserve a new contract asap . Hopefully at some point they will just Absorb Endeavor .

TegridyFarms 11-04-2022 07:44 PM


Originally Posted by bode (Post 3526515)
Is it? Or is it honesty that you don’t like? I have a preference and one vote. So do you. Just like tons of people have posted they are not ok with ALPA putting energy into something that will never help them. That’s how I feel on this, what’s wrong with that?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

You elect to vote down any contract that contains improvements to health insurance, unless it contains PSC.

That is what you said in your original post.

Which is completely one sided, ignorant, and selfish. We already have positive space. You just need a primary flight that you miss, and then they’ll positive space you.

I have an absolutely terrible commute. Yet I make it to and from work 99% of the time. I’ve been a commuter since 2006 and I can count on two hands the number of times I got “stuck.” Does commuting suck? Yes. Am I gonna vote down a contract JUST BECAUSE it doesn’t contain PSC, while it improves health insurance for my coworkers who need/use it (even if I don’t) ? F no.

You’re part of something bigger than yourself. Don’t be that guy. Using your logic: I am not an alcoholic or drug addict so ALPA should stop using union dues to help those that are through the HIMS program. Just add whatever you spend on that to my dues refund. Sounds pretty selfish and ignorant, right?

DisMyGamerTag 11-04-2022 09:12 PM


Originally Posted by bode (Post 3526443)
In light of all the people completely ecstatic we have lost the PSC I have decided to vote down any contract which provides improvements to our medical coverage and does not contain PSC. Reason being I utilized the PSC commute but do not utilize Delta’s medical. I know I’m not the only one who doesn’t use the Delta medical.

Now I know this is going to draw a lot of hate, but I want it to be stated, it’s as ridiculous as people saying the end of the LOA was a good thing.

Opinions? Am I wrong? Seems to make sense to me…


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

After the contract is signed I’m fine if they figure some sort of x number of positive space tickets we can all use whether you commute or not. I would use mine for vacations.

I support that. After a contract is signed.

But I’m not paying/negotiating for others to commute while I suck it up and live in subpar Georgia, pay for private schools to make up for lackluster state schools, and drive through a crime infested Atlanta to go to work.

Hawaii50 11-04-2022 09:20 PM


Originally Posted by jaxsurf (Post 3526639)
It really is dumb. PSC does not erode anyone’s seniority. Everyone still gets on as a non-rev according to their date of hire.

Also, it blows my mind that people who make upwards of $200k/year don’t just buy tickets. We even have a discounted option! You know what our loads are like, you’re making the conscious choice to do that to yourself.

Stop being such cheapskates. It’s pathetic and embarrassing hearing highly compensated pilots whine about nonrevving. It’s like seeing boomers scream at fast food employees for getting their order slightly wrong. Embarrassing.

Non-reving has always been one of the benefits with this job, a long time before you or I got here. Sorry it embarrasses you (apparently twice in this paragraph). Too bad you didn't mention how embarrassing it was at your interview.

PilotJ3 11-04-2022 09:49 PM


Originally Posted by DisMyGamerTag (Post 3526712)
After the contract is signed I’m fine if they figure some sort of x number of positive space tickets we can all use whether you commute or not. I would use mine for vacations.

I support that. After a contract is signed.

But I’m not paying/negotiating for others to commute while I suck it up and live in subpar Georgia, pay for private schools to make up for lackluster state schools, and drive through a crime infested Atlanta to go to work.

Its your decision to suck it up and live in subpar GA. :rolleyes:

There are plenty of bases and cities to choose.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:53 PM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands