Notices

Scope Language out

Old 01-18-2023 | 06:48 AM
  #61  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2017
Posts: 1,104
Likes: 6
From: 737 A
Default

Originally Posted by brakechatter
You need to read the agreement again. The Company can throw a narrow body on RDU-CDG, but it won't count towards the hours that they have to put on a wide body. Plus there is additional protections in Section 3 should they decide to send narrowbodies over the ocean on a regular basis.
I’m not worried of Delta throwing a NB I’m worried about our partner swapping to NBs and driving down our required WB via the ratio. The only protection on this is the 80% floor. I wonder if 20% of block hours is possible to swap to NB? I’m not sure if it is, but it doesn’t give me a warm fuzzy feeling that we failed to account for this possibility.
Reply
Old 01-18-2023 | 07:42 AM
  #62  
notEnuf's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 13,215
Likes: 663
From: ir.delta.com
Default

Originally Posted by Vsop
I’m not worried of Delta throwing a NB I’m worried about our partner swapping to NBs and driving down our required WB via the ratio. The only protection on this is the 80% floor. I wonder if 20% of block hours is possible to swap to NB? I’m not sure if it is, but it doesn’t give me a warm fuzzy feeling that we failed to account for this possibility.
This is what I was thinking. You know there will be another flag of convenience scam carrier like Norwegian at some point. Our "partners" (read Delta management) will want to compete head to head and voilà.
Reply
Old 01-18-2023 | 07:57 AM
  #63  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2017
Posts: 916
Likes: 6
Default

Originally Posted by Gspeed
I don’t necessarily disagree, but how close are we talking? More or less than 4 years?
I haven't a clue. I did my best reading through the Global Scope TA and while a lot of it sounds good the lack of NB protection is a concern to me, especially given the emphasis on protecting against supersonic aircraft. I'd put the former as a a higher threat than the latter. Could be 5 years, could be 20. Maybe it's knocking on our door before the amendable date and we're all wondering why they didn't think of that.
Reply
Old 01-18-2023 | 08:37 AM
  #64  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 2,286
Likes: 18
Default

Originally Posted by myrkridia
Maybe it's knocking on our door before the amendable date and we're all wondering why they didn't think of that.
This is why I posed the rhetorical. I think it's potentially a threat but I personally don't foresee it being one within the next 5ish years.
Reply
Old 01-18-2023 | 12:27 PM
  #65  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2017
Posts: 916
Likes: 6
Default

Originally Posted by Gspeed
This is why I posed the rhetorical. I think it's potentially a threat but I personally don't foresee it being one within the next 5ish years.
Yes. I'm not even necessarily saying this is a deal breaker, there's plenty of good stuff in this GSTA. I'm just trying to understand why supersonic was perceived as a more imminent threat than NB toward WB flying.
Reply
Old 01-18-2023 | 01:27 PM
  #66  
Trip7's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 6,131
Likes: 192
Default

Global Scope TA sent to MEMRAT unanimously. Impressive
Reply
Old 01-19-2023 | 06:08 AM
  #67  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 352
Likes: 2
Default

My worry isn't NB flying across the Atlantic by a partner, it's NB flying to South America by LATAM. They already have 16 A320neo. Those planes can do a lot of north South America to ATL and MIA. And they won't be limited by this TA.
Reply
Old 01-19-2023 | 06:17 AM
  #68  
Thread Starter
Line Holder
 
Joined: Sep 2020
Posts: 313
Likes: 56
Default

Originally Posted by DELTAFO
My worry isn't NB flying across the Atlantic by a partner, it's NB flying to South America by LATAM. They already have 16 A320neo. Those planes can do a lot of north South America to ATL and MIA. And they won't be limited by this TA.
There will be a forthcoming Scope notepad regarding NB flying that will put everyone's mind to ease over this.
Reply
Old 01-19-2023 | 06:28 AM
  #69  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2020
Posts: 2,607
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by Trip7
Global Scope TA sent to MEMRAT unanimously. Impressive
I didn’t see that coming. Honestly I thought it might be more contentious than the AIP/TA.

As an aside, I understand they can’t send everything out at once, but for future ref a quick FAQ would go a long way. Stuff like this NB block hours etc, to “head it off at the pass” before we run away.
Reply
Old 01-19-2023 | 06:55 AM
  #70  
Thread Starter
Line Holder
 
Joined: Sep 2020
Posts: 313
Likes: 56
Default

Originally Posted by DELTAFO
My worry isn't NB flying across the Atlantic by a partner, it's NB flying to South America by LATAM. They already have 16 A320neo. Those planes can do a lot of north South America to ATL and MIA. And they won't be limited by this TA.
Right now Latam uses a mix of WB and NB to and from SA. We do a lot of NB flying North and South as well on the 75. Probably will do it on the 321N at some point soon. We do a lot of SA on the 350/ER..flying that could easily be on an NB, but we are using more WBs. I guess I just don't quite get your point? Just imagine if we focused this scope on NBs primarily.. we would have everyone on here saying "look..Delta plans to fly NBs while our partners fly WBs."

There will be more information coming out. I think we just need to breathe a bit. Scope is obviously a complex issue that everyone that requires a lot of education to clear it up. ELI5 etc.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Guard Dude
Delta
201736
04-06-2022 06:59 AM
nwa757
American
178
01-10-2015 10:54 AM
APC225
United
81
05-04-2013 07:08 AM
B1900YX
Major
50
10-14-2010 06:30 AM
AAflyer
Major
101
03-27-2010 06:39 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices