![]() |
Originally Posted by igotgummed
(Post 3715505)
Of course he didn’t. Just like he didn’t read anything other than his “ignored” 4th pillar.
Originally Posted by FangsF15
(Post 3715524)
Id just like to point out that at JB’s level of pay, 1 vs. 2 is irrelevant, as that “spill cash” will come to him by 31 Dec regardless. It’s just a matter of if he opted out of the MBCPB for which account it goes into.
Id also like to +1 Extenda’s excellent post above. Very well put. JB reread your couple posts here, and then Scoop’s. Consider the tone of each, and which one you find more compelling. Unless you just want to rant… |
Originally Posted by JamesBond
(Post 3715630)
Yep you got me. I didn't read a thing.
Enjoy your batch sizes |
Originally Posted by JamesBond
(Post 3715630)
Yep you got me. I didn't read a thing.
Enjoy your batch sizes |
Originally Posted by igotgummed
(Post 3715633)
I’m doing great with the batch sizes. Plenty of greenslips. Oh wait…..those were gonna disappear with this contract, right?
Same pilots: where muh GS?! |
Originally Posted by igotgummed
(Post 3715633)
I’m doing great with the batch sizes. Plenty of greenslips. Oh wait…..those were gonna disappear with this contract, right?
|
Originally Posted by Whoopsmybad
(Post 3715473)
I want to know what you define as a “not new pilot”. Pre 2014? Pre 9/11? Pre you? I honestly want to know where that line is if the people you despise so much.
|
Originally Posted by Hotel Kilo
(Post 3715700)
2007 and forward. I never said I dislike anyone. You and a few others just got bent out of shape at the word I used. Noob. Yes compared to me and a few other seniors here, you are noobs. Noobs to Delta Air Lines. Noobs to this management "team". The fact you get bent on a word (as you often are hostile to myself and others here) it really demonstrates where we are at doesn't it. Pay attention to how DALPA responds to the latest shot across our bow from BP (really from JL, PB, and RG et al.) Another strongly worded letter? Or will we actually see some action from the MEC. The anticipation is riveting...
|
Originally Posted by notEnuf
(Post 3715709)
16 year noob, hmmm. I have to disagree. In other words, everyone not on property for 9/11. But if you were hired in July of 2001 and furloughed until 2007, that's some how not noob.
|
I think what he means is, when they hire a pilot with a date of birth after your date of hire, you are officially no longer a noob.
|
Originally Posted by NuGuy
(Post 3715711)
What about a fNWA hired in 2001, but merged in with a 2007 hire. Does that make them a retro-noob?
|
Originally Posted by Hotel Kilo
(Post 3715700)
Pay attention to how DALPA responds to the latest shot across our bow from BP (really from JL, PB, and RG et al.) Another strongly worded letter? Or will we actually see some action from the MEC. The anticipation is riveting...
Maybe they'll at least throw us a bone and tell us we can take our hats off again this winter. At least that would be something, and it probably aggravates management the worst of all the paltry options. But the best option would be a a major dispute lawsuit over management's blatant thumbing their noses at us and saying they won't keep their deals (no longer a rule of the road). PB's comment that nothing is illegal until an arbitrator decides it is should go down as the next biggest F-up they've made after Ed's comments on CNBC that we can't strike. The ramifications should be commensurate. As the kids say, "he said the quiet part out loud". |
Originally Posted by Hotel Kilo
(Post 3715700)
2007 and forward. I never said I dislike anyone. You and a few others just got bent out of shape at the word I used. Noob. Yes compared to me and a few other seniors here, you are noobs. Noobs to Delta Air Lines. Noobs to this management "team". The fact you get bent on a word (as you often are hostile to myself and others here) it really demonstrates where we are at doesn't it. Pay attention to how DALPA responds to the latest shot across our bow from BP (really from JL, PB, and RG et al.) Another strongly worded letter? Or will we actually see some action from the MEC. The anticipation is riveting...
the way you talk dude. Try and comport yourself like you arent hiding behind a keyboard and you’ll probably gain more traction. Less vitriol, less antagonism, less condescension. theres no way you would act like this to another dudes face, maybe dont do that here. Youll find more willing recipients |
Originally Posted by Hubcapped
(Post 3715770)
is your SA really so low that you cant understand why you garner hostility?
the way you talk dude. Try and comport yourself like you arent hiding behind a keyboard and you’ll probably gain more traction. Less vitriol, less antagonism, less condescension. theres no way you would act like this to another dudes face, maybe dont do that here. Youll find more willing recipients |
Originally Posted by Hubcapped
(Post 3715770)
is your SA really so low that you cant understand why you garner hostility?
the way you talk dude. Try and comport yourself like you arent hiding behind a keyboard and you’ll probably gain more traction. Less vitriol, less antagonism, less condescension. theres no way you would act like this to another dudes face, maybe dont do that here. Youll find more willing recipients BTW that "act in your face" comment is threatening. You might want to read the TOS for this site. You are doing and acting precisely what you just chastised me about. Hypocrite much? Oh, and my comport is just fine junior, thank you. I'll keep it right where its at. Let's focus on the topic at hand, management. Adjust your fire and target the real issue(s). Anything from the MEC yet? |
Originally Posted by Hotel Kilo
(Post 3715906)
I'm actually, well I used to be a very public and accessible part of FOPs. I left that game many years ago when Grinstein brought EB back to Delta. About the time I saw EB ascending in 2009-10ish I knew it was time to go back to the line and just do my thing.
You shouldn't be so bitter young man. BTW that "act in your face" comment is threatening. You might want to read the TOS for this site. You are doing and acting what you chastise me about. Hypocrite much? |
Originally Posted by CBreezy
(Post 3715909)
How is that threatening?
Now, back to the real issue here - management. |
Originally Posted by Hotel Kilo
(Post 3715912)
You can't be that dense. Oh wait, yeah, you can.
|
Originally Posted by Hotel Kilo
(Post 3715912)
Pretty obvious the intent of the comment he made. If you can't see it, I can't help.
Now, back to the real issue here - management. |
Originally Posted by Hotel Kilo
(Post 3715912)
Pretty obvious the intent of the comment he made. If you can't see it, I can't help.
Now, back to the real issue here - management. |
Originally Posted by Hotel Kilo
(Post 3715906)
I'm actually, well I used to be a very public and accessible part of FOPs. I left that game many years ago when Grinstein brought EB back to Delta. About the time I saw EB ascending in 2009-10ish I knew it was time to go back to the line and just do my thing.
BTW that "act in your face" comment is threatening. You might want to read the TOS for this site. You are doing and acting precisely what you just chastised me about. Hypocrite much? Oh, and my comport is just fine junior, thank you. I'll keep it right where its at. Let's focus on the topic at hand, management. Adjust your fire and target the real issue(s). Anything from the MEC yet? # 2. it was “act in a dudes face” not “act in your face”, the distinction is paramount to your insinuation. You either knowingly skewed the words to play the martyr like a child or your reading comprehension es no bueno # 3. When 5 other people agreed, its not up to you to say your behavior is ok, a good pilot would take the debrief and learn from it #4. If you truly believed you were being threatened, and failed to understand its advice for you to be able to actually reach people, i just pity you. So i will say it again in exactly the same way. You wouldnt act like this to a dudes face, so maybe dont act like a condescending, vitriol spitting, aggressive a-hole here, and you will get more traction with your comments. If you feel like that is a threat, you literally cannot comprehend english. can you imagine being an old timer and this scared of the world? Holeee fuk no thank you |
Originally Posted by Eddiewouldgo
(Post 3713278)
“Nothing’s a contract violation until an arbitrator says it’s a contract violation.”
VP-Flight Operations and System Chief Pilot Believe it or not this was actually said. I guess we can now see why “always keep your deals” was taken out of the rules of the road this year. Why would anybody go the extra mile when the company management makes a statement like this? |
Originally Posted by overqualified52
(Post 3716112)
Hasn’t this been the airline MGT playbook now for about 50 years or more ? Continental and Eastern were the worst at violating contracts .
|
It is management's total disdain for it's pilots that had me racing for the door when the veop was offered. I have never worked for any organization that had such total disregard for me as an employee. They went out of their way to make life difficult. Even the military embraced me more than dal......And that's pretty bad.
|
Yep. As predicted, the special MEC meeting resulted in another Strongly Worded Email and another video from Hartmann acting angry. Yeah, that'll do it. I'm sure Ed is shaking in his $500 sneakers. Oh and another stupid billboard outside ATL airport that management will also laugh at. No major dispute lawsuit. No media campaign. No wage theft complaint (which they have all the evidence they need for). DALPA has become the poster child of impotence.
So are we at least going hatless? Not a word from our "leadership" on tangible displays of unity. Business as usual. Shut up, row, and pay your union dues. |
Originally Posted by Nick Bradshaw
(Post 3716324)
Yep. As predicted, the special MEC meeting resulted in another Strongly Worded Email and another video from Hartmann acting angry. Yeah, that'll do it. I'm sure Ed is shaking in his $500 sneakers. Oh and another stupid billboard outside ATL airport that management will also laugh at. No major dispute lawsuit. No media campaign. No wage theft complaint (which they have all the evidence they need for). DALPA has become the poster child of impotence.
So are we at least going hatless? Not a word from our "leadership" on tangible displays of unity. Business as usual. Shut up, row, and pay your union dues. I’ll attend and get some insight on our top secret coded payroll tickets; I applaud them for at least initiating that, but it’s certainly not something to lead with or be taken seriously by management. |
Originally Posted by Nick Bradshaw
(Post 3716324)
Yep. As predicted, the special MEC meeting resulted in another Strongly Worded Email and another video from Hartmann acting angry. Yeah, that'll do it. I'm sure Ed is shaking in his $500 sneakers. Oh and another stupid billboard outside ATL airport that management will also laugh at. No major dispute lawsuit. No media campaign. No wage theft complaint (which they have all the evidence they need for). DALPA has become the poster child of impotence.
So are we at least going hatless? Not a word from our "leadership" on tangible displays of unity. Business as usual. Shut up, row, and pay your union dues.
Originally Posted by OpsCheckOK
(Post 3716342)
Hard to believe that we are not initiating a wage theft lawsuit and going “hats off” or something else that bothers them in the meantime. Their solution is to pass the buck so we, the dues paying pilots can become accountants and payroll specialists.
I’ll attend and get some insight on our top secret coded payroll tickets; I applaud them for at least initiating that, but it’s certainly not something to lead with or be taken seriously by management. |
Originally Posted by Hotel Kilo
(Post 3716358)
As predicted. Disappointed but not surprised. Clear now that DH is gunning for that primo FOPs management job on the 4th floor. This memo was paltry, ineffectual acquiesced to management and now, to top it all off, we have to do homework assignments just to get properly paid? This is a joke. This is minium a hats off and lawsuit filed moment. IDK maybe that's forthcoming. But it is Friday, so I'm sure the hospitality suite is rocking about now (5 o'clock somewhere amIright?).
Mongo |
Originally Posted by MongoC5
(Post 3716389)
I think y’all just are looking for a reason to not wear your hats lol😂 🎩
Mongo |
Originally Posted by Gunfighter
(Post 3716400)
The management team does not disappoint. They are giving us plenty of reasons. Full pay for a full uniform. Top off my pay and I'll top off my uniform. I can't find something as smooth as "Hats off to a new contract" . Maybe we recycle that into "Hats off to keeping your deals." Hats off to honoring a contract.
|
Originally Posted by SkiBum95
(Post 3716523)
I like that “Full pay for full uniform” - ties and hats off
Untie our pay I'll refrain from any jacket removal slogans. |
Originally Posted by Gunfighter
(Post 3716720)
Untie our contract
Untie our pay I'll refrain from any jacket removal slogans. |
Quiet stealing = quiet quitting.
I stop for IROP 14* days of delays *(business) |
Has management always acted like this towards the pilot group? If not, when did things change? I wish I known before coming here. This is perhaps the worst culture Ive experienced in this industry.
|
Originally Posted by Machsp
(Post 3717114)
Has management always acted like this towards the pilot group? If not, when did things change? I wish I known before coming here. This is perhaps the worst culture Ive experienced in this industry.
As far as “the worst culture”…I’m not so sure…I have friends at FDX & SWA, they are pretty P.Off. |
Originally Posted by Machsp
(Post 3717114)
Has management always acted like this towards the pilot group? If not, when did things change? I wish I known before coming here. This is perhaps the worst culture Ive experienced in this industry.
QOL not tied to a particular contact is all you should care about. |
Originally Posted by Machsp
(Post 3717114)
Has management always acted like this towards the pilot group? If not, when did things change? I wish I known before coming here. This is perhaps the worst culture Ive experienced in this industry.
1. When it comes to safety, major life events (death in the family, cancer, major car accidents, hospitalization, etc), I have found the company does a fantastic job. That Culture is still healthy, IMO. I’ve had nothing but great experience with those kinds of things, and I’ve been on disability 2x, and dealt with spousal cancer. 2. Totally separate from that is contract compliance. There has always been some friction over legal “assignments”, pay, etc. And frankly, there always will be some “noise” there. Obviously, mgmt has pizzed off a big portion of the pilot group recently. While I do think that Covid caused noticeable shift, most of that was “just business”. In the early days, no one knew the impacts would be relatively short lived. Mgmt decisions were based in keeping the company solvent; then they were slow to return to a “normal” tenor, due to the 2 sides being less trusting of the other, compounded by contract negotiations. However, when the contract was signed, there was a very marked shift in contract compliance. ALPA Contract Admin noted that, despite historical norms of coming back together after a new contract, the company seemed to go the other way. Almost like they thought they got “rolled” in negotiations, and were looking to take it out on us by being intentionally difficult. While it pizzes me off to no end that they are weaponizing and renegotiating the contract by non-compliance, 99% of things are indisputable. We will win some of these grievances - the real meat is in the penalty. If they aren’t made to pay for their BS shenanigans, it will only embolden them to take more sections “hostage”. All that said, the “culture” here, while not super healthy, could be sooooooo much worse. Like most folks have no idea how much worse. So I’m not sure I’d agree it’s toxic. At least not yet. |
Company currently has me royally ****ed off still.
I'm spending more than my mortgage payment on a drug that's in the formulary, covered by our insurance, that a non MD in HR has ruled my wife doesn't need. Needs it because of a brain tumor but if she was a 400 pound diabetic who doesn't even care about their blood sugar or diet they'd pay. |
Originally Posted by FangsF15
(Post 3717137)
Couple things to note here.
1. When it comes to safety, major life events (death in the family, cancer, major car accidents, hospitalization, etc), I have found the company does a fantastic job. That Culture is still healthy, IMO. I’ve had nothing but great experience with those kinds of things, and I’ve been on disability 2x, and dealt with spousal cancer. 2. Totally separate from that is contract compliance. There has always been some friction over legal “assignments”, pay, etc. And frankly, there always will be some “noise” there. Obviously, mgmt has pizzed off a big portion of the pilot group recently. While I do think that Covid caused noticeable shift, most of that was “just business”. In the early days, no one knew the impacts would be relatively short lived. Mgmt decisions were based in keeping the company solvent; then they were slow to return to a “normal” tenor, due to the 2 sides being less trusting of the other, compounded by contract negotiations. However, when the contract was signed, there was a very marked shift in contract compliance. ALPA Contract Admin noted that, despite historical norms of coming back together after a new contract, the company seemed to go the other way. Almost like they thought they got “rolled” in negotiations, and were looking to take it out on us by being intentionally difficult. While it pizzes me off to no end that they are weaponizing and renegotiating the contract by non-compliance, 99% of things are indisputable. We will win some of these grievances - the real meat is in the penalty. If they aren’t made to pay for their BS shenanigans, it will only embolden them to take more sections “hostage”. All that said, the “culture” here, while not super healthy, could be sooooooo much worse. Like most folks have no idea how much worse. So I’m not sure I’d agree it’s toxic. At least not yet. Its their own fault if they feel they got “rolled over”. Nobody asked them to go to mediation and nobody asked them to go on national TV and say we can’t strike. We also got the “take it or l’ll put you on ice”. We took the best of the outcome for that particular moment. |
REALITY vs. AIRLINE CONTRACTS
A “No funny” satire Now comes the honorable Plaintiff REALITY with a complaint of breach and damages in its contractual relationship with AIRLINE CONTRACTS. Namely that intentional and fraudulent violations do not fit under the “fly it now, grieve it later” clause. Defendants AIRLINE CONTRACTS moves to dismiss stating REALITY does not exist and therefore has no standing as a party to complain. Defendants AIRLINE CONTACTS also moves to have the introduced evidence, a petition from the pilot group (signed in blood from their @$$ez), thrown out as hearsay and irrelevant. REALITY counters that it does exist and that a simple 3 step testing process using nothing moar than a suitable pair of yoga pants can produce observable, measurable, and repeatable conclusive results to prove it has standing. REALITY provides the steps as follows; 1. Find a suitable pair of yoga pants. 2. Grab yoga pants at any location to determine “suitability” and acceptability of the material. 3. Observe reality; A. Reality is readily discernible if you find yourself knee’d to the nuts, hammer fisted all the way to the ground followed by a few additional kicks and a final face stomp. Reality may include yelling, cursing, spitting, or additional unmentionable tortures. B. If reality is indiscernible, return the yoga pants to your sister or mom and find a “suitable” pair of yoga pants for this reality test. REALITY attests that several conclusions can be deduced from these observations; 1. Reality does exist 2. Reality can be in your face painful when provoked 3. Reality will not fly it now, grieve it later when intentionally wronged 4. Reality will not “exhaust administrative resources” prior to seeking remedial action 5. Reality displays the time tested maxim “for every wrong there IS a remedy” REALITY moves to grant justice to the Plaintiff and award damages as stated in the complaint. AIRLINE CONTRACTS is silent on the matter preoccupied with holding their groin, spitting blood, and mumbling “mommy” or something as insignificant. |
Originally Posted by sf340b
(Post 3717176)
REALITY vs. AIRLINE CONTRACTS
A “No funny” satire Now comes the honorable Plaintiff REALITY with a complaint of breach and damages in its contractual relationship with AIRLINE CONTRACTS. Namely that intentional and fraudulent violations do not fit under the “fly it now, grieve it later” clause. Defendants AIRLINE CONTRACTS moves to dismiss stating REALITY does not exist and therefore has no standing as a party to complain. Defendants AIRLINE CONTACTS also moves to have the introduced evidence, a petition from the pilot group (signed in blood from their @$$ez), thrown out as hearsay and irrelevant. REALITY counters that it does exist and that a simple 3 step testing process using nothing moar than a suitable pair of yoga pants can produce observable, measurable, and repeatable conclusive results to prove it has standing. REALITY provides the steps as follows; 1. Find a suitable pair of yoga pants. 2. Grab yoga pants at any location to determine “suitability” and acceptability of the material. 3. Observe reality; A. Reality is readily discernible if you find yourself knee’d to the nuts, hammer fisted all the way to the ground followed by a few additional kicks and a final face stomp. Reality may include yelling, cursing, spitting, or additional unmentionable tortures. B. If reality is indiscernible, return the yoga pants to your sister or mom and find a “suitable” pair of yoga pants for this reality test. REALITY attests that several conclusions can be deduced from these observations; 1. Reality does exist 2. Reality can be in your face painful when provoked 3. Reality will not fly it now, grieve it later when intentionally wronged 4. Reality will not “exhaust administrative resources” prior to seeking remedial action 5. Reality displays the time tested maxim “for every wrong there IS a remedy” REALITY moves to grant justice to the Plaintiff and award damages as stated in the complaint. AIRLINE CONTRACTS is silent on the matter preoccupied with holding their groin, spitting blood, and mumbling “mommy” or something as insignificant. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:32 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands