![]() |
What management thinks of us
“Nothing’s a contract violation until an arbitrator says it’s a contract violation.”
VP-Flight Operations and System Chief Pilot Believe it or not this was actually said. I guess we can now see why “always keep your deals” was taken out of the rules of the road this year. Why would anybody go the extra mile when the company management makes a statement like this? |
Originally Posted by Eddiewouldgo
(Post 3713278)
“Nothing’s a contract violation until an arbitrator says it’s a contract violation.”
VP-Flight Operations and System Chief Pilot Believe it or not this was actually said. I guess we can now see why “always keep your deals” was taken out of the rules of the road this year. Why would anybody go the extra mile when the company management makes a statement like this? |
Originally Posted by Eddiewouldgo
(Post 3713278)
“Nothing’s a contract violation until an arbitrator says it’s a contract violation.”
VP-Flight Operations and System Chief Pilot Believe it or not this was actually said. I guess we can now see why “always keep your deals” was taken out of the rules of the road this year. Why would anybody go the extra mile when the company management makes a statement like this? I think ALPA found the another lanyard slogan: “A contract is a contract” to be opposite of “Always Keep your deals” |
Originally Posted by Vsop
(Post 3713281)
Not that I don’t believe you but, where/when was this said? Did I miss an email?
I think ALPA found the another lanyard slogan: “A contract is a contract” to be opposite of “Always Keep your deals” It was said at a base visit. Someone posted the clip on FB. I think the entire video is on skyhub. |
Originally Posted by Vsop
(Post 3713281)
Not that I don’t believe you but, where/when was this said? Did I miss an email?
I think ALPA found the another lanyard slogan: “A contract is a contract” to be opposite of “Always Keep your deals” |
Originally Posted by Eddiewouldgo
(Post 3713278)
“Nothing’s a contract violation until an arbitrator says it’s a contract violation.”
VP-Flight Operations and System Chief Pilot |
Originally Posted by Jaww
(Post 3713290)
I mean, he is not wrong. He just shouldn’t be saying the quiet part out loud.
So not being in position on short call isn't a violation until the arbitrator says so? Sweet, no punishment until the arbitrator can weigh in 🤣. |
The only thing I don't understand is why management chose this moment to provoke the pilot group. This is negotiations endgame playbook stuff, not first year of a new agreement stuff. It makes no sense, but it's definitely going to cost them a lot more money in the long run. Oh well.
|
Originally Posted by Nick Bradshaw
(Post 3713298)
The only thing I don't understand is why management chose this moment to provoke the pilot group. This is negotiations endgame playbook stuff, not first year of a new agreement stuff. It makes no sense, but it's definitely going to cost them a lot more money in the long run. Oh well.
|
Originally Posted by CBreezy
(Post 3713300)
The Bill Clinton playbook. Depends on what the definition of the word is, is. Does the contract say will? To me will means may. And may means not really..and not really means we can ignore 23L. All of it. Prove it otherwise and we'll abuse you for 6 months to a year until we decide to actually discuss it in front of an arbitrator.
|
Originally Posted by Nick Bradshaw
(Post 3713302)
Yeah. I saw that one. Your meme was funny.
|
Originally Posted by CBreezy
(Post 3713307)
I wish I could take credit. Was that on the infamous page?
(Dumb that APC won't let me say that word, even about myself. C'mon guys, stop the juvenile cent sore ship). (Oh, guess that word is banned too.) |
Originally Posted by Nick Bradshaw
(Post 3713319)
Yeah, I guess. If you figure out who's running it now, don't tell them they've got a boom e r dude lurking there. Funny page. Enjoy it a lot.
(Dumb that APC won't let me say that word, even about myself. C'mon guys, stop the juvenile cent sore ship). (Oh, guess that word is banned too.) |
Originally Posted by Jaww
(Post 3713290)
I mean, he is not wrong. He just shouldn’t be saying the quiet part out loud.
The act itself has already violated the law. Consequences can’t be applied until a guilty verdict is reached. |
Originally Posted by ancman
(Post 3713367)
He IS wrong. His quote is the equivalent of saying that knowingly committing a felony doesn’t violate the law until a judge or jury finds you guilty.
The act itself has already violated the law. Consequences can’t be applied until a guilty verdict is reached. |
Originally Posted by Jaww
(Post 3713368)
They are the only ones that lose. All that goodwill down the drain. PB has been a tool since Covid kicked off. Nothing more than a yes man.
|
Originally Posted by ancman
(Post 3713367)
He IS wrong. His quote is the equivalent of saying that knowingly committing a felony doesn’t violate the law until a judge or jury finds you guilty.
The act itself has already violated the law. Consequences can’t be applied until a guilty verdict is reached. |
Originally Posted by JamesBond
(Post 3713375)
No it isn't. Someday you'll learn that the money isn't the most important part to management. Ever wonder why everything else takes so long and the payrates happen seemingly overnight?
They know that certain acts are violations, and they’re willing to pay the small price to keep committing them. |
Originally Posted by ancman
(Post 3713378)
Sure, but PB realizing that he can violate the contract for a price isn’t the same as PB saying that nothing management can possibly do is a contract violation unless an arbitrator finds otherwise.
They know that certain acts are violations, and they’re willing to pay the small price to keep committing them. |
Originally Posted by ancman
(Post 3713378)
Sure, but PB realizing that he can violate the contract for a price isn’t the same as PB saying that nothing management can possibly do is a contract violation unless an arbitrator finds otherwise.
They know that certain acts are violations, and they’re willing to pay the small price to keep committing them. |
Originally Posted by Jaww
(Post 3713380)
Bingo. And it’s not illegal for them to allow it to go there. Ethical? That word no longer matters on Wall Street.
|
Originally Posted by Jaww
(Post 3713380)
Bingo. And it’s not illegal for them to allow it to go there. Ethical? That word no longer matters on Wall Street.
And it really shouldn't matter to the group. "It's business." Lol |
Originally Posted by JamesBond
(Post 3713379)
Y'all are acting like this is something new. Did you really think this contract 'fixed' anything? It just got your pay codified for transgressions and nothing more (for the most part).
|
Originally Posted by JamesBond
(Post 3713381)
It never did.
|
Originally Posted by ancman
(Post 3713384)
Nope. I never had any trust or confidence in our management before, during, or after the contract signing. Both ALPA and a segment of our pilot group became complacent toward this management team around the time of the contract signing, however. That’s a mistake.
GH and team were out of Raleigh by 2pm after dropping their 'last best 'offer. Think about that for a moment. They laughed all the way home. |
Originally Posted by JamesBond
(Post 3713375)
No it isn't. Someday you'll learn that the money isn't the most important part to management. Ever wonder why everything else takes so long and the payrates happen seemingly overnight?
|
Originally Posted by JamesBond
(Post 3713386)
Yeah but I'll bet you believed this MEC finally beat them.
GH and team were out of Raleigh by 2pm after dropping their 'last best 'offer. Think about that for a moment. They laughed all the way home. |
Originally Posted by ancman
(Post 3713388)
I voted no to this PWA. I’m the wrong person to address that one.
|
I care what management thinks of me the same amount they care what I think of them. These are how I prioritize things when it comes to work: my needs, the needs of the other pilot, the needs of the FA's, the needs of the passengers, the needs of any other frontline employee, and lastly the needs of the company. Sometimes all of those needs are in alignment. For example, everyone wins when I operate safely and don't crash. Generally it is to my and everyone else's benefit to arrive on time or early. If the FA's have been going all day without a meal, then I'm going to delay the flight to go get them some food. If I need to eat, sleep, or poop, I'm going to make sure that is taken care of properly before I ever worry about getting a flight off the gate. Unless it personally benefits me (generally by getting me done on the last day to go home) then I will rarely put in extra effort to prevent the operation from falling apart.
Management wants employees to go the extra mile for the company. Well the company won't even go the full mile they agreed to in the PWA let alone a single step extra. They are going to reap what they are sowing. |
Originally Posted by tennisguru
(Post 3713402)
Management wants employees to go the extra mile for the company. Well the company won't even go the full mile they agreed to in the PWA let alone a single step extra. They are going to reap what they are sowing. |
Originally Posted by Gspeed
(Post 3713403)
BP and RG will be in the ATL crew room on Monday. I hope someone reminds them of this.
|
Originally Posted by CBreezy
(Post 3713407)
Monday or Tuesday
|
I don’t SkyHub often because I loathe it but I surfed it tonight to get a vibe. Wow, the tone on both sides has changed. Temperatures are rising. A chief pilot actually got on there and admonished somebody and gave them a time and date to meet him. Praise in public and criticize in private. They are losing the ability to shape the narrative on their own propaganda site.
|
Originally Posted by 172skychicken
(Post 3713286)
Apparently at the NY base visit.
|
Originally Posted by Jaww
(Post 3713418)
I don’t SkyHub often because I loathe it but I surfed it tonight to get a vibe. Wow, the tone on both sides has changed. Temperatures are rising. A chief pilot actually got on there and admonished somebody and gave them a time and date to meet him. Praise in public and criticize in private. They are losing the ability to shape the narrative on their own propaganda site.
|
Originally Posted by CBreezy
(Post 3713425)
Was that in the FOP page?!
|
Originally Posted by Jaww
(Post 3713408)
Honestly, who cares what they say? It’s all propaganda and doublespeak. They can’t be trusted.
|
Originally Posted by Jaww
(Post 3713428)
Sure was. Some post about Houston hotels. Just peruse the topics on that page and it’s surly from both sides. Several instances of no straight answers. Guys not taking a breath before they type.
|
Originally Posted by Jaww
(Post 3713418)
A chief pilot actually got on there and admonished somebody and gave them a time and date to meet him. Praise in public and criticize in private. They are losing the ability to shape the narrative on their own propaganda site.
|
Originally Posted by Jaww
(Post 3713428)
Sure was. Some post about Houston hotels. Just peruse the topics on that page and it’s surly from both sides. Several instances of no straight answers. Guys not taking a breath before they type.
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:17 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands