Widget Seniority Accuracy
#15
Line Holder
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 933
Likes: 59
From: NBC
Can we make it 55? I want muh widebody A spot! Now! (Then we can make it 67 or 70).
Thats all this discussion is… a land grab. Anyone is free to “retire” whenever they want (contractual requirements met), up to the federally mandated age.
To the OP, if you’re making life decisions based on micro examination of retirement and upgrade predictions, you’re gonna have a disappointing career.
Lots and lots of 11 year FOs waiting for percentage triggers before they upgrade.
Thats all this discussion is… a land grab. Anyone is free to “retire” whenever they want (contractual requirements met), up to the federally mandated age.
To the OP, if you’re making life decisions based on micro examination of retirement and upgrade predictions, you’re gonna have a disappointing career.
Lots and lots of 11 year FOs waiting for percentage triggers before they upgrade.
#16
#17
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Dec 2017
Posts: 2,878
Likes: 66
Can we make it 55? I want muh widebody A spot! Now! (Then we can make it 67 or 70).
Thats all this discussion is… a land grab. Anyone is free to “retire” whenever they want (contractual requirements met), up to the federally mandated age.
To the OP, if you’re making life decisions based on micro examination of retirement and upgrade predictions, you’re gonna have a disappointing career.
Lots and lots of 11 year FOs waiting for percentage triggers before they upgrade.
Thats all this discussion is… a land grab. Anyone is free to “retire” whenever they want (contractual requirements met), up to the federally mandated age.
To the OP, if you’re making life decisions based on micro examination of retirement and upgrade predictions, you’re gonna have a disappointing career.
Lots and lots of 11 year FOs waiting for percentage triggers before they upgrade.
#19
Line Holder
Joined: Nov 2018
Posts: 332
Likes: 17
#20
Cthulhu only swims left.
Hard to imagine the FAA coming out and saying "Oops, turns out that statistically >60 was a huge mistake. Let's go back, effective immediately."
(But of course, it hasn't been. At least accident wise. LTD costs are a separate issue.)
Hard to imagine the FAA coming out and saying "Oops, turns out that statistically >60 was a huge mistake. Let's go back, effective immediately."
(But of course, it hasn't been. At least accident wise. LTD costs are a separate issue.)
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



