Search

Notices

Pilot FLOP event

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-23-2026 | 06:25 PM
  #11  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Oct 2021
Posts: 93
Likes: 33
Default

OP must be drinking some Kool Aid. It was neither informative nor honest.

RG was defensive, argumentative, only got one softball (and was not nice about the response). He got hit with payback days, reliability letters, preposted rest, and pay questions. The softball was about A350 future destinations… “places” was the response. Real classy.

They blamed the pilots for their problems, took NO accountability beyond a tip of the hat towards acknowledging the reliability letters were not artfully issued and that was only after being called out (rightfully so) by a brave former CP who told them exactly how it affected him.

He directly threatened the order book if reliability didn’t improve. Failed to acknowledge their lack of hiring as a source of issues but did say they’re hiring full bore (go figure how to square that circle).

Overall it was not an impressive showing for FOPS management.
Old 03-23-2026 | 06:27 PM
  #12  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2022
Posts: 2,294
Likes: 1,203
Default

Originally Posted by DisMyGamerTag
They just need everyone to lay out the data. The swipe to sick calls was claimed to be 4x higher than normal.
4x higher than when? The first day swipe to sick was made available? You’d be surprised how many pilots didn’t know of its existence for the first year or two.

Trust nothing that these guys say, especially during section 6.
Reply
Old 03-23-2026 | 06:36 PM
  #13  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2022
Posts: 2,294
Likes: 1,203
Default

Originally Posted by OneplusF
He directly threatened the order book if reliability didn’t improve. Failed to acknowledge their lack of hiring as a source of issues but did say they’re hiring full bore (go figure how to square that circle).

Overall it was not an impressive showing for FOPS management.
Whoops, he mistakenly brought his regional management playbook to the meeting. If only that tactic worked at a legacy.
Old 03-23-2026 | 06:38 PM
  #14  
Beef Chicken or Pasta
 
Joined: May 2021
Posts: 207
Likes: 286
Default

Originally Posted by OneplusF
OP must be drinking some Kool Aid. It was neither informative nor honest.

RG was defensive, argumentative, only got one softball (and was not nice about the response). He got hit with payback days, reliability letters, preposted rest, and pay questions. The softball was about A350 future destinations… “places” was the response. Real classy.

They blamed the pilots for their problems, took NO accountability beyond a tip of the hat towards acknowledging the reliability letters were not artfully issued and that was only after being called out (rightfully so) by a brave former CP who told them exactly how it affected him.

He directly threatened the order book if reliability didn’t improve. Failed to acknowledge their lack of hiring as a source of issues but did say they’re hiring full bore (go figure how to square that circle).

Overall it was not an impressive showing for FOPS management.
Thank you.
Reply
Old 03-23-2026 | 06:39 PM
  #15  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 12,547
Likes: 1,155
Default

Originally Posted by ancman
Whoops, he mistakenly brought his regional management playbook to the meeting. If only that tactic worked at a legacy.
If my memory is correct, he cut his teeth on the shutdown of Comair followed by managing the alter ego of Mesa Airlines, as if that's something to boast about. So he has plenty of pages in that regional playbook
Reply
Old 03-23-2026 | 07:19 PM
  #16  
Thread Starter
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2021
Posts: 1,331
Likes: 385
Default

Originally Posted by Verdell
A friend of mine attended the meeting.

Some key (subjective and opinion-based) takeaways:

1) The core purpose of the meeting was made very clear. What we call open time, FLOPS calls "demand." Demand has spiked since November and held high ever since. The reason for this is data-based increase in sick call usage, particularly on weekends. The reason for this increase was VERY strongly implied as sick leave abuse. It's supposed to be on all of us to help stop it.

2) The shotgun approach to the sick letters may have been off target, but something HAD to be done.

3) The moratorium on PB day usage was clearly due to the monetary cost. As in, washing payback days was costing too much money. It wasn't (or if it was, it was an afterthought) about operational reliability, despite what the FLOPS messaging stated.

4) They acted unaware, or at least less-than aware of the impacts pre-posted rest was causing disruption and inefficiencies for RES pilots.

5) PB days being converted to vacation isn't a big deal because they can plan ahead for it.

EDIT: Friend said there were probably 130+ pilots in attendance. 2 free beers each and yummy BBQ food. Lots more was talked about so the above is not nearly an exhaustive list. Lots of encouraging IT upgrades promised to be happening behind the scenes, for example.
Adding:

6) auto-accept was firmly on-target by the presenter(s) during the event as the reason trip coverage is taking longer.

FWIW, "by the presenter(s)" could be added to much of what is quoted above.

Last edited by Verdell; 03-23-2026 at 07:34 PM.
Reply
Old 03-23-2026 | 07:38 PM
  #17  
Hrkdrivr's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,503
Likes: 2
From: Fairly local
Default

Originally Posted by OneplusF
OP must be drinking some Kool Aid. It was neither informative nor honest.

RG was defensive, argumentative, only got one softball (and was not nice about the response). He got hit with payback days, reliability letters, preposted rest, and pay questions. The softball was about A350 future destinations… “places” was the response. Real classy.

They blamed the pilots for their problems, took NO accountability beyond a tip of the hat towards acknowledging the reliability letters were not artfully issued and that was only after being called out (rightfully so) by a brave former CP who told them exactly how it affected him.

He directly threatened the order book if reliability didn’t improve. Failed to acknowledge their lack of hiring as a source of issues but did say they’re hiring full bore (go figure how to square that circle).

Overall it was not an impressive showing for FOPS management.
What was the venue? Velvet or a base visit?
Reply
Old 03-23-2026 | 08:21 PM
  #18  
Line Holder
25M+ Airline Miles
20 Countries Visited
 
Joined: Jul 2023
Posts: 927
Likes: 306
Default

Originally Posted by OneplusF
He directly threatened the order book if reliability didn’t improve.
That's code for he's going to get fired if reliability doesn't improve.
Old 03-23-2026 | 08:29 PM
  #19  
Gunfighter's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
1M Airline Miles
On Reserve
Gets Weekends Off
50 Countries Visited
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 5,629
Likes: 654
Default

Originally Posted by Khantahr
That's code for he's going to get fired if reliability doesn't improve.
That's the best thing I've heard all year.
Old 03-23-2026 | 08:47 PM
  #20  
PilotJ3's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
15 Years
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 3,875
Likes: 122
Default

Lol…we are not a regional. We don’t care about plane orders, that’s not our job, their bonuses and jobs are the ones affected.

I expected nothing less…
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ag27
American
2
01-14-2024 09:16 AM
CAL EWR
Major
0
03-04-2008 04:42 PM
fireman0174
Major
5
01-20-2008 09:00 AM
BAPilot
Regional
11
10-26-2006 09:15 PM
MACH84
Cargo
1
09-13-2006 07:06 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices