Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp

Ahem, crybaby.... the guy you quoted appears to be voting yes.

Originally Posted by Superpilot92

Love DOTS, feel free to share more and any potential plans ;)

Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp (Post 1211030)

Ahem, crybaby.... the guy you quoted appears to be voting yes.

Originally Posted by SailorJerry (Post 1211027)

I just don't get it. All of you are so hard line against this deal without any reason to be. It's as if you don't understand what exactly you are entitled to. Even if oil tanked and the economy surged, if AMR, and UCAL pilots waived their scope clauses and agreed to a 50% pay cut then what do you think we'd have as negotiating capital, even if there were billions of dollars flowing in the door. Unfortunately for us those dollars don't belong to us, as Delta is a publicly traded company with investors and share holders much more "entitled" to that money than a labor group covered by the RLA. We are at the service of the department of transportation and department of commerce at prevailing market wages. End of story.

In addition the con arguments towards the TA, are in fact, disingenuous in terms of the greater "collective" good of the pilot group. Rather than listen to ALPA you've mocked them, made false statements against them, ridiculed them, and effectively ignored their well reasoned logic in your bizarre and twisted logic about loopholes and threats from the CPO with regard to your sick time.

Perhaps the old adage, do unto others as you'd have others do unto you applies her - you're getting what you asked for.

And don't be so sensitive. We're all men here. Don't cry on your keyboard. It's ok.

Originally Posted by SailorJerry (Post 1210365)

I'm gonna be :mad: if this thing doesn't pass because I'll look at every no voter like he selfishly stole my $60,000. And I want my $60,000. I just hope that when it does pass you all see the error in your ways and work on some unity rather than your current disingenuous behavior.

Originally Posted by dalad (Post 1210203)

Sorry, I meant CHA. I remember as an MD-88 FO in the early 90's going to all those places including AGS.

Originally Posted by DeadHead

Mr. Pot I would like to introduce you to a friend of mine....Mr. Kettle

Originally Posted by SailorJerry (Post 1211068)

Does he have the contents of the sealed DIP modifying document? The company wouldn't put that kind of a bread crumb on the Internet.

Originally Posted by slowplay

The only difference between the sealed and redacted versions are identified in the document by asterisk notations (*****) where primarily competitively sensitive numbers have been removed. The rest of the language is there.