Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? >

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?


Notices

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Old 06-23-2012 | 02:21 AM
  #103841  
Carl Spackler's Avatar
Back on TDY
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 12,487
Likes: 0
From: 747-400 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by slowplay
From RA's own keyboard:

Q7. What is the latest with Delta’s fleet strategy? How do we plan to address our future fleet needs?
A. We continue to pursue an opportunistic fleet strategy that features acquisition and deployment of the most efficient aircraft available to meet the needs of our customers. We have employed this strategy to acquire both new and used aircraft to replace mainline (DC9s, older 757s) and regional (50-seat jets, Saab turboprops) aircraft. On the new side, we finalized a deal last summer with Boeing to purchase 100 new 737-900ER jets, which will begin delivery next year. On the used side, we have been buying MD-90s and will have 65 of these flexible, cost-efficient planes in service by the end of next year. You have probably also heard that the recent announcement of Delta’s tentative agreement with our pilots could provide the opportunity to accelerate the fleet strategy with the addition of 88 Boeing 717 aircraft to the mainline fleet, subject to pilot ratification of the agreement.

I'm sure the "cost neutral" (which was never said by management and only said by the C20 rep, btw) guys will now claim what used to be their burning bush is inaccurate...

It's a good strategy for you to continue to imply Captain Tucker is lying. It only makes his council's pilots more resolved to understand that you and alfaromeo have lied consistently from the start. Virtually every word you post is either a flat out lie, or so badly distorted it may as well be a lie. Tom's letter lays that all out very well.

Regardless of how this TA goes, it will be imperative to purge you, alfaromeo, O'Malley and every single person from the MEC administration. You have all failed so badly that I'm embarrassed to be associated with you. You've shamed this pilot group by your behavior and abuse of power.

Carl
Old 06-23-2012 | 04:46 AM
  #103842  
TANSTAAFL's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 784
Likes: 0
From: Still in one
Default

Originally Posted by slowplay
From RA's own keyboard:

Q7. What is the latest with Delta’s fleet strategy? How do we plan to address our future fleet needs?
A. We continue to pursue an opportunistic fleet strategy that features acquisition and deployment of the most efficient aircraft available to meet the needs of our customers. We have employed this strategy to acquire both new and used aircraft to replace mainline (DC9s, older 757s) and regional (50-seat jets, Saab turboprops) aircraft. On the new side, we finalized a deal last summer with Boeing to purchase 100 new 737-900ER jets, which will begin delivery next year. On the used side, we have been buying MD-90s and will have 65 of these flexible, cost-efficient planes in service by the end of next year. You have probably also heard that the recent announcement of Delta’s tentative agreement with our pilots could provide the opportunity to accelerate the fleet strategy with the addition of 88 Boeing 717 aircraft to the mainline fleet, subject to pilot ratification of the agreement.
Really? What do you expect Richard to say - if we reject the TA we are prepared to sweeten the pot?
Old 06-23-2012 | 05:33 AM
  #103843  
sinca3's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 917
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Bill Lumberg
You still don't understand.
Bill, it seems it's you that don't understand the other sides point! Have you even tried to see that side and have a constructive argument or debate?
I'm not saying either side is right, but you seem so hard up to prove your point and get Yes votes that you are failing to at least acknowledge the possibility of the con argument.
Old 06-23-2012 | 05:52 AM
  #103844  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 137
Likes: 6
From: DAL FO
Default

If you vote yes to this TA you extend the life of DCI. With more large rj's you decrease the delta pilots leverage for future negotiations. Our current language, and current uneconomical 50 seater's are much more powerful than the language proposed.

My personal opinion is that if you think the 717s are tied to this deal you aren't smart enough to cast a vote for this TA.

Guys are posting photos of 717 markings already painted in msp.

Do you think southwest airlines is going to hinge their entire fleet plan on how a bunch of delta pilots vote?

I've personally flown with numerous captains who have had FAA jumpseaters that state flat out that the 717's are a done deal.

How many more clues do you guys need?
Old 06-23-2012 | 06:04 AM
  #103845  
sinca3's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 917
Likes: 0
Default

The painted lines for the 717 have been their for years! I wouldn't put too much thought into that....I noticed it first time I flew into MSP over 5 years ago.
Old 06-23-2012 | 06:04 AM
  #103846  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 633
Likes: 0
From: A big one that looks like a little one
Default

Originally Posted by fly2002
If you vote yes to this TA you extend the life of DCI. With more large rj's you decrease the delta pilots leverage for future negotiations. Our current language, and current uneconomical 50 seater's are much more powerful than the language proposed.

My personal opinion is that if you think the 717s are tied to this deal you aren't smart enough to cast a vote for this TA.

Guys are posting photos of 717 markings already painted in msp.

Do you think southwest airlines is going to hinge their entire fleet plan on how a bunch of delta pilots vote?

I've personally flown with numerous captains who have had FAA jumpseaters that state flat out that the 717's are a done deal.

How many more clues do you guys need?
So wait a second? Vote no and the multi-billion dollar DCI contract termination costs suddenly just vanish and DCI goes away? You can't just sunset DCI. You can't.

And if the 88 717s are a done deal, would you rather get nothing? Why not take your money?

Fact. If we create a new fleet of SNB aircraft, DCI will shrink by 20% plus (under the TA, and without).

How does that work?
Old 06-23-2012 | 06:10 AM
  #103847  
olympic's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 731
Likes: 0
From: 747
Default

blah.......
Old 06-23-2012 | 06:13 AM
  #103848  
RonRicco's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 833
Likes: 5
From: Captain
Default

Originally Posted by fly2002
If you vote yes to this TA you extend the life of DCI. With more large rj's you decrease the delta pilots leverage for future negotiations. Our current language, and current uneconomical 50 seater's are much more powerful than the language proposed.

My personal opinion is that if you think the 717s are tied to this deal you aren't smart enough to cast a vote for this TA.

Guys are posting photos of 717 markings already painted in msp.

Do you think southwest airlines is going to hinge their entire fleet plan on how a bunch of delta pilots vote?

I've personally flown with numerous captains who have had FAA jumpseaters that state flat out that the 717's are a done deal.

How many more clues do you guys need?
Well.. I am glad to know that the FAA has seen the contracts between BA and Delta, but either way I am glad that Delta was gracious enough to throw nearly a billion dollars our way for no other reason to keep 70 CRJ's 700s meanwhile limiting the number of 76 seaters they would have otherwise had (716+88=111 addiotnal 76 seaters, or to the 255 limit), giving us JV protection etc.

Yep, all makes complete sense. You have it all figured out. As I understand it there will be all sorts of elections later this year including the negotiators. I think you would be an excellent choice as you can provide second hand information from FAA jump seaters to the MEC and they will make a very informed decision based on this excellent intel and this will certainly lead to a superior contract.
Old 06-23-2012 | 06:18 AM
  #103849  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 109
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Bill Lumberg
IF the TA goes through, there will be fewer of them allowed than if there is a no vote. A NO vote will ensure 255 of them. Yes, there would be fewer 70 seaters too, but the uneconomical 50s would stick around longer. Maybe you like those 50 seaters?
Bill,

If the TA is voted down:
How many main line aircraft would DAL need to add to have 255 76 seaters?
If achieved, would ALL 102 70 seaters have to be parked?

If the TA is voted in favor:
Where does it say they have to reduce 50 seaters? I can't find it.

Thanks.
Old 06-23-2012 | 06:22 AM
  #103850  
forgot to bid's Avatar
veut gagner ŕ la loterie
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 23,286
Likes: 0
From: Light Chop
Default

Originally Posted by Bill Lumberg
Who else thinks we at mainline can compete with these guys and their lower costs for the 76 seaters???
And if thats the case looking only at crew costs as you're doing, there is not a mainline aircraft they wouldn't operate cheaper than us.

So again, why not outsource the B717 Bill?

Why do you want to outsource the DC9-10 and not the DC9-30 sized airplanes?
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
On Autopilot
Regional
22617
11-05-2021 07:03 AM
AeroCrewSolut
Delta
153
08-14-2018 12:18 PM
Bill Lumberg
Major
71
06-13-2012 08:36 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices