![]() |
|
Originally Posted by Elvis90
(Post 1219938)
I think most fNWA pilots like this mgt better. My point was simply that 5 furloughs in 25 or so years is in the realm of possibility.
Carl |
Originally Posted by forgot to bid
(Post 1219861)
So the world economy is crashing, delta is posting a loss, and yet, I'm being told to vote yes for this TA because we're going to grow mainline anywhere from 70 to 110 jets!
Even with DCI 450/325, that's a huge jump in ASMs. |
I don't know about you but I will be glad when FRI is here and gone!
|
Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
(Post 1219985)
Now that is one damn funny post! But without outing myself, yes indeed my furloughs were seasonal that was typical back in the 70's.
Carl |
BTW: What do you guys want to talk about after this thing passes? Just wondering. :rolleyes: Dig dig
|
Originally Posted by Waves
(Post 1219997)
BTW: What do you guys want to talk about after this thing passes? Just wondering. :rolleyes:
|
Originally Posted by Waves
(Post 1219997)
BTW: What do you guys want to talk about after this thing passes? Just wondering. :rolleyes: Dig dig
UNDERBOOB! |
Originally Posted by NuGuy
(Post 1219764)
A NC that was SERIOUS about holding the line or improving scope (and empowered by the MEC to do so) would have simply walked out the first day when the 82 seaters were mentioned, and simply said "call us when you want to talk".
Instead it was left on the table, giving credibility to the company's postion. You have ask yourself "why?". Nu |
Originally Posted by scambo1
(Post 1219815)
In the AF, I was a Gazinia brother and had a squadron full of similarly immature brothers:
Roscoe, Tip, Pud, Dick, etc. You're bet sounds like we're getting a divorce...I don't like the concept of finding a woman I hate and then buying her a house.:D Finis; With you I'm a-ok with agreeing to disagree. |
Originally Posted by finis72
(Post 1220013)
Scambo, I am a-ok with it also, when people vote against the TA because they don't think it's good enough that's great, democracy in action. I do have a problem with agenda voters because a rejected TA does open up a window of opportunity for a group of wannabes.
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:16 AM. |
|
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands