![]() |
|
Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
(Post 1235596)
Point being, "they aint our passengers... who cares, maybe the next flight will cancel and I can go home early.
|
Originally Posted by Boomer
(Post 1235632)
From a secret company manual at an unnamed DCI carrier:
In response to Delta's continuing efforts to improve the customer service experience and build on its commitment to its customers, (secret airline's name here) new guidelines concerning passenger comfort restrictions on the aircraft are as follows:
BUT...did the Captain make the, "We have no lav, so Pee before you GO!" PA??:D And how long would it take to let everyone off to use the airport facility, then reboard them...? :eek: |
Deferring the only lav is unacceptable irregardless as to whether you make a lav inop announcement. Back in the 19 seat turboprop days it wasn't uncommon to have a pax go in a bottle and that was on a flight less than an hour.
Next subject please. |
Originally Posted by CAAC ATP
(Post 1235732)
Deferring the only lav is unacceptable irregardless as to whether you make a lav inop announcement. Back in the 19 seat turboprop days it wasn't uncommon to have a pax go in a bottle and that was on a flight less than an hour.
Next subject please. "irregardless" is not a word, and why move to the next subject? this is somewhat interesting...would you cancel a 60 min flight for no lav? |
Originally Posted by Seaslap8
(Post 1235741)
"irregardless" is not a word, and why move to the next subject? this is somewhat interesting...would you cancel a 60 min flight for no lav?
Speaking of opinions. A lavatory, if the only lavatory on board, should be a required item. I speak of this from experience operating 50 seat RJs and smaller turboprops. So yes, my opinion is you fix the lav or cancel the flight. Perhaps there should be a DCI thread where items such as this could be discussed. |
Originally Posted by CAAC ATP
(Post 1235732)
Deferring the only lav is unacceptable irregardless as to whether you make a lav inop announcement. Back in the 19 seat turboprop days it wasn't uncommon to have a pax go in a bottle and that was on a flight less than an hour.
Next subject please. |
Originally Posted by Seaslap8
(Post 1235741)
"irregardless" is not a word, and why move to the next subject? this is somewhat interesting...would you cancel a 60 min flight for no lav?
adverb, Nonstandard regardless Origin: 1910–15; ir-2 (probably after irrespective ) + regardless Can be confused: irregardless, regardless (see usage note at the current entry ). Usage note Irregardless is considered nonstandard because of the two negative elements ir- and -less. It was probably formed on the analogy of such words as irrespective, irrelevant, and irreparable. Those who use it, including on occasion educated speakers, may do so from a desire to add emphasis. Irregardless first appeared in the early 20th century and was perhaps popularized by its use in a comic radio program of the 1930s. |
What Delta transports employees in at the Atlanta airport:
http://buswrap.com/wp-content/upload...4/Delta-DS.jpg What Delta transports HVCs in at the Atlanta airport: http://www.9magazine.com/wp-content/...2/P11_0285.jpg What Delta transports Newk in once they realize the man is at the airport: http://i938.photobucket.com/albums/a...d/TEMP1-50.png |
evidently Delta then let's Mr. ER, or as we know him The Newk, take the car to Europe:
http://www2.airliners.net/uf/136327/...phpAZ8UCh.jpeg |
Hoser, in regards to your golden day incident, have you contacted Curtis over at ALPA? He's the former scheduler and worth talking to. Just follow the command prompts on the phone when you call there and you'll get him. He's helped me twice thus far.
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:52 PM. |
|
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands