![]() |
|
Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
(Post 1304179)
Preach it, Uncle Ferd!
NW/KLM type flying is the stated goal of marketing with less point-point flying, and this will be the same type deal. American with OneWorld (BA) has the biggest foothold in LHR. This would put DL in distant second, thus forcing UA to a very distant 3rd. Now we are looking at VA for the same reason IMHO. It won't kill American like the JAL thing would have........but it is a good shot to their already bruised rib areas. Ferd |
Originally Posted by Ferd149
(Post 1304177)
Just like the JAL deal,
Ferd I don't think Virgin will be cutting back on the trans-Atlantic. |
Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
(Post 1304042)
Michael Boyd thought of a take that I'm embarrassed that I did not consider. We know there has been friction between Delta and Air France over capacity restraint.
|
Originally Posted by Free Bird
(Post 1304185)
Could this then be a reduction in our codesharing/JV with Air France, only to be replaced by Virgin? Delta could send our pax to Heathrow to hub instead of Gay Paris?
http://www.virgin-atlantic.com/conte...tions/original |
Originally Posted by PilotFrog
(Post 1304188)
Except that VAtlantic isn't really into the local flights. They only do long haul.
http://www.virgin-atlantic.com/conte...tions/original |
Originally Posted by PilotFrog
(Post 1304188)
Except that VAtlantic isn't really into the local flights. They only do long haul.
http://www.virgin-atlantic.com/conte...tions/original |
Originally Posted by Rogue24
(Post 1304190)
Not true. Recently they have been adding short haul like MAN-LHR to connect to their international network.
|
Originally Posted by Wilbur Wright
(Post 1304184)
Actually I think the JAL deal would have been much better. It was my impression JAL was planning on cutting back their trans-Pacific flights so we could have been the ones flying wide bodies across the big pond to feed their Asian flights out of Tokyo. Plus it would have put a big hurt on AMR.
I don't think Virgin will be cutting back on the trans-Atlantic. Ferd |
Originally Posted by Free Bird
(Post 1304185)
Could this then be a reduction in our codesharing/JV with Air France, only to be replaced by Virgin? Delta could send our pax to Heathrow to hub instead of Gay Paris?
A: Delta and Air France are interested in getting control of Virgin Atlantic and will both maintain a minority ownership interest while codesharing. In effect, making Delta and Air France a sort of Limited Liability Partnership in "SkyTeam Airlines." If it makes money for Delta, management is pleased, or .... B: If Virgin continues to lose money, then we are defacto debtors in possession. If it goes out of business and we can get parts, or salvage and sell parts for more than we paid, well, that's good too. Singapore Airlines has lost money in their investment and had to pump precious cash into Virgin to keep it going. Frankly, we are in the best position to run Virgin for a profit; or profit from Virgin if she dies. Probably the next best suitor would be Emirates or Etihad. |
Originally Posted by PilotFrog
(Post 1304188)
Except that VAtlantic isn't really into the local flights. They only do long haul.
http://www.virgin-atlantic.com/conte...tions/original http://worldairlinenews.files.wordpr...-route-map.jpg |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:20 AM. |
|
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands