Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Posts: 4,953
![Default](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/icons/icon1.gif)
This goes along with what I have been saying for the last few years. I said late 2015 if the 65 year olds actually start leaving a year or two early (they're not). I just don't see any hiring in 2013 or 2014. If Johnso gets displaced off the ER, reality will sink in.
![hockeypilot44 is offline](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
![](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/clear.gif)
Moderator
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: B757/767
Posts: 13,088
![Default](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/icons/icon1.gif)
This goes along with what I have been saying for the last few years. I said late 2015 if the 65 year olds actually start leaving a year or two early (they're not). I just don't see any hiring in 2013 or 2014. If Johnso gets displaced off the ER, reality will sink in.
![Big Grin](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
![johnso29 is offline](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
Moderator
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: B757/767
Posts: 13,088
![Default](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/icons/icon1.gif)
![Frown](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/smilies/frown.gif)
![johnso29 is offline](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2008
Posts: 273
![Default](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I don't want to open up a can of worms but this is what I got. As you all know they PCL negotiating committee was dealing with Delta management and they anticipate hiring to start early 2014.
![Will is offline](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: May 2010
Position: 7ERA
Posts: 269
![Default](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Sailing,
So, you don't think it was reasonable for pilots to look a that memo assume that we would be hiring by now? The distinction between "in class" and "hiring process" is something trained lawyers should catch, not pilots.
At any rate, it's interesting to note that this "unanticipated event" that caused them to delay the hiring process, happened sometime between June - when the memo was posted - and October - when the hiring process was forecast to possibly start. What happened in those 3 months that was unanticipated and caused them to change their minds?
Finally, at the time, I don't remember anyone saying the company only planned on hiring 150 pilots based on a model that they would get 300 early retirements.
1.) How do you know this?
2.) If I'm right, why do you think they left this important detail out?
I bet a lot of yes voters might have thought differently if they knew the company was only going to hire 150 pilots at best. Maybe even Bill Lumberg would have toned it down a little.
![Roll Eyes (Sarcastic)](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/smilies/rolleyes.gif)
What Happened?
A Presidential election. That's not a political comment. Whoever won would allow all corporations to go with a certain set of facts. Not good or bad, just the truth.
![Rogue24 is offline](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: May 2010
Position: 7ERA
Posts: 269
![Rogue24 is offline](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
![Default](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I have no fancy graphs or hard numbers, but I'll just remind everyone that in a merger 1 + 1 does NOT = 3..........it equals 1.5.
Due to some contract language, but IMHO, due to not wanting this place to look like USAir, RA and the boys have carried a lot more pilots on the books than are necessary. If we would have furloughed, the last few years would have been a train wreck around here. But, we've gotten the chance to fly together, get to know each other and become one group.
I agree with FTB that this contract requires even fewer guys that the old contract, but I take our stagnation back farther than that. I guess in my mind, the question STILL remains, what would you be doing if we hadn't merged?
Ferd
Due to some contract language, but IMHO, due to not wanting this place to look like USAir, RA and the boys have carried a lot more pilots on the books than are necessary. If we would have furloughed, the last few years would have been a train wreck around here. But, we've gotten the chance to fly together, get to know each other and become one group.
I agree with FTB that this contract requires even fewer guys that the old contract, but I take our stagnation back farther than that. I guess in my mind, the question STILL remains, what would you be doing if we hadn't merged?
Ferd
![forgot to bid is offline](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
Moderator
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: B757/767
Posts: 13,088
![Default](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Seems plausible to me, continues our current shrinking trajectory. But let's just say it's too much, weren't there rumors of picking up some more 717s? Do a 20-30 more of those things and you have a flat capacity.
But you do have more mainline airframes. 30-40 in that scenario. Which if we multiply that by the 10.1 pilot ratio we're running on the 88 we'd end up with 300-400 more pilots? If we did 80 airplanes like the filing said and get to 797 total (i.e. 4% larger than we were 4 years ago) it's 800 more pilots?
Minus the more productive pilot efficiencies and we'd need to be hiring 3-7 pilots a month over the next six years. But we do have a contract in the middle of that and given our current trends in productivity, paying for our own jets and increasing jumbo RJs, who knows.
I'll be happy if in 2018 we still require 11,800 pilots.
But you do have more mainline airframes. 30-40 in that scenario. Which if we multiply that by the 10.1 pilot ratio we're running on the 88 we'd end up with 300-400 more pilots? If we did 80 airplanes like the filing said and get to 797 total (i.e. 4% larger than we were 4 years ago) it's 800 more pilots?
Minus the more productive pilot efficiencies and we'd need to be hiring 3-7 pilots a month over the next six years. But we do have a contract in the middle of that and given our current trends in productivity, paying for our own jets and increasing jumbo RJs, who knows.
I'll be happy if in 2018 we still require 11,800 pilots.
![johnso29 is offline](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Posts: 4,953
![Default](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I think it's safe to say that this is probably the most unreliable source on the planet. They were trying to sell the Pinnacle pilots the biggest pay cut in the history of the regionals. I think they would tell those guys anything to sell that thing. It worked.
![hockeypilot44 is offline](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
![Default](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/icons/icon1.gif)
They did but they also run 10.1 pilots on the 88, 12 on the 320 and 14 on the 737.
My bet is the one they would prefer is 10. That was from this past fall, let me calculate a new one at least on the 88...
showing 1732 with 167 jets or possibly 171? So 10.1 or maybe 10.4?
My bet is the one they would prefer is 10. That was from this past fall, let me calculate a new one at least on the 88...
showing 1732 with 167 jets or possibly 171? So 10.1 or maybe 10.4?
![forgot to bid is offline](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post