![]() |
|
Originally Posted by scambo1
(Post 1349193)
I agree the scam ship has largely sailed.
Awhile back, when rolling thunder was discovered as a little scam, I was actually schooled about it early on, by one of the greatest and recently retired schedulers during my tenure. I think it took about 3-4 months of doing it before DALPA gave it back...yes, gave. So you ask, what am I willing to give up...Nothing. What is my collective bargaining agent willing to give up? Seemingly everything that makes unionization worth paying for. FedEx has trip touching drops. They also don't have PBS. These, in my understanding, are two of the items their company is trying to get rid of right now in their negotiations. Someone besides me who tracks this stuff knows the rough percentage of jobs PBS cost us and also knows roughly what trips touching vacations cost us in jobs. You say we need more pay and QOL, I agree, the little "scams" give both. I think my record is fairly clear on where I stand on scope. What exactly did we give back to end rolling thunder. It's still alive and well as far as I know. The company pushed hard to stop the award of payback days on a reserve GS but did not succeed. |
Originally Posted by sailingfun
(Post 1349274)
What exactly did we give back to end rolling thunder. It's still alive and well as far as I know. The company pushed hard to stop the award of payback days on a reserve GS but did not succeed.
|
Originally Posted by sailingfun
(Post 1349274)
What exactly did we give back to end rolling thunder. It's still alive and well as far as I know. The company pushed hard to stop the award of payback days on a reserve GS but did not succeed.
|
Originally Posted by scambo1
(Post 1349290)
it used to pay much more to do it 1.5 or 2x plus payback days rather than 1x plus payback days.
I don't know if this is true. I heard rolling thunder happened because the company changed what green slips were worth to line holders, but did not change what they were worth to reserves. This caused the line holders to stop green slipping. The by-product was that almost all green slips went to the reserves which lead to rolling thunder. This won't happen now as line holders get most of the green slips due to seniority. It's hard to get more than one green slip these days as a junior pilot. |
Originally Posted by hockeypilot44
(Post 1349298)
I don't know if this is true. I heard rolling thunder happened because the company changed what green slips were worth to line holders, but did not change what they were worth to reserves. This caused the line holders to stop green slipping. The by-product was that almost all green slips went to the reserves which lead to rolling thunder. This won't happen now as line holders get most of the green slips due to seniority. It's hard to get more than one green slip these days as a junior pilot.
I made almost 10,000 less dollars in 2012 than I did in 2011! Although a major part of that is getting pushed back to no chance of holding a line on fifi. Sigh...What a fall... occasional lineholder on the 767 in ATL in 08/09 to dangling on the bottom of the 320 in 2013. +717! ;) |
Originally Posted by scambo1
(Post 1349290)
it used to pay much more to do it 1.5 or 2x plus payback days rather than 1x plus payback days.
|
Originally Posted by hockeypilot44
(Post 1349298)
I don't know if this is true. I heard rolling thunder happened because the company changed what green slips were worth to line holders, but did not change what they were worth to reserves. This caused the line holders to stop green slipping. The by-product was that almost all green slips went to the reserves which lead to rolling thunder. This won't happen now as line holders get most of the green slips due to seniority. It's hard to get more than one green slip these days as a junior pilot.
|
Originally Posted by scambo1
(Post 1349318)
That may well be the case. I dont remember the details exactly. Maybe an LOA, but it was about 5 years ago or so when rolling thunder became something to do.
|
Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
(Post 1349053)
Yes indeed. When I quoted Richard and Ed's written statements to the financial media that the TA was cost neutral, all the usual DALPA suspects called me a liar and said I was mis-stating the intent of their statements. Then the DALPA officers vigorously defended the TA as not cost neutral at the road shows.
I only care that we learn from our mistakes. What was our biggest mistake? Substituting the "judgment" and "expertise" of the MEC administration for our own judgment and logic. Carl Let's just examine some basic facts. In rough justice numbers, Delta pilots generate about $36 billion in revenue every year and cost the company about $2 billion. So when Delta adds flying to mainline they don't expect revenue neutrality they expect you to add revenue on a 18 to 1 basis from your cost. Seriously, is this a surprise to anyone that has had even a week's worth of economics instruction. Even a second grader running a lemonade stands knows she needs to generate more revenue than costs in order to make a profit. Delta Air Lines is a capitalistic organization it is not a charity operation. So in this deal, there were costs shifted from RJ maintenance to pilot salaries and benefits and acquisition of new aircraft. They expect that in the end it is not profit neutral, but that they generate more profits. That is the reason that people invested billions of dollars in Delta Air Lines, they want to make a profit. Right, please someone stop me if I am moving too fast here, because this all seems pretty basic. When Delta buys new aircraft they expect them to be self financing also. Why else would anyone invest billions in new aluminum if they didn't think that the aircraft would generate revenue that would pay the cost of acquisition, the cost of operations, and every other cost, and THEN GENERATE A PROFIT. Once again, these are the most basic of facts, people start capitalistic businesses to make money. So, the idea that pilots will capture all of the revenue they generate is insane. The idea that pilots will capture all of the profits of a company is insane. The idea that management wants to generate a business plan to increase profits should pretty much fall in the DUHHHHHHH category. If along the way we can make a deal that adds a billion dollars into our pockets while allowing Delta to reduce other costs and generate more revenue, that is a no brainer. So, we are fortunate that pilots are not easily fooled by this type of mindless propaganda. By an overwhelming majority, they saw through this type of sham argument and saw that adding mainline flying, adding vacation, adding reserve guarantee pay, increasing pay rates by 20%, increasing retirement income, and numerous other improvements just made sense. In fact, it wasn't even close. So rather than substitute their own good judgement for mindless internet bloviation, they used their intelligence and common sense to make what really is an easy decision. More mainline flying, more pay, more benefits, works for me. |
Originally Posted by Ferd149
(Post 1348961)
Ahhhhhhhhh you young whipper snappers get off my lawn. While cute, a real woman ...............well never mind
Ok, only Scambo and I probably know who she is anyway:cool: http://hilobrow.com/wp-content/uploa...na_rigg_01.jpg Jinks |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:10 PM. |
|
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands