Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Delta (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/)
-   -   Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/36912-any-latest-greatest-about-delta.html)

MrBojangles 03-09-2013 11:54 AM


Originally Posted by Roadkill (Post 1368456)
Bogus analysis. You always spin it the same way, as if instantly the rise and fall of inventory of planes and pilots doesn't exist-- "If it was so bad, we would instantly on this AE see hundreds of displacements!"

WRONG. It WAS bad, and we ARE seeing hundreds of bad things-- you just spin it like they don't exist. What we are seeing is the evaporation of the hiring that would have been required. This is exactly like Safety work... just because there are no visible plane crashes, doesn't mean something huge didn't happen safety wise. What we are seeing is :
1. No hiring, when the company would have been required to hire.
2. Small amount of narrowbody capt spots funded from displaced widebody, when they would have been funded from FOs moving UP instead of wide Capts moving down.
3. Small amount of total vacancies, when they would have required hundreds more instead.
4. Some possible advancement for some in top 50%, who've already been sitting at the top of this pyramid scheme 5 years longer than anyone was ever supposed to, when it was deemed an acceptable pyramid of inequity... ZERO advancement for those at the bottom of the pyramid, who've been sitting there for 14 years or so now.

Here's something sinkr8 or gloopy would write to explain it:

You're like a rich cattleman, looking at a turd a coyote just laid and say, "Well hey, this is nowhere near as smelly and large as it could have been! And very soon this coyote says he'll stop cr pping altogether He's going vegetarian! And come on, he can't really eat my cows!" We look at the same turd as poor land-croppers who can only aspire to owning poultry and say, "Yeah, but that wolf ate all my chickens and rabbits!"

And I guess I should defuse your standard attack/response by saying I love working for Delta, I love coming to work, I have several alternate plans and income sources, I want the best for the airline and investors, I don't want to quit and work somewhere else and shouldn't have to just because I speak up when I see someone twisting truth into a palatable lie, I'm 99% enthused about everything Delta is doing and the other 1% is probably good for the owners, I wear my hat and coat and actually like them a bit, I do everything I can to make folks fly Delta just like you do...

I just disagree on the pilot-count results of the TA. That's it. I don't even necessarily disagree on whether something better was even possible! I'm smart enough to recognize medicine and when I need it... but it absolutely irks me when someone tries to tell me the fish-oil they're feeding me is candy, and my taste-buds are lying to me.

Nice post.

Roadkill 03-09-2013 11:58 AM

Thx ;)
I should probably also add that while I seem to get motivated to hit the old "reply in frenzy" button when sailingfun posts... I do like that he posts here, and I do garner a good bit of info and alternate-viewpoint from his posts.

Sailing seems to have pretty thick skin, so I hope he never decides to "take his ball and go home". He makes for some good reading and debate (usually with folks like Bar that do more research), and this thread is really about entertainment and company happenings awareness for me. Like reality TV, sailing is good entertainment ;)

forgot to bid 03-09-2013 12:53 PM

So even with this AE are we really down 3% in Captains in two years worth of AEs?

Sink r8 03-09-2013 01:38 PM

When you're saying this:


Originally Posted by Roadkill (Post 1368456)

Here's something sinkr8 or gloopy would write to explain it:

[1]You're like a rich cattleman, looking at a turd a coyote just laid and say, "Well hey, this is nowhere near as smelly and large as it could have been! And very soon this coyote says he'll stop cr pping altogether He's going vegetarian! And come on, he can't really eat my cows!" We look at the same turd as poor land-croppers who can only aspire to owning poultry and say, "Yeah, but that wolf ate all my chickens and rabbits!"

[2]And I guess I should defuse your standard attack/response by saying I love working for Delta, I love coming to work, I have several alternate plans and income sources, I want the best for the airline and investors, I don't want to quit and work somewhere else and shouldn't have to just because I speak up when I see someone twisting truth into a palatable lie, I'm 99% enthused about everything Delta is doing and the other 1% is probably good for the owners, I wear my hat and coat and actually like them a bit, I do everything I can to make folks fly Delta just like you do...

[3]I just disagree on the pilot-count results of the TA. That's it. I don't even necessarily disagree on whether something better was even possible! I'm smart enough to recognize medicine and when I need it... but it absolutely irks me when someone tries to tell me the fish-oil they're feeding me is candy, and my taste-buds are lying to me.

...are you suggesting this "Sink r8" would write the first paragraph only, or all three paragraphs?

I love having a ghost writer, but I want to make sure we're on the same page.

Scoop 03-09-2013 01:51 PM


Originally Posted by DeadHead (Post 1368468)
Well Said RoadKill!!!

Sailing has little to no credibility as far as I'm concerned. Practically 80% of what he posts is biased and skewed. You are going to have to excuse me for not popping wood when he boasts about RFPs going out for near term wide body orders.



DH,


I agree with most of your post but disagree with what is bolded - Sailing has more credibility than most on here. I don't always agree with him, for instance I think this displacement Bid blows. I was expecting more on the last bid and was told to wait for this bid. Now we are told to wait for the upcoming bids. Wash, rinse, repeat.


I am sick of the "good stuff" tomorrow crap - it has been going on for almost 12 years. For the guys upset how this last TA was sold it is nothing new, in 2003 we were shown Pilots required with the NW/CAL code-share vs Pilots without. Same crap as with this last TA - maybe it will happen someday - but as CCR says "someday never comes."



Sailing does tend to gloss over and belittle some of venting that many of us do on this forum and paints a lot of issues with a Pro DALPA point of view but so what? He has right to an opinion just as we all do - challenge him on the facts if you disagree with him. Sailing appears "factually" correct more often than not, however I believe a lot of us here, especially the FOs, are sick of being told how good we have it. To me this is more of an opinion and even though I disagree, I separate this from credibility, which I think Sailing has plenty of.


Scoop - Just my 2 Cents

DeadHead 03-09-2013 02:05 PM

[QUOTE=Scoop;1368533]

Originally Posted by DeadHead (Post 1368468)
Well Said RoadKill!!!

Sailing has little to no credibility as far as I'm concerned. Practically 80% of what he posts is biased and skewed. You are going to have to excuse me for not popping wood when he boasts about RFPs going out for near term wide body orders.



DH,


I agree with most of your post but disagree with what is bolded - Sailing has more credibility than most on here. I don't always agree with him, for instance I think this displacement Bid blows. I was expecting more on the last bid and was told to wait for this bid. Now we are told to wait for the upcoming bids. Wash, rinse, repeat.


I am sick of the "good stuff" tomorrow crap - it has been going on for almost 12 years. For the guys upset how this last TA was sold it is nothing new, in 2003 we were shown Pilots required with the NW/CAL code-share vs Pilots without. Same crap as with this last TA - maybe it will happen someday - but as CCR says "someday never comes."



Sailing does tend to gloss over and belittle some of venting that many of us do on this forum and paints a lot of issues with a Pro DALPA point of view but so what? He has right to an opinion just as we all do - challenge him on the facts if you disagree with him. Sailing appears "factually" correct more often than not, however I believe a lot of us here, especially the FOs, are sick of being told how good we have it. To me this is more of an opinion and even though I disagree, I separate this from credibility, which I think Sailing has plenty of.


Scoop - Just my 2 Cents

Scoop,

Your probably right, that was a little harsh of a statement. Some of Sailings' posts have particularly been annoying to me past few days, but I shouldn't discredit him just because I disagree.

Is apologizing permitted in the "latest and greatest" thread?

alfaromeo 03-09-2013 02:15 PM


Originally Posted by Roadkill (Post 1368456)
Bogus analysis. You always spin it the same way, as if instantly the rise and fall of inventory of planes and pilots doesn't exist-- "If it was so bad, we would instantly on this AE see hundreds of displacements!"

WRONG. It WAS bad, and we ARE seeing hundreds of bad things-- you just spin it like they don't exist. What we are seeing is the evaporation of the hiring that would have been required. This is exactly like Safety work... just because there are no visible plane crashes, doesn't mean something huge didn't happen safety wise. What we are seeing is :
1. No hiring, when the company would have been required to hire.
2. Small amount of narrowbody capt spots funded from displaced widebody, when they would have been funded from FOs moving UP instead of wide Capts moving down.
3. Small amount of total vacancies, when they would have required hundreds more instead.
4. Some possible advancement for some in top 50%, who've already been sitting at the top of this pyramid scheme 5 years longer than anyone was ever supposed to, when it was deemed an acceptable pyramid of inequity... ZERO advancement for those at the bottom of the pyramid, who've been sitting there for 14 years or so now.

Here's something sinkr8 or gloopy would write to explain it:

You're like a rich cattleman, looking at a turd a coyote just laid and say, "Well hey, this is nowhere near as smelly and large as it could have been! And very soon this coyote says he'll stop cr pping altogether He's going vegetarian! And come on, he can't really eat my cows!" We look at the same turd as poor land-croppers who can only aspire to owning poultry and say, "Yeah, but that wolf ate all my chickens and rabbits!"

And I guess I should defuse your standard attack/response by saying I love working for Delta, I love coming to work, I have several alternate plans and income sources, I want the best for the airline and investors, I don't want to quit and work somewhere else and shouldn't have to just because I speak up when I see someone twisting truth into a palatable lie, I'm 99% enthused about everything Delta is doing and the other 1% is probably good for the owners, I wear my hat and coat and actually like them a bit, I do everything I can to make folks fly Delta just like you do...

I just disagree on the pilot-count results of the TA. That's it. I don't even necessarily disagree on whether something better was even possible! I'm smart enough to recognize medicine and when I need it... but it absolutely irks me when someone tries to tell me the fish-oil they're feeding me is candy, and my taste-buds are lying to me.

I think your central problem is separating out what was a result of the TA and what wasn't. How many pilots posted their 12 month lookback on hours that were less than 200 for the year? How many guys have been talking about sitting on reserve and not flying for weeks? It certainly shouldn't have been any surprise to you that we were overstaffed by a good amount starting 2012. In January 2012 we had 1430 pilots over the minimum staffing formula. As a comparison, January 2007 we had 300 pilots over the min staffing formula. That overstaffing was before we even started negotiations. That overstaffing had nothing to do with the TA.

Also, it should not be a surprise that the poor economy in Europe that is causing a decrease in Atlantic flying is also not a result of the TA. We had well over a hundred (maybe close to 200) guys come back from military leave, that had nothing to do with the TA. The A-330's were scheduled to go to lie flat mods and that had nothing to do with the TA.

So you are trying to conflate everything negative about your career progression with the ratification of the TA. This is just a false argument.

These are the differences that occurred with the TA;

  1. Early out program that let about 200 pilots out early
  2. Work rule changes, some positive some negative, that cost about 125-150 jobs net
  3. Acceleration of 50 seat removals and addition of 717's (or other small narrow body) at a faster rate than without the TA
In short, the TA made whatever bad stuff you feel, less bad. Without the TA we still were overstaffed, pilots would still come back from Mil Leave, the A-330's would go in for mx, and Europe would still be in recession. Each bid that has come out since the TA has been net positive for pilots moving to higher paying positions and this will be the same. Much of that gain has been because the early out program and the addition of 290 jobs from the 717.


So you can rant all you want. If you want to blame the weather on the TA or SuperStorm Sandy or anything else you can. The problem is separating out independent and dependent events. Most on this forum simply lump all their problems, real or perceived, and then blame the TA for this. That is a false argument.

scambo1 03-09-2013 03:11 PM

vacation slide question

does minus move vacation earlier and plus move it later or vice versa?

hammer189 03-09-2013 03:18 PM


Originally Posted by scambo1 (Post 1368575)
vacation slide question

does minus move vacation earlier and plus move it later or vice versa?

minus is earlier in the month, plus is later.

boog123 03-09-2013 03:24 PM


Originally Posted by NERD (Post 1368446)
51 senior to low 6300s for 717A

152 senior to high 6900s for 717A. Don't think my 2000 hire buddy is gonna make it. At least he will owe me a beer.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:50 PM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands