![]() |
|
I don't think Lee Moak made an endorsement for President in 2012. He essentially said vote on the issues that matter to pilots.
http://www.alpa.org/portals/alpa/pre...12/2012-10.pdf |
Originally Posted by Purple Drank
(Post 1394414)
"Cheap insurance." Yes, it's cheap...because it's worthless.
If you can guarantee the PAC will get the results you imply it will, I'm on board. Until then, I'll stick to lottery tickets. Chances of winning are far higher there. Glad our grandfathers didn't share your attitude. "Unless you guarantee me we will take that beach known as Omaha, I'm not getting off this boat!". Sprechen sie Deutsch? |
Originally Posted by SailorJerry
(Post 1394472)
But if you want to have a meeting where you're briefed by some high power folks in Washington, then how much is it worth to get them to Minot, and how much will it cost to fly them out and put them up at Che Radisson Bismark? Being cost conscious involves the bidding and negotiating process that ACL described. I don't think this has anything to do with what's good for the individual, but what benefit can be gained for the whole. There's obviously something that your MEC leadership feels can be gained for everyone from a meeting in Washington, and not much that could be gained from a meeting in Fargo.
But if you want to think that your current career expectations are solely the result of luck...fine. Jerry, I used Minot and Fargo and tongue-in-cheek examples. I don't expect the MEC to have meetings in either of those cities. However, I do believe if a hotel is good enough for pilots to stay in, then it's good enough for the MEC, as along as that facility meets requirements in terms of conference/meeting rooms. So the MEC is meeting in Washington... We stay at a Hyatt Hotel close to Dulles (and close to Herndon, VA). According to the hotel's website they have over 9,000 square feet of flexible function space, with capacity for 10-600 guests. To "satisfy my curiosity" (Shiz doesn't like "just for fun") I checked their own website for rates on the applicable dates $189/night. Why isn't that good enough? |
Be cause any gov. Official we want to address our MEC doesn't' t have the time in their day to go out to Herndon and back. They are scheduled very tight. I believe this is what ACL was alluding to for this meeting.
|
Originally Posted by NERD
(Post 1394476)
Purple,
Answer a few questions, general answers will do. When were you hired? Year or range of years will do. North or South? Civilian/military or both? Age when hired? Again, a range will do. Not trying to find out who you are, but why so angry? Thanks, Nerd Take out his directness, put a little diplomacy and sugar coating on it and then you begin to see things. TEN |
Originally Posted by Burn Notice
(Post 1394526)
Be cause any gov. Official we want to address our MEC doesn't' t have the time in their day to go out to Herndon and back. They are scheduled very tight. I believe this is what ACL was alluding to for this meeting.
I agree, however, that our reps become more and more removed from the line....just like politicians lose touch with their constituency. As a dues paying member, I want my money spent wisely. I'll trust my leadership to handle that until I no longer trust them. |
|
Originally Posted by Jack Bauer
(Post 1394565)
|
Originally Posted by shiznit
(Post 1394432)
I had a scheduled layover in MIA at the Conrad two weeks ago... Kayak showed that room for $399 and the Sofitel Paris is $617...... When I looked it up "just for fun".
Just observing here, but gotta ask.... so the Kayak price doesn't apply to MEC functions because they negotiate a cheaper, much more beneficial rate with a lot included. But the rate for your purposes is what you see on Kayak? Just listening to both sides, but if someone from the pro-ALPA point of view is going to argue that the numbers don't really mean what they say, and then another pro-ALPA guy adds what you just did, well, it tends to make me think things are being presented in a light that is not accurate, but is done purely to favor your side. Kind of like the claim the union isn't supporting democrats for president since Clinton, but then when someone has access to the actual facts we come to find the truth is different from what we're being told. I'm all for my union, but I would prefer the non-biased version of the truth. |
Originally Posted by buzzpat
(Post 1394556)
From my experience, that's not necessarily true. Politicos spend A LOT of their time away from their offices. Golfing, lunches and Georgetown dinners are more frequent than actually voting on the chamber floor. They are enticed by "goodies," though. So nice hotels and eats are probably more attractive to them.
I agree, however, that our reps become more and more removed from the line....just like politicians lose touch with their constituency. As a dues paying member, I want my money spent wisely. I'll trust my leadership to handle that until I no longer trust them. Gun-control official on Senate failure: ?Bribery isn?t what it once was? « Hot Air So the question is, are politicos voting on principle now? Doubt it. There is a lot of slush in $3-$4T budgets.“Bribery isn’t what it once was,” said an official with one of the major gun-control groups. “The government has no money. Once upon a time you would throw somebody a post office or a research facility in times like this. Frankly, there’s not a lot of leverage.” |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:42 PM. |
|
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands