![]() |
|
Completely off topic, but "The Place Beyond the Pines" is shockingly good if anyone's looking for a movie to see.
|
Originally Posted by biigD
(Post 1405694)
I commute primarily on JetBlue, so I'm no stranger to the comfort of the Airbus. I was talking primarily from a pilot's perspective - I don't like seeing higher paying equipment get replaced with lower paying equipment. More frequency, though. Maybe that makes up for it?
Maybe, But the article did say in order to fly more LAX from JFK they would have cut elsewhere. Sounds like a wash as far as block-time goes. Scoop |
Originally Posted by FmrFreightDog
(Post 1405805)
Completely off topic, but "The Place Beyond the Pines" is shockingly good if anyone's looking for a movie to see.
|
Originally Posted by CAAC ATP
(Post 1405804)
On another note, where are those 321 and widebody announcements? Rick Astley sure didn't have any info.
|
Originally Posted by biigD
(Post 1405729)
I'm not sure that I follow. I'd go to Delta in a heartbeat. That said, the makeup of the two fleets isn't a factor in my decision. I'd choose Delta even if I knew I'd be flying the 717 for the rest of my career.
Hopefully I'll get a shot at proving this to you one day. That is, if you're cool with having a Longhorn onboard. ;) My point is that basing our pay on aircraft size... something which we have zero input into.. is the ultimate definition of stupidity. Fortunately I was hired at the end of a nice wave, so it is not a worry of mine, but if I were young and junior, I would be ****ed off about this propensity to pay based on some retarded "productivity" metric. Best of luck brother. At least there will be a lot of movement in the coming years..... I guess you have to figure out where you will be when the music stops.. and it always does. |
We definitely need more "premium" widebodies, however the 330 has the pax carrying and most of the freight carrying capability of the 777 (freaking stupid it pays the same as the 767-400 and not the 777), just without the ginormous fuel tanks.
However, even if you include the megapoodle, we're still way in the negative compared to UA and the new AA in regard to that sort of lift. |
Originally Posted by tsquare
(Post 1405840)
My point is that basing our pay on aircraft size... something which we have zero input into.. is the ultimate definition of stupidity..
Keep in mind with any new pay system, the overall payroll will have to stay the same. Delta is not going to pay more for it's pilots because we have seniority based pay. You can't magically increase the number of pilots who are getting 777/747 pay. For every pilot that gets more money in a new system, another pilot will be getting less. |
Originally Posted by tsquare
(Post 1405840)
Since bigger HAS to pay more... and if all things were equal, you have to be in the top 500 at DAL to even throw bags on a 777/747 because we have 34 of them... total... So you can look forward to holding those airplanes when you turn 63 or so... of course you will be on reserve, but our reserve system is pretty good... (I am writing this on SC) But I'll bet that on any given day UAL has 50 of 'em welded to the jetways at IAD...
My point is that basing our pay on aircraft size... something which we have zero input into.. is the ultimate definition of stupidity. Fortunately I was hired at the end of a nice wave, so it is not a worry of mine, but if I were young and junior, I would be ****ed off about this propensity to pay based on some retarded "productivity" metric. Best of luck brother. At least there will be a lot of movement in the coming years..... I guess you have to figure out where you will be when the music stops.. and it always does. Btw, there was a rumor more seats are coming to the 90s? |
Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
(Post 1405433)
...Anyone think of the Atlanta Aquarium when they saw that interior?
Wonder if that scheme makes older people have to pee, or has everyone forgotten. https://encrypted-tbn1.gstatic.com/i...Ljtd6lXheLsI-s |
Originally Posted by tsquare
(Post 1405840)
Since bigger HAS to pay more... and if all things were equal, you have to be in the top 500 at DAL to even throw bags on a 777/747 because we have 34 of them... total... So you can look forward to holding those airplanes when you turn 63 or so... of course you will be on reserve, but our reserve system is pretty good... (I am writing this on SC) But I'll bet that on any given day UAL has 50 of 'em welded to the jetways at IAD...
My point is that basing our pay on aircraft size... something which we have zero input into.. is the ultimate definition of stupidity. Fortunately I was hired at the end of a nice wave, so it is not a worry of mine, but if I were young and junior, I would be ****ed off about this propensity to pay based on some retarded "productivity" metric. Best of luck brother. At least there will be a lot of movement in the coming years..... I guess you have to figure out where you will be when the music stops.. and it always does. I'll agree, we do need more 777s.:D UAL has combined their pay in a banded system 747, 777, 787, 764. Not exactly a seniority based system, but probably close. However, if all you want to do is fly narrowbodies for max pay, your arch-nemesis kitty sacrificers comes to mind. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:41 PM. |
|
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands