![]() |
|
Originally Posted by shiznit
(Post 1468013)
I think the small jet scope was pretty decent considering your metric.... red font is mine...
The big win was the international and JV language, which was all but non-existent in the pervious PWA...(and was diluted to a 3 year lookback and remains to be seen whether it will be enforced). How much stronger is our hand WITH C2012 JV language now that the Virgin Atlantic deal is imminent (Is it just me or didn't management walk away from negotiations on VA language just last week?)!? I like your style, but have you begun to grow a mustache? red font mine |
Originally Posted by scambo1
(Post 1468035)
Shiz;
I like your style, but have you begun to grow a mustache? red font mine second part: Not a chance! I have it on pretty solid info that the MEC will absolutely enforce the AFKLAZ JV language... But it's not a violation until it's a violation. The Company has the chance to fix it: chances are slim to none! You'll have to call your rep, but I am not aware of the Company "walking away" from any Virgin Atl. negotiations |
Originally Posted by shiznit
(Post 1468010)
AMR 12yr rates as of 1/1/15. . . DAL 12yr CA
Group 1 CA $118.63 . . . . . 717 . . 195.19 Group 2 CA $174.46 . . . 88/32/73 . 205.56/209.31/216.92 Group 3 CA $188.06 . . . . 757/767 . 226.21 Group 4 CA $221.63 . . . . 33/78/777 . 255.28/258.90/270.25 AMR 12yr rates . 1/1/16 . . DAL CA 12yr 1/1/15 Group 1 CA $138.79 . . . . . . 717 . . 195.19 Group 2 CA $204.11 . . . . 88/32/73 . 205.56/209.31/216.92 Group 3 CA $220.04 . . . . 757/767 . 226.21 Group 4 CA $259.31 . . . . 33/78/777 . 255.28/258.90/270.25 Gp 1 All aircraft less than 118 seats Gp 2 MD80, all 319/20/21 and 737 variants Gp 3 757/762/763/A300 Gp 4 764/787/777/A330/A350 |
Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
(Post 1468072)
By passing our 2015 rates, I meant at the end of their contract.
Other unions piggy backing on ALPA again.... |
Originally Posted by Wasatch Phantom
(Post 1468002)
Timbo, Shiz and PG thanks for your responses to my question. I was hoping Bar, FTB and GeorgeTG would weigh-in, but they didn't.
Your post was too forward looking for there to be any data to support a conclusion one way, or the other. I still maintain that the 717 is an interim solution if the C Series isn't priced out of the market. The C Series is a leap nearly as significant as the 787 is. Eventually every airline will have some version of a 787. Boeing priced the 787 aggressively and now has the problem of needing to sell about 1,300 of them before they see the first dime of profit. Bombardier does not have a 737/767-Tanker & military sale cash cow to milk while it awaits a return on it's investment. Pratt, for their part, is such a believer in their GTF that they're spinning up to produce these in huge numbers. They think they'll eventually get the NB sales lead from GE. Unfortunately, outsourcing is an economic issue. We don't know what management will pay, or what price our MEC might accept, to outsource members' jobs. I keep hoping we might return to the days when alter ego was properly perceived as the very existential threat that it is to labor. We will not have a decisive victory until we make a moral stand ... that no Delta pilot's job gets sold. Until then, I don't think anyone can make an accurate guess where this goes. |
|
Originally Posted by shiznit
(Post 1468099)
Gotcha... Just wanted to show that the AA rates get a "me too" average at DOS+36 and then 2%/yr after that (can't remember if they get to keep averaging in the next years until amendable).
Other unions piggy backing on ALPA again.... Also to be fair, keep in mind that AA contract was a bankruptcy concessionary contract. They got raises in bankruptcy. Have pride, but not blind pride. Blind pride leads to the DPA representing DL pilots. |
Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
(Post 1468072)
By passing our 2015 rates, I meant at the end of their contract.
|
Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
(Post 1468120)
Have pride, but not blind pride. Blind pride leads to the DPA representing DL pilots.
Blind LGBT Pride International Talk about not knowing what hit you .... |
Originally Posted by shiznit
(Post 1468064)
Hahaha. First part: thanks!
second part: Not a chance! I have it on pretty solid info that the MEC will absolutely enforce the AFKLAZ JV language... But it's not a violation until it's a violation. The Company has the chance to fix it: chances are slim to none! You'll have to call your rep, but I am not aware of the Company "walking away" from any Virgin Atl. negotiations I think it will be very telling on how our MEC plans on handling the TA/JV measurement period ending next march. I guess it's not really non compliance until we actually reach the end of the measurement window and look back over the past 3 years. The writing is on the wall though, and while I don't want to be a pessimist, I am still cautiously optimistic that our section 1 provisions will create real growth and expansion for Delta pilots under a push to recede the ratios back into compliance. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:50 PM. |
|
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands