![]() |
|
Originally Posted by iaflyer
(Post 1472798)
Some strong words coming out of Atlanta from Kingsley Roberts about C2015, ALPA and DPA.
It's a long letter, I won't post the whole thing here - everyone will see a copy anyway, but this was about the strongest line: "Let’s be clear, DPA’s efforts are a blueprint of the USAPA disaster and we cannot afford to repeat the US Airways fiasco here. " Thoughts? I think DPA has had it's chance - it's been three years. Rather than be divisive going into C2015, I think TC and others should man up and either say they have the cards for an election or they don't. If they haven't been able to get the cards yet, they probably aren't going to. Going into C2015 with DPA hanging over everyone's head will only make us weaker, divide us when we should be strong, and in the eyes of the company, it makes us look weak and we might end up with a worse contract because of it. Yes, there are the DPA folks who say if we only could get rid of ALPA we could have an even better contract - but if DPA doesn't have enough cards to call for an election, then they don't have the numbers and it's not going to happen. Sorry - but in that case the pilots have spoken. |
Originally Posted by iaflyer
(Post 1472920)
I'm only quote myself to start the conversation...
I think DPA has had it's chance - it's been three years. Rather than be divisive going into C2015, I think TC and others should man up and either say they have the cards for an election or they don't. If they haven't been able to get the cards yet, they probably aren't going to. Going into C2015 with DPA hanging over everyone's head will only make us weaker, divide us when we should be strong, and in the eyes of the company, it makes us look weak and we might end up with a worse contract because of it. In 2012, we negotiated a contract that is industry leading in many ways, and we completed it well ahead of the amendable date, with sizable gains that not only benefit our pilot group, but that have raised the bar for other pilot groups throughout the industry. |
Potential Good News
From the DALPA boards:
Two positive threads. First talk about more hiring than originally planned. Second talk of the WB order being announced with an interim order of 10 777's and 30 737-900's OR 10 330's and 30 321's (no split order.) Waiting for BOD approval. Should be announced by the end of August (tomorrow?) As always - Good news tomorrow :) Scoop |
the announcement on the order was supposed to be last week! just like the hiring was supposed to be a few years ago.
|
Originally Posted by MrBojangles
(Post 1472931)
the announcement on the order was supposed to be last week! just like the hiring was supposed to be a few years ago.
|
Originally Posted by Scoop
(Post 1472929)
From the DALPA boards:
Two positive threads. First talk about more hiring than originally planned. Second talk of the WB order being announced with an interim order of 10 777's and 30 737-900's OR 10 330's and 30 321's (no split order.) Waiting for BOD approval. Should be announced by the end of August (tomorrow?) As always - Good news tomorrow :) Scoop |
Originally Posted by Jack Bauer
(Post 1472953)
Curiosity question: Anybody here flown both the 777 and A330? From a pilot perspective, would you rather have 10 777's or A330's and why?
Of course the 777, it pays more!!!!!:eek: |
Originally Posted by shiznit
(Post 1472957)
This one's for you tsquare!!!!:p
Of course the 777, it pays more!!!!!:eek: |
Originally Posted by Dorfman
(Post 1472805)
Just go read the the pro DPA people on the dALPA board and here. They sling more mud than a congressional candidate. Don't kid yourself. There is plenty of mud-slinging from both sides. |
Originally Posted by Jack Bauer
(Post 1472953)
Curiosity question: Anybody here flown both the 777 and A330? From a pilot perspective, would you rather have 10 777's or A330's and why?
The 777LR or 300 are pretty amazing machines. The LR can connect any two cities on the planet, carry all the people and all the cargo. The -300 has (I think) two more pallet positions than the pax configured 747-400, longer range and comparable pax with two engine economics. They are different missions and both do their design mission well. In the case of the LR, extremely well. Additionally, I think the manning is different in the categories due to 3 man or 4 man crews. In my case, I'd rather have more 777s, but I have nothing against the airbus. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:04 AM. |
|
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands