![]() |
|
Originally Posted by sailingfun
(Post 1641994)
The company sustained hiring a 100 pilots a month with fewer sims in the past. They will do fine and contract where needed. No help from us required.
Sailing, I too was thinking about that. We did 100 month as stand alone DAL before the merger. But I was in the room when SD put out that we can train 60 month indefinitely and surge well above that at times for close to 1000 year. So what changed since 97-2001? The only thing that quickly jumps to mind is no more Engineers. I imagine that 85-90% of new hires going to SO probably made things easier - more classroom time and less total time in the box. Other than that most things that changed should make trainer quicker - more CD self study etc. FWIW - I think that training capacity will not be an issue and 100% agree - no help from us required. Scoop |
Originally Posted by Check Essential
(Post 1642152)
By the way --
Anderson's wife has also been granted stock and options. She just sold some 5 days ago. From the SEC: SEC FORM 4 |
Originally Posted by gzsg
(Post 1642143)
So now you are saying I made up Ken Rogers email response to me?
Let's put $10,000 on a bet and if I made it up I will write a check to the charity of your choice. If Ken confirms and shows you his email you will write a.$10,000 check to the charity of my choice. Put your money where your mouth is. BTW I still believe in Santa. When management holds a large number in stock and options I think it causes them to focus to much on near term stock value and not enough on long term strategic planning. I see that in our current fleet plan. |
Originally Posted by Timbo
(Post 1642154)
Shoes must be on sale at Nordstroms. :rolleyes:
Although I doubt she will have to go barefoot. I think these big money guys do this for tax reasons. They get the full value of the shares as a deduction but they only counted the original grant price as their income. Sweet deal. |
Originally Posted by Scoop
(Post 1642153)
Sailing,
I too was thinking about that. We did 100 month as stand alone DAL before the merger. But I was in the room when SD put out that we can train 60 month indefinitely and surge well above that at times for close to 1000 year. So what changed since 97-2001? The only thing that quickly jumps to mind is no more Engineers. I imagine that 85-90% of new hires going to SO probably made things easier - more classroom time and less total time in the box. Other than that most things that changed should make trainer quicker - more CD self study etc. FWIW - I think that training capacity will not be an issue and 100% agree - no help from us required. Scoop Now, how many sims do we have for each fleet? I don't know. But in addition to new hires, you also have to do recurrent training in those sims, plus the guys swapping seats. So what is the total number of sims in each fleet, vs. the amount of upgrade training, plus recurrent, plus new hires? And is the training footprint still about 8 sim periods for an initial? |
Originally Posted by Check Essential
(Post 1642160)
Just to be fair... it looks like the shares she "disposed of" were donated to charities.
Although I doubt she will have to go barefoot. I think these big money guys do this for tax reasons. They get the full value of the shares as a deduction but they only counted the original grant price as their income. Sweet deal. |
Originally Posted by Scoop
(Post 1642153)
Sailing,
I too was thinking about that. We did 100 month as stand alone DAL before the merger. But I was in the room when SD put out that we can train 60 month indefinitely and surge well above that at times for close to 1000 year. So what changed since 97-2001? The only thing that quickly jumps to mind is no more Engineers. I imagine that 85-90% of new hires going to SO probably made things easier - more classroom time and less total time in the box. Other than that most things that changed should make trainer quicker - more CD self study etc. FWIW - I think that training capacity will not be an issue and 100% agree - no help from us required. Scoop |
Originally Posted by gzsg
(Post 1642013)
Excellent post! You said it all.
Richard has over 2.7 millions shares and counting. Ken Rogers can give you the exact number. I do believe if you are going to start using stock etc in a compensation comparison, one needs to be consistent and willing to accept it themselves. |
Originally Posted by Check Essential
(Post 1642160)
Just to be fair... it looks like the shares she "disposed of" were donated to charities.
Although I doubt she will have to go barefoot. I think these big money guys do this for tax reasons. They get the full value of the shares as a deduction but they only counted the original grant price as their income. Sweet deal.
Originally Posted by RonRicco
(Post 1642173)
I get that a large portion of the CEO's compensation is based on stock and options. Are you advocating that a large portion of our compensation package be made of "at risk" dollars? I have heard quite a few pilots advocate just that, others want straight pay in their check.
I do believe if you are going to start using stock etc in a compensation comparison, one needs to be consistent and willing to accept it themselves. I'd take a from of compensatory stock grants like they get in lieu of pay in the next contract. As long as they were non restricted. Maybe that $2 billion in stock buyback can be transferred to us at the buyback rates. :) |
Originally Posted by LivingTheDream
(Post 1642097)
Remember, just APD one of the days to drop the entire trip. Then yes, you must WS back up to the 75hr GS trigger to get paid for the entire GS.
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:03 PM. |
|
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands