Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2012
Posts: 336
What I hear the split duty is 6 hours between flights but reducible. Can not be rerouted into. Call or email your rep. The ADG is good. Split line is a no for me.
Last edited by dc10guy; 05-19-2014 at 04:36 PM.
I won't go that far. Some people legitimately do like them, and there can be a niche for them if appropriately restricted. I really don't like the 30 hour layovers and the upturn of sleep cycle involved in converting to the early early morning with a very long day at the end of the 30 hours.
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2014
Posts: 463
I'm just telling you what the FAA documented as being the rationale for the 10 hour minimum rest with 8 hour uninterrupted sleep opportunity. CDO's are a way of getting around the intent of that. Almost nobody that does a CDO sleeps any significant amount during the day. They count on the CDO to provide whatever sleep they are going to get.
I don't care what your sleep habits are... the sleep science the FAA used in creating 117 says 8 hours is the standard. The typical pilot doing a CDO is getting FAR less than that and operating a flight at the end of a 24 hour period on maybe 3 or 4 hours of sleep during that period. If your experience (and common sense) doesn't tell you that's UNSAFE, then I can't help you.
I don't care what your sleep habits are... the sleep science the FAA used in creating 117 says 8 hours is the standard. The typical pilot doing a CDO is getting FAR less than that and operating a flight at the end of a 24 hour period on maybe 3 or 4 hours of sleep during that period. If your experience (and common sense) doesn't tell you that's UNSAFE, then I can't help you.
Increased compensation needs to come in other ways (and the company can afford it), not at the cost of safety and health. We have all seen the pilot who died years before his time. Pressurizing/depressurizing, time zone changes/jetlag, radiation, etc. is already hammering our health. Let's not be stupid and move toward regional rules and reducing the profession to zombies grabbing for money.
Sorry for the topic change but I cannot find any reference to jury duty in the PWA. I already have a trip on the days that I have been summoned, what happens to that trip?
Shiz, to me this is kind of like the CDO thing. If we're both on the 88 and we do LGA-PWM. Nah, IAH-KILE (look it up for old Coex nightmare).
You fly in tonight get there at 11, I take the flight out in the morning at 6. At 3am, how many FOs does DAL have at the hotel (LaQuinta Inn but not the good one, an old concrete wall one)? 2.
Do a CDO and how many FOs are there at 3am? 1.
Now we could have 3 FOs that bid all of these ILE CDOs, do 10 each. If they could only do 13.5 hour 3-days with 30 hour layovers and there were 2 crews per night, I'm guessing around 5-6 pilots could bid that (and only that) per month and cover it.
I don't know, I'll wait and see the language but I can kind of see where CDOs and augmented crews could open the gate for reduced need for pilots right at the moment they're realizing they don't have enough.
If I put a management hat on fewer pilots is a good thing. Turns are easier to staff and coordinate than overnights. Seems like they could be more productive with a given amount of pilots and that seems to be the trend.
But liek the 1.56 ratio the devil is in the details to me.
And fwiw... it'll pass. If it went to MEMRAT with a seal of approval it will pass.
You fly in tonight get there at 11, I take the flight out in the morning at 6. At 3am, how many FOs does DAL have at the hotel (LaQuinta Inn but not the good one, an old concrete wall one)? 2.
Do a CDO and how many FOs are there at 3am? 1.
Now we could have 3 FOs that bid all of these ILE CDOs, do 10 each. If they could only do 13.5 hour 3-days with 30 hour layovers and there were 2 crews per night, I'm guessing around 5-6 pilots could bid that (and only that) per month and cover it.
I don't know, I'll wait and see the language but I can kind of see where CDOs and augmented crews could open the gate for reduced need for pilots right at the moment they're realizing they don't have enough.
If I put a management hat on fewer pilots is a good thing. Turns are easier to staff and coordinate than overnights. Seems like they could be more productive with a given amount of pilots and that seems to be the trend.
But liek the 1.56 ratio the devil is in the details to me.
And fwiw... it'll pass. If it went to MEMRAT with a seal of approval it will pass.
WRT the CDO issue...I don't care as much how many pilots are laying over, as how much credit pilots are accumulating. With only two short legs and a 8-11 hour duty period, the nighttime rig will cause higher credit per "two legs" that can't be eaten up with block time elsewhere in the rotation.
Also, these will be very late show- very early release 4 day rotations with only three duty periods that will pay 22:30 (if they indeed are 7:30 each). That is actually still higher than 5:15/day ADG!
I beleive there will be a significant increase in manning needed due to ADG in general, with all reserves getting 5:15 each day instead of on the end of month "lookback" that we have presently.
Add that with the ADG applying to all the late show and 30 hour layovers that are too long for a CDO, the 18:00 4 days and 13:30 3 days will help a number of lineholders to build a full month of flying with one or two less days of work per month. Those "less days of work" will need to still be flown, so it will require more pilots in category to fly the same schedule.
I think the math on domestic augmentation has shown it likely won't necessarily decrease staffing, but I'm sure there will be reps who ask about that in detail at the meeting.
My money is definitely on the staffing formula going UP rather than DOWN if we ratify this LOA.
I wonder if the net result of the staffing will offset or more than offset the 100-150 pilot "savings" supposedly allowed from C2012?
I wonder what the value of ADG would mean to the Delta pilot payroll as a yearly percentage?
<--- Only sorta waiting patiently for details.
(oh, and I agree with ftb that this will pass with or without memrat)
Hey TIMBO
I sailed with one of your cat buddies (Matt McD) this weekend. We gotta get you out with us one of these days. I would love to come down to Kelly for your regatta, but somebody gotta pay the rent. Sail fast....
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Posts: 4,922
There's a jury duty form online. You need to let the company know ASAP. They will drop as little of your trip as possible so you can make jury duty (could be whole trip). You will be paid for the dropped part of your trip. If you do not let the company know in a timely manner, it will be dropped without pay (yes this has happened). Jury duty is referenced in section 12 of the PWA.
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2014
Posts: 463
I beleive there will be a significant increase in manning needed due to ADG in general, with all reserves getting 5:15 each day instead of on the end of month "lookback" that we have presently.
.....Those "less days of work" will need to still be flown, so it will require more pilots in category to fly the same schedule.
I think the math on domestic augmentation has shown it likely won't necessarily decrease staffing, but I'm sure there will be reps who ask about that in detail at the meeting.
My money is definitely on the staffing formula going UP rather than DOWN if we ratify this LOA.
I wonder if the net result of the staffing will offset or more than offset the 100-150 pilot "savings" supposedly allowed from C2012?
.....Those "less days of work" will need to still be flown, so it will require more pilots in category to fly the same schedule.
I think the math on domestic augmentation has shown it likely won't necessarily decrease staffing, but I'm sure there will be reps who ask about that in detail at the meeting.
My money is definitely on the staffing formula going UP rather than DOWN if we ratify this LOA.
I wonder if the net result of the staffing will offset or more than offset the 100-150 pilot "savings" supposedly allowed from C2012?
I don't believe it really exists. It is merely cocaine to placate the masses. (us)
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post