Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? >

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Search

Notices

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-25-2014 | 12:39 PM
  #161101  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 20,876
Likes: 193
Default

Originally Posted by BigLebowski
I understand. But I work at Delta already.
If you want to live in SLC long term I would head out there now. Interest rates are low and housing is going up. Get settled and commute until you can hold SLC. DTW has a lot of longer trips and if can snag some SLC layovers it can take some sting out of the commute. I would go for the bus or 737 so out of base pickups are a option.
Old 06-25-2014 | 12:50 PM
  #161102  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 340
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by boog123
Anyone been released by scheduling for IOE before? I know they won't do it before 1900 the day before, but do they call you? You call them? LCP call you? Thanks
Scheduling calls.
Old 06-25-2014 | 02:31 PM
  #161103  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 272
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by BigLebowski
Can anyone provide a sound projection on what the future holds for Delta in SLC? I tried the search function, and came up empty.

FNG here, wanting to move out to where there are some mountains. SEA and LAX are options too. But, SLC is cheaper.

Thanks in advance.
As a SLC guy I would say if you like being jr and staying junior come on over. I have been at Delta 14 years and am still in the bottom 50% on the 737. I have moved backward 21% in the category over the last 3 years and have never moved up a single number in any bid since spring of 2011. Most Jr capt in the base is a 5600ish. It looks like they are going to reduce the 767 FO's in SLC from 96 to 76 this November according to the staffing report, so I would imagine most of those guys will displace into the 73 and 320. For me I would expect upgrade to capt to be 7-10 years longer in SLC than NY, DTW or ATL. Depending on when you were hired that number could be reduced by a few years. I just flew with a capt who said that the average age capt in the 73 in SLC was 54 1/2 but I don't have any idea if that is true. Just recently the I was talking to regional chief pilot and he said he had been told that SLC was currently the right size and to not expect any future growth. Of course who knows, things change daily. So with all that said it is a choice to live out west, mountains vs money and seniority.
Old 06-25-2014 | 02:33 PM
  #161104  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 3,108
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun
SWA's overall financial position compared to Delta is outstanding. They don't have any off the books debt or pension obligations. Whatever choices in fleets or growth they make could be sustained for a long long time.
SWA non pilot costs are through the roof since they never went through Chapter 11.

IMO their nightmare has begun. Simply look at their on time performance, 10% behind us.

I believe they will have a long slow descent to bankruptcy that will take a decade.
Old 06-25-2014 | 02:38 PM
  #161105  
tsquare's Avatar
No longer cares
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 12,109
Likes: 0
From: 767er Captain
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun
SWA's overall financial position compared to Delta is outstanding. They don't have any off the books debt or pension obligations. Whatever choices in fleets or growth they make could be sustained for a long long time.
Originally Posted by gzsg
SWA non pilot costs are through the roof since they never went through Chapter 11.
IMO their nightmare has begun. Simply look at their on time performance, 10% behind us.
I believe they will have a long slow descent to bankruptcy that will take a decade.

That is true, and they have an ace in the hole.... bag fees. An instantaneous injection of huge amounts of cash to the bottom line. But, their growth potential vis-a-vis the big 3 is extremely limited. That is what is very interesting to me as an investor because you invest in business based on growth and risk (and growth potential). LUV has little risk overall because of that balance sheet, but their growth (potential) is anemic. the big 3 on the other hand, while having mountains of debt presently, are eating into that debt aggressively, and we all know how DAL will have it to $7B this year and $5B in 2016. And LUV's multiple is higher than DAL, so a basic examination of that would tell you that people are paying up to own LUV stock. Why I wonder? Is it the potential for the bag fees and that injection of cash flow? I have even thought about buying some deep in the money calls, but I just can't seem to pull the trigger on that (I did on AAL though. ) It is interesting to say the least..... and I do not think BK is anywhere on their horizon.
Old 06-25-2014 | 02:40 PM
  #161106  
tsquare's Avatar
No longer cares
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 12,109
Likes: 0
From: 767er Captain
Default

Originally Posted by Purple Drank
Maybe SWA can get 737 overhead panels installed on the C-series.

Just saw a SWA airplane with a "bags fly free" decal in place...so for the foreseeable future they're leaving hundreds of millions on the table.
Yes they are... but.... I think they believe they know that their clientele will bug out if they start charging those bag fees. I am sure it is a balancing act that keeps their head shed up at night. And if they do it, how do they unwind it?

Last edited by tsquare; 06-25-2014 at 03:04 PM.
Old 06-25-2014 | 02:41 PM
  #161107  
tsquare's Avatar
No longer cares
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 12,109
Likes: 0
From: 767er Captain
Default

Originally Posted by BigLebowski
Can anyone provide a sound projection on what the future holds for Delta in SLC? I tried the search function, and came up empty.

FNG here, wanting to move out to where there are some mountains. SEA and LAX are options too. But, SLC is cheaper.

Thanks in advance.
I would think it is safe since we are about to spend a boatload of $$$ on a new terminal.
Old 06-25-2014 | 02:55 PM
  #161108  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 467
Likes: 0
From: SLC ERB
Default

Originally Posted by daldude
It looks like they are going to reduce the 767 FO's in SLC from 96 to 76 this November according to the staffing report, so I would imagine most of those guys will displace into the 73 and 320.
Which is interesting since there are 15 7ERB's scheduled to convert INTO SLC between September and November. If they're going to displace down to 76, they'd better get cracking.

BTW the projected SLC 7erb category list for DECEMBER shows a count of 93.


ETA - if you were trying to spread doom and gloom about SLC in order to keep senior people from bidding in then you're right, SLC is in a downward death spiral Stay away, everyone!
Old 06-25-2014 | 03:04 PM
  #161109  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 758
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by daldude
As a SLC guy I would say if you like being jr and staying junior come on over. I have been at Delta 14 years and am still in the bottom 50% on the 737. I have moved backward 21% in the category over the last 3 years and have never moved up a single number in any bid since spring of 2011. Most Jr capt in the base is a 5600ish. It looks like they are going to reduce the 767 FO's in SLC from 96 to 76 this November according to the staffing report, so I would imagine most of those guys will displace into the 73 and 320. For me I would expect upgrade to capt to be 7-10 years longer in SLC than NY, DTW or ATL. Depending on when you were hired that number could be reduced by a few years. I just flew with a capt who said that the average age capt in the 73 in SLC was 54 1/2 but I don't have any idea if that is true. Just recently the I was talking to regional chief pilot and he said he had been told that SLC was currently the right size and to not expect any future growth. Of course who knows, things change daily. So with all that said it is a choice to live out west, mountains vs money and seniority.
The staffing report is the minimum required not the actual staffing numbers.
Old 06-25-2014 | 03:12 PM
  #161110  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 2,058
Likes: 2
From: Capt
Default

OK, first, apologize in advance if I'm not getting this stuff.

REG in June, RES in July. Last 5 days off of June, first 10 of July

If I GS a trip that has SPILL in it, Double time in June, single pay over reserve guarantee in June with PB days, correct? (I do understand the trip with trip at the end thing)

Now, If I WS a Spill trip, it's single pay for June, but what happens to pay and the days off that I would be now working on for July? Example: 9 day Asia, 3 days in June (17:00), 6 days in July (40:00) working on 6 normal days off.

Thanks
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
On Autopilot
Regional
22617
11-05-2021 07:03 AM
AeroCrewSolut
Delta
153
08-14-2018 12:18 PM
Bill Lumberg
Major
71
06-13-2012 08:36 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices