|
Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
(Post 698122)
Slowplay,
So your intent and credibility is 100% infallable to any bias? |
Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
(Post 698122)
Slowplay,
So your intent and credibility is 100% infallable to any bias? What I posted above is factually correct. If you're interested still, go to the "alpawatch" website. Read their historical record. You'll see while they put out placebo rhetoric on how they'd like things to be, in the end they served to divide. In fact they reveled in that. Of course I'm subject to bias. But I'll challenge you to point out where I've asserted something factually incorrect. Still, my intent and credibility is worth what you pay for it...;) You can always put me on your ignore list. |
Originally Posted by slowplay
(Post 698118)
Without adding my personal opinion...you mean the guy that thinks DOH is the only "fair" way to do a merger? And who advocated such on the DALPA forum (wife is furloughed USAirways). His posts would be an interesting historical reference if we ever merged with, say, Alaska.
As to the answers that got this thread moving again, note that the questions above reference "Council 20". That's DTW, not SLC. My guess is that it was an "alpawatch" questionnaire. Looking at their website and seeing the misinformation they produced during the merger doesn't give me any warm fuzzies about their intent or credibility. I don't mean to rehash merger stuff that is rightfully behind us. The point is that "alpawatch" isn't accountable to anyone, and have in the past worked to divide. I will agree that during the SLI they were not unbiased at all. If you do a search of their election archives, as I have, the majority of their stuff us unbiased.They just print the stuff and that is it. No input or perspective. As for the guy in question. I give him a ton of credit, he has listened to advice, reason and logic and changed his views on may issues. That is impressive whether you agree with his point of view or not. He takes input. I have seen it first hand. |
Originally Posted by acl65pilot
(Post 698129)
Slow;
As for the guy in question. I give him a ton of credit, he has listened to advice, reason and logic and changed his views on may issues. That is impressive whether you agree with his point of view or not. He takes input. I have seen it first hand. |
Originally Posted by slowplay
(Post 698118)
Without adding my personal opinion...you mean the guy that thinks DOH is the only "fair" way to do a merger? And who advocated such on the DALPA forum (wife is furloughed USAirways). His posts would be an interesting historical reference if we ever merged with, say, Alaska.
2. Interesting that CS advocated DOH for USAirways.....I suspect that is because his wife is furloughed from USAirways...He wouldn't advocate DOH for anyone with Delta I bet.... |
Originally Posted by Jack Bauer
(Post 697833)
Anybody know/or have flown with him? It would be nice if he was being honest as I agree with most of what he says. Is he the real deal? Thoughts about what he says? These upcoming elections are crucial and no vote should be waisted.
|
Originally Posted by acl65pilot
(Post 698099)
You read the blast mail that we sent out?
|
Originally Posted by acl65pilot
(Post 698115)
You are not in Council 44.
|
Originally Posted by DLpilot
(Post 698238)
I wish it had been sent out sooner. I think we should have gotten that information before the voting began.
If these answers sway your vote, log on and change it. The goal was to have each candidates answers side by side so you the pilots could make the best decision for yourself. We want what is best for this council, even if that means one does not get elected. |
Originally Posted by KC10 FATboy
(Post 698241)
But I wanna be ...
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:43 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands