|
|
Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
(Post 1695492)
That's a tremendous amount of capacity loss without a replacement. I wonder what the "company wide update" for asia strategy will be...
|
Originally Posted by scambo1
(Post 1695510)
It's tough to tell if they added 777 FOs, but if they did without adding captains, it means more 3 man stuff...not so good. Parking 744s early lends credence to the 10 used 777-300s rumor. One can hope.
I guess bainite counted, but idk if he counted the guys that bid off. Plus, I didn't think they were supposed to add ANY 777 FO's in DTW. (Like they weren't going to backfill). It look's like they added 14? :confused: |
How are you guys seeing the results? Where are they posted.
Scoop |
Originally Posted by johnso29
(Post 1695530)
I can think of a pretty quick way to pick that capacity right up. I don't think any of us are going to like it though. :(
|
Originally Posted by Scoop
(Post 1695532)
How are you guys seeing the results? Where are they posted.
Scoop |
Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
(Post 1695534)
Exactly. Top end scope may be coming under fire again here... And how is the transpac LOA affected by this?
The LOA is good. Protecting 85% of our Pacific flying is a big win. The LOA is good. Protecting 85% of our Pacific flying is a big win. The LOA is good. Protecting 85% of our Pacific flying is a big win. |
|
Originally Posted by Pro Fessional
(Post 1695489)
Four 747s being retired this year.
Originally Posted by Check Essential
(Post 1695538)
Just keep chanting:
The LOA is good. Protecting 85% of our Pacific flying is a big win. The LOA is good. Protecting 85% of our Pacific flying is a big win. The LOA is good. Protecting 85% of our Pacific flying is a big win. |
Originally Posted by Check Essential
(Post 1695538)
Just keep chanting:
The LOA is good. Protecting 85% of our Pacific flying is a big win. The LOA is good. Protecting 85% of our Pacific flying is a big win. The LOA is good. Protecting 85% of our Pacific flying is a big win. I agree this AE was a tempest in a teapot. More big metal retiring - for the most part continued stagnation. What a disappointment. I really hope ALPA is aggressive on the JV screw-job. OBTW - Whoever agreed to a three year measurement window with a one year ignore (I mean cure) period should be voted out of office. Scoop :cool: |
Originally Posted by Scoop
(Post 1695545)
I agree this AE was a tempest in a teapot. More big metal retiring - for the most part continued stagnation. What a disappointment.
I really hope ALPA is aggressive on the JV screw-job. OBTW - Whoever agreed to a three year measurement window with a one year ignore (I mean cure) period should be voted out of office. Scoop :cool: |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:47 PM. |
|
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands