Originally Posted by RockyMtMadDog (Post 700172)

Actually, you are missing my point. I suggested that whichever candidate DID have access to the survey to e-mail it out could have changed his answers based on the answers of others (whereas the others did not have that chance), not that he changed the other's answers. And even then, I'm not suggesting that he did that, only that he placed himself in a position where that possibility exists.

So put my concerns to bed. You helped write the survey. I like your thoughts on investing and even plan to sign up for the next course, but as a survey author...well I like your thoughts on investing.

So since you did not have the authority to send it out, who did? That's all I am asking. Every candidate I have talked to so far denies that he did. I do not understand why it's such a secret. And I don't see the point of tradng one group that likes to keep secrets for another that also does (or simply can't tell the truth). Maybe I am an idealist.

Originally Posted by tsquare (Post 699997)

I go there occasionally, and it's more dull than listening to paint dry...

Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp (Post 700203)

Quit b!tching about it and write an email to them. If it were doctored, don't you think the candidates that participated would be up in storm about it?

This opens up the possibility that all union emails are doctored. Section 8 everyone.

Originally Posted by RockyMtMadDog (Post 700205)

But if we all went there in force . . . :D

Originally Posted by RockyMtMadDog (Post 700206)

Quit B!iching about what I choose to b!tch about and read my post again clamp-dude. Really slowly this time. Or else stop multi-tasking when you do. It's not working for you.

Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp (Post 700217)

You want a name on an anonymous forum. That's something that needs to be taken up in email or PM.

Originally Posted by tsquare (Post 700200)

Bama's going DOWN.. by THE UT... not that thing from Austin:D

Get on the Lane train!

Originally Posted by acl65pilot (Post 700212)

Problem is that discussing anything about the elections is prohibited. Em by-laws would need to change. :eek:

Originally Posted by RockyMtMadDog (Post 700172)

So since you did not have the authority to send it out, who did? That's all I am asking. Every candidate I have talked to so far denies that he did. I do not understand why it's such a secret. And I don't see the point of tradng one group that likes to keep secrets for another that also does (or simply can't tell the truth). Maybe I am an idealist.

Originally Posted by Check Essential (Post 700241)

How do you know it has to be a named candidate? There's a space on the BallotPoint website for "write-ins". Coulda been anyone.

I'm thinking of getting in the race. I got me a slogan:

"Vote for Check. All your wildest dreams will come true."