Quote:
Originally Posted by sailingfun
ATL put the same message out on effects some contract changes can have. There is still a vocal group who wants CDO's back.
The ATL reps had input into the survey construction just as the SLC reps did. Just because the ATL and SLC reps are crowing about how some of the things they think we "want" are concessionary is no reason to have hope in them. Weren't these bases in favor of CDOs before they were against them?
They "heard us loud and clear" and jettisoned the CDOs from being part of the 117 agreement, yet here they are again. And why is that?
No doubt there are some amongst are midst that "want CDOs back," but do you think there is any way in hell that that number is above 50%???? Do they really even need to ask?
It really doesn't matter a hill of beans what we put in the survey. Ultimately MD, the NC, and to a lesser degree, the MEC, will have the final (unaccountable) say. I filled mine out just for grins. But I have about as much expectation that the will of the group will be followed as I do in winning the next Powerball.
Perhaps they're just floating all of these concessionary ideas our way so if they "stand firm" against the majority of them, they can then declare "victory" for our "historic C2015" contract. Sign here boys, it could've been a lot worse...