![]() |
|
Originally Posted by formerdal
(Post 1745462)
You got that backwards...DPMP is the medical plan.
|
Originally Posted by C130
(Post 1745775)
Fair enough. I should not have called a bunch of people I don't know idiots. I guess I just get a tad frustrated at this message sometimes with all the off topic stuff. But I accept the public whippings about my original idiotic comments. Apologies.
|
Originally Posted by NuGuy
(Post 1745807)
Heyas Amish,
With one exception (a near disastrous experiment with a HMO plan back in the day), I've been on the DPMP, "Option N", and the NWA Contract Plan before that. I've always been very happy, with zero surprises, and minimal paperwork, number crunching or money juggling. It always seemed too important to jack around with. I make an appointment with the DR, I go, they pay. Same with the meds. I vastly preferred BCBS as the administrator, but I haven't run into too many problems with UHC, and, in fact, they approved some items pretty quickly when I had my doubts. I haven't had any in-network/out of network issues (with the one exception of Physical Therapy providers). I had one medium-ish surgery, one medium-ish out-patient procedure, and a pooper-snoop, and everything was covered with no hassles, including multiple MRI's, CT's, X-rays, and all the happy fun time that goes with that. My experience echoes yours to a T. In all cases I picked the Doc, Surgeon or specialist directly with zero hassle. I see absolutely no reason to change. Disclaimer: Not married, no kids, no recurring medical issues or long-term prescription needs. Obviously not many fall into this category, so YMMV, DYODD. Nu If I see you in NRT, you're buyin. Carl |
Originally Posted by C130
(Post 1745775)
Fair enough. I should not have called a bunch of people I don't know idiots. I guess I just get a tad frustrated at this message sometimes with all the off topic stuff. But I accept the public whippings about my original idiotic comments. Apologies.
Your mistake was in thinking this thread had a topic. There is no topic. The thread is the topic. All your topics...are belong to us! Carl |
Originally Posted by 76drvr
(Post 1745605)
You've got your facts wrong. The 32.5% plus the work rules and efficiencies we're negotiate with loa 46.
|
Originally Posted by 76drvr
(Post 1745605)
You've got your facts wrong. The 32.5% plus the work rules and efficiencies we're negotiate with loa 46.
Originally Posted by sailingfun
(Post 1745830)
Which was pre Moak.
Carl |
Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
(Post 1745829)
Actually, you called us freaking idiots.
Carl C130, party foul. I will find you and relegate you to Airbus hell. :) Less insults, more underboob! |
Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
(Post 1745838)
And the concessions in 1113 was?
Carl Lots of suck to go around from many directions. |
Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
(Post 1745845)
They took concessions pre-chapter 11 (30+%), then took more coinciding with the 1113 proceedings when the judge refused to recognize concessions taken prior to bankruptcy declaration. Your boy Malone was a leader in that time period.
|
Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
(Post 1745838)
And the concessions in 1113 was?
76-seat RJs, provided no pilot on the list at that time is furloughed Another 14% of pay Reduction in vacation 75% sick pay after 240 hours of use in rolling 3-year period Hard freeze of the A plan Concessions to us: Subsequent pay increases based in part on profitability 15/20% profit sharing plan $2.1B stock grant upon exiting bankruptcy $650M cash payment upon exiting bankruptcy if A plan is terminated |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:28 AM. |
|
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands