Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?
11-06-2014 | 06:41 PM
veut gagner à la loterie
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 23,286
Likes: 0
From: Light Chop
Thanks for the mental image there Timbo.
11-06-2014 | 06:49 PM
Runs with scissors
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 7,847
Likes: 0
From: Going to hell in a bucket, but enjoying the ride .
11-06-2014 | 07:04 PM
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 6,070
Likes: 1
From: Urban chicken rancher.
11-06-2014 | 07:05 PM
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,004
Likes: 0
From: MD-88 F/O
Would anyone have a copy of our CFO giving a presentation to Deutche Bank earlier this year or maybe late last? Not the one with RA and such but a solo presentation....he made a few great remarks involving profit sharing and the way that the company was using it, basically, as a relief valve for employee compensation....good times equal good money, bad times reduces employee compensation to a baseline level... It could blood info to bolster the argument to keeping profit sharing right where it is...
11-06-2014 | 11:38 PM
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 2,642
Likes: 0
From: right for a long, long time
Would anyone have a copy of our CFO giving a presentation to Deutche Bank earlier this year or maybe late last? Not the one with RA and such but a solo presentation....he made a few great remarks involving profit sharing and the way that the company was using it, basically, as a relief valve for employee compensation....good times equal good money, bad times reduces employee compensation to a baseline level... It could blood info to bolster the argument to keeping profit sharing right where it is...
(It's the same guy that says we should get a 14% payraise because of AA pilot talks, but then laments the billions in concessions and says we need a "snap up" to 2004+inflation. Which is it?)
Contact any of your reps. It's not part of the discussion. Don't feed the troll.
11-07-2014 | 01:03 AM
Straight QOL, homie
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 4,202
Likes: 1
From: Record-Shattering Profit Facilitator
There's only one person talking about reducing profit sharing, and he's a troll.
(It's the same guy that says we should get a 14% payraise because of AA pilot talks, but then laments the billions in concessions and says we need a "snap up" to 2004+inflation. Which is it?)
Contact any of your reps. It's not part of the discussion. Don't feed the troll.
(It's the same guy that says we should get a 14% payraise because of AA pilot talks, but then laments the billions in concessions and says we need a "snap up" to 2004+inflation. Which is it?)
Contact any of your reps. It's not part of the discussion. Don't feed the troll.
11-07-2014 | 01:59 AM
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 3,108
Likes: 0
Give Mike Hanson a call and report back to us on whether or not you think we will reduce profit sharing. Or you can continue to live in dream world.
I suppose you were one of the many who said I was full of crap on C2012 when I said we were going to allow many more 76 seat RJs.
I hope more than anything to be wrong. Remember, the reps are flying the line. Just like last time, it is the admin insiders who make the concessions.
In C2012 the MEC never authorized or discussed reducing profit sharing. O'Malley agreed to it without MEC knowledge and it was jammed down their throats. Same plan this time.
I suppose you were one of the many who said I was full of crap on C2012 when I said we were going to allow many more 76 seat RJs.
I hope more than anything to be wrong. Remember, the reps are flying the line. Just like last time, it is the admin insiders who make the concessions.
In C2012 the MEC never authorized or discussed reducing profit sharing. O'Malley agreed to it without MEC knowledge and it was jammed down their throats. Same plan this time.
11-07-2014 | 03:03 AM
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 327
Likes: 2
22D2 staffing report
I am kind of confused by this. Is this minimum pilot count by category/seat that is required contractually? Is it safe to assume there will be slightly more in each category than the minimum required?
Thanks
Thanks
11-07-2014 | 05:10 AM
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 1,299
Likes: 0
As you were not on the MEC at the time, you have no way to know whether the first statement is true. And you have no way of knowing whether your last statement is true, either.
11-07-2014 | 05:27 AM
Sho me da money!
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 947
Likes: 0
From: B25, Left
Give Mike Hanson a call and report back to us on whether or not you think we will reduce profit sharing. Or you can continue to live in dream world.
I suppose you were one of the many who said I was full of crap on C2012 when I said we were going to allow many more 76 seat RJs.
I hope more than anything to be wrong. Remember, the reps are flying the line. Just like last time, it is the admin insiders who make the concessions.
In C2012 the MEC never authorized or discussed reducing profit sharing. O'Malley agreed to it without MEC knowledge and it was jammed down their throats. Same plan this time.
I suppose you were one of the many who said I was full of crap on C2012 when I said we were going to allow many more 76 seat RJs.
I hope more than anything to be wrong. Remember, the reps are flying the line. Just like last time, it is the admin insiders who make the concessions.
In C2012 the MEC never authorized or discussed reducing profit sharing. O'Malley agreed to it without MEC knowledge and it was jammed down their throats. Same plan this time.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
